El jueves, 17 de noviembre de 2022 20:07:01 (CET) Antonio Rojas escribió:
> Any objections to dropping all of them?
All gone.
Le jeudi 17 novembre 2022, 20:07:01 CET Antonio Rojas a écrit :
> El miércoles, 9 de noviembre de 2022 17:34:44 (CET) Antonio Rojas escribió:
> > If there are no objections, I will open a todo list to disable the
> > dependency in all packages where it's possible, and otherwise drop them.
> This
El miércoles, 9 de noviembre de 2022 17:34:44 (CET) Antonio Rojas escribió:
> If there are no objections, I will open a todo list to disable the
> dependency in all packages where it's possible, and otherwise drop them.
This turned out to be less problematic than expected. Many of the dependant
On 11/9/22 17:34, Antonio Rojas wrote:
Hi,
Qtwebkit has been unmaintained for a long time (last release from annulen's
fork was almost 3 years ago) and is plagued with security issues by now. Most
consumers are either dead upstream, of they use it to provide optional
functionality that can b
El miércoles, 9 de noviembre de 2022 21:52:48 (CET) Christian Hesse escribió:
> Just to be sure... We speak about package 'qt5-webkit' here?
Correct
Antonio Rojas on Wed, 2022/11/09 17:34:
> Hi,
> Qtwebkit has been unmaintained for a long time (last release from
> annulen's fork was almost 3 years ago) and is plagued with security issues
> by now. Most consumers are either dead upstream, of they use it to provide
> optional functionality that
Hi,
Qtwebkit has been unmaintained for a long time (last release from annulen's
fork was almost 3 years ago) and is plagued with security issues by now. Most
consumers are either dead upstream, of they use it to provide optional
functionality that can be disabled at build time. I propose to dro
