Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2023-01-15 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 at 23:25, Morten Linderud wrote: > > devtools version 20230105-1 has been released into [core]! > > This enable the debug option for all our packages :) Much nice! Went ahead and purged the debug option from */trunk/PKGBUILD. (If someone thinks the option should stay for a bi

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2023-01-14 Thread Morten Linderud
devtools version 20230105-1 has been released into [core]! This enable the debug option for all our packages :) I have updated the Go package guidelines with some flags that needs to be present to create proper debug packages with the go compiler. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Go_package_gui

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-11-05 Thread Morten Linderud
Yo! pacman version 6.0.2-5 is now in [core] and should have all the patches I messed up the last round :) Thanks anthraxxx<3 I have currently pushed a testing debug package of `delve` to our repositories and everything seems to be working properly! It would be great if people checked that any i

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-13 Thread Morten Linderud
Just to followup on this abit. 6.0.2-1 was released, but we found a bug as the $pkgbase was not properly added to the /usr/src/debug/ portion of the string. We patched[1] this bug with 6.0.2-2 but it broke several debug packages, but it turns out this actually breaks packages built in sub-directo

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-12 Thread Levente Polyak
On 10/7/22 13:35, Jelle van der Waa wrote: ... This all needs some further debugging :) Thanks a lot for the detailed info. I've done additional rounds of testing using the latest pacman patches [0]: There are rumors that the pacman patch "strip: fix unique source paths" may have side-effect

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-07 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 07/10/2022 13:35, Jelle van der Waa wrote: Short update, Running makepkg, going into src/arch-rebuild-order [jelle@t14s][/tmp/arch-rebuild-order/trunk/src/arch-rebuild-order]%debugedit --list-file /dev/stdout target/debug/arch-rebuild-order | tr '\0' '\n' | less /rustc/1.64.0/library/all

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-07 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 07/10/2022 13:35, Jelle van der Waa wrote: Short update, So, the source code cannot be found while it is available: tar tvf arch-rebuild-order-debug-0.3.1-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2022-10-07 13:24 usr/src/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2022-10-07 13:24 usr/src/

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-07 Thread Jelle van der Waa
Short update, On 06/10/2022 13:42, Jelle van der Waa wrote: On 05/10/2022 16:28, Morten Linderud wrote: Yo! With the release of pacman 6.0.2 we have now support for debug packages through `debugedit` as opposed to the awk hack used previously. https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-06 Thread Morten Linderud
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 01:42:32PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > > On 05/10/2022 16:28, Morten Linderud wrote: > > Yo! > > > > With the release of pacman 6.0.2 we have now support for debug packages > > through > > `debugedit` as opposed to the awk hack used previously. > > > > https://g

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-06 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 05/10/2022 16:28, Morten Linderud wrote: Yo! With the release of pacman 6.0.2 we have now support for debug packages through `debugedit` as opposed to the awk hack used previously. https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/commit/ae2f506ddfd1 I removed my testing chroot in /var/lib/

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-06 Thread Morten Linderud
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 09:28:36AM +0200, Antonio Rojas wrote: > El jueves, 6 de octubre de 2022 1:58:46 (CEST) Allan McRae escribió: > > >> * The source files should be located in > > >> `/usr/src/debug/${pkgbase}-${pkgver}` > > > > > > That doesn't seem to be the case. The entire ${srcdir} is i

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-06 Thread Antonio Rojas
El jueves, 6 de octubre de 2022 1:58:46 (CEST) Allan McRae escribió: > >> * The source files should be located in > >> `/usr/src/debug/${pkgbase}-${pkgver}` > > > > That doesn't seem to be the case. The entire ${srcdir} is installed > > directly under /usr/src/debug. > > This can potentially cau

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-05 Thread Allan McRae
On 6/10/22 01:03, Antonio Rojas wrote: Thanks for your work on this! From a quick test it seems much faster than the previous implementation. * The source files should be located in `/usr/src/debug/${pkgbase}-${pkgver}` That doesn't seem to be the case. The entire ${srcdir} is installed dire

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-05 Thread Antonio Rojas
Thanks for your work on this! From a quick test it seems much faster than the previous implementation. > * The source files should be located in `/usr/src/debug/${pkgbase}-${pkgver}` That doesn't seem to be the case. The entire ${srcdir} is installed directly under /usr/src/debug. This can pote

Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-05 Thread Morten Linderud
Yo! With the release of pacman 6.0.2 we have now support for debug packages through `debugedit` as opposed to the awk hack used previously. https://gitlab.archlinux.org/pacman/pacman/-/commit/ae2f506ddfd1 This should resolve several issues we have had with the existing debug packages and I want