Re: Adopting similar packages in extra

2025-06-09 Thread Massimiliano Torromeo
ct description is accurate. I am not aware if there are more substantial code changes between the 2 repos. That being said I really don't like to maintain code, so if you want to adopt it and rename it you have my blessing and I would very much like to abandon it. -- Massimiliano Torromeo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Virtual package naming

2022-11-29 Thread Massimiliano Torromeo
mal ones (e.g. java-runtime, d-compiler). Maybe an "-alternatives" suffix? I.e: java-runtime-alternatives d-compiler-alternatives pulseaudio-alternatives -- Massimiliano Torromeo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Chromium losing Sync support on March 15

2021-01-26 Thread Massimiliano Torromeo via arch-dev-public
t would still keep some users away from Chrome since I suspect most users would resort to installing something like "chrome- bin". Also, who knows, maybe this will make someone start working on a free alternative to google sync... -- Massimiliano Torromeo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [arch-dev-public] Chromium losing Sync support on March 15

2021-01-26 Thread Massimiliano Torromeo via arch-dev-public
stro on my work laptop, but banning it from the AUR!? Do you even care about our users? I personally think that as long as there is a willing maintainer we should just package chromium without the google api keys just like fedora is doing? Or are we also dropping the multitude of other browsers w