On 3/2/21 2:37 AM, Sébastien Luttringer via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 00:19 +0100, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public wrote:
>> I think this is a great step for our distro to get a nicely pre shaped
>> proposals before hitting the final review and presentation phase as well
>>
On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 00:19 +0100, Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public wrote:
> I think this is a great step for our distro to get a nicely pre shaped
> proposals before hitting the final review and presentation phase as well
> as a central point for storing those. I think its pretty tough for fresh
Thank you all for the RFC idea, healthy discussion around it and the
first RFC about having and RFC :)
I think this is a great step for our distro to get a nicely pre shaped
proposals before hitting the final review and presentation phase as well
as a central point for storing those. I think its p
On 2021-02-16 13:38:06 (-0300), Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > Gitlab is going to be opened within the next months and we have
> > users on Gitlab today. It's not limited to staff.
True, but as we enforce the access rights to all of our repositories,
we can change that if the n
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:38:06PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em fevereiro 15, 2021 18:54 Morten Linderud escreveu:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:45:02PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> > > Em fevereiro 15, 2021 15:27 Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public escreveu:
> > > > > A general c
Em fevereiro 15, 2021 18:54 Morten Linderud escreveu:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:45:02PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em fevereiro 15, 2021 15:27 Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public escreveu:
>
> A general concern is "who has access to the repository"? Can anyone take the
> template and s
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:45:02PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em fevereiro 15, 2021 15:27 Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public escreveu:
> >
> > A general concern is "who has access to the repository"? Can anyone take the
> > template and submit an RFC that we'd need to consider on the mai
Em fevereiro 15, 2021 15:27 Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public escreveu:
A general concern is "who has access to the repository"? Can anyone take the
template and submit an RFC that we'd need to consider on the mailing list after
a subsequent discussion? I can see it clear as sky the day Gitlab
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:19:10PM +0100, David Runge via arch-dev-public wrote:
> This first RFC is rather special, as it is meant to bootstrap the
> process and introduce it for adoption (while the process is actually not
> yet in place). Therefore I am skipping the "Final Comment Period" on the
Hey all,
it has been roughly two weeks since my first mail and the discussions we
have had via comments on the RFC merge request have concluded. Thank you
all for your improvement suggestions and feedback!
This first RFC is rather special, as it is meant to bootstrap the
process and introduce it
Dear staff,
I have begun work on a Request for Comment (RFC) process for Arch Linux
and I am excited to now be able to open the first RFC... to introduce
"Using RFCs" :)
A new RFC (request for comment) has been opened here:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/1
Please v
11 matches
Mail list logo
