On 2022-11-13 21:17:29 (+0100), Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> https://sources.archlinux.org/sources/$pkgbase/whatever.tar.gz
>
> They are versioned, example:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 sourceballs sourceballs 49M May 22 13:42
> zynaddsubfx-3.0.6-3.src.tar.gz
> So I never said I wanted the archive in a Git
On 13/11/2022 19:37, David Runge wrote:
On 2022-11-13 17:42:27 (+0100), Jelle van der Waa wrote:
For packaging we now rely on external parties to keep the source code
hosted which can be a problem and some packagers want to search
through all our packages code. [1]
Currently we already archive
On 11/13/22 19:37, David Runge wrote:
On 2022-11-13 17:42:27 (+0100), Jelle van der Waa wrote:
For packaging we now rely on external parties to keep the source code
hosted which can be a problem and some packagers want to search
through all our packages code. [1]
Currently we already archive so
On 2022-11-13 17:42:27 (+0100), Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> For packaging we now rely on external parties to keep the source code
> hosted which can be a problem and some packagers want to search
> through all our packages code. [1]
>
> Currently we already archive sources using `sourceballs` on
>
On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 at 18:43, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> * Do we have enough disk space for archiving?
You have to take gemini's daily backups into consideration as well.
They already take up a lot of backup space [1] and several hours to
finish every day. I can see gemini falling over if we st
Hey all,
For packaging we now rely on external parties to keep the source code
hosted which can be a problem and some packagers want to search through
all our packages code. [1]
Currently we already archive sources using `sourceballs` on
repos.archlinux.org for GPL licensed packages, this is
