Hi,
In the recent discussions about possibly adding support for x86_64-v3 the
general consensus seemed to be that we need to first work on our packaging
infrastructure (build pipelines, reproducible builds, etc.).
Who's currently working on that and where I can get involved? Are there already
any
On 2021-12-16 19:53 +1000
Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>Assuming that dependent library is not used elsewhere in the package,
>and the extra library had a provide of its library version, then this
>would add an extra dependency.
>
>There are several options:
>1) disable autodeps - thes
On 2021-12-15 16:40 +1000
Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>LIB_DIRS is specified in makepkg.conf, not in PKGBUILDs. Given
>usr/lib/ is not even standard for 64bit libraries, I do not want to hard
>code anything.
I somehow completely missed the part where you explicitly said it would be
On 2021-12-13 18:35 +1000
Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I submitted a patchset to pacman that I would like some packager
>feed-back on. [1]
>
>Essentially this replaces the old libdepends/libprovides system into
>something akin to that used by APK. In short, makepkg.conf wil
Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public wrote:
People are urged to choose between the following
>four options:
>
>- Option 1: Maintainer
>- Option 2: Packager
>- Option 3: Package Maintainer
>- Option 4: Package & Aur Maintainer
>
>I realize this is a little late but I want to suggest "Repo Mainta
