Hi all,
The DevOps team is working on splitting[0] the repo server and the
archive server, which are currently still located on the same box
(gemini.archlinux.org). This reason for splitting it is mainly due to
I/O issues and to ensure separation of concerns. Please see [1] and [2]
for a bit
An RFC has now entered Final Comment Period. In 14 days, discussion will end
and the proposal will either be accepted, rejected or withdrawn:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/31
Please visit the above link for discussion.
Summary:
Grant all Arch Linux staff members,
On 20.03.2024 13.42, kpcyrd wrote:
Where do we go from here? It would be cool if the OCI container image
itself could also be reproduced (bit-for-bit), but I'm not sure if
there's any prior work (specifically for images listed as 'official'
on Docker Hub)?
Specifically what I mean - given a l
A new RFC (request for comment) has been opened here:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/31
Please visit the above link for discussion.
Summary:
Grant all Arch Linux staff members, not limited to those in packaging
roles, the privilege to initiate RFCs directly, alig
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/infrastructure/-/issues/548
[2] Server for running pipelines for trusted Arch Linux projects
[3] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/releng/
Cheers,
Kristian Klausen
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
. GitLab will
fix it eventually.
[1] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409953
Cheers,
Kristian Klausen
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 17.05.2022 19.27, Kristian Klausen wrote:
On 15.05.2022 23.53, Kristian Klausen wrote:
So, is there any reasons for not deprecating it? How are you using it
and could that need be met in some other (and perhaps better) way?
So from the response I got so far, it sounds like the archive
On 23.07.2022 18.38, David Runge wrote:
Hi all,
I currently have a MR open against archlinux-keyring [1], that adds a
systemd service and timer, which would automatically refresh valid and
existing keys on user systems. For people without access to the
repository's ticket and merge request fea
[2] https://md.archlinux.org/mDhhaF0WRaOPMmyYqifn2Q
Cheers,
Kristian Klausen
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 15.05.2022 23.53, Kristian Klausen wrote:
So, is there any reasons for not deprecating it? How are you using it
and could that need be met in some other (and perhaps better) way?
So from the response I got so far, it sounds like the archive isn't used.
If I don't get any new re
need be met in some other (and perhaps better) way?
[1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/infrastructure/-/issues/59
Cheers,
Kristian Klausen
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
].
[1] https://github.com/archlinux/mkinitcpio
Cheers,
Kristian Klausen
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 30.01.2022 12.08, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
I'm very happy to announce that debug packages in Arch Linux has been deployed
:)
This work began after FOSDEM 2020 and was announced in November 2020. However
because of time constraints it took quite a while before we managed to
UNIX user with ForceCommand=signing-script
- All signing operations are logged
- Only signing requests from gemini's WireGuard IP address is allowed
[1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/signstar
[2] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/infrastructure
Best regards
Kristian Klausen
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 20:45:45 +0100, Pierre Schmitz via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> sorry about the hassle. I did not expect much issues here. I would
> consider this one of the smoother PHP updates. Unless people ignored
> warnings by previous PHP versions. I guess that is what mos
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 22:03:55 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> There is potential you already discussed this on the private mailing
> list but I do not have access to the email archives that are linked in
> the RFC. Nor do community members who are encouraged to comment on
> RFCs
On 28.08.2021 17.37, Caleb Maclennan via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 2021-08-21 22:24, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public wrote:
I would love to see someone from our team pick up namcap
maintainership, [...]
Is there any progress on this decision? So far we have 4 of us that
are interested i
credentials. On Android the
following apps support backup:
* https://github.com/andOTP/andOTP
* https://getaegis.app/
Authy is also worth mentioning although it is proprietary:
* https://authy.com/
Best regards
Kristian Klausen - DevOps
On 23.06.2021 22.01, Jelle van der Waa via arch-devops wrote:
Hi All,
Today mailman was moved to a dedicated vps, making git.archlinux.org
the last service to run on luna which we intend to retire as it's an
old expensive box and GitLab is our replacement for Git hosting.
Luna is now wiped
On 23.06.2021 22.01, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public wrote:
If your project has not been migrated to Gitlab yet please contact
devops for help migrating it. A list of known to require migration is
listed in this ticket. [1]
As the invoice date comes up the 8th, it would be awesome if we
On 23.06.2021 18.49, Kristian Klausen via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 22.06.2021 19.05, Kristian Klausen via arch-dev-public wrote:
Hi all
The time has finally come to migrate lists.al.org away from Luna and
to a Hetzner Cloud VPS.
I will do the final testing today and if all goes well the
On 22.06.2021 19.05, Kristian Klausen via arch-dev-public wrote:
Hi all
The time has finally come to migrate lists.al.org away from Luna and
to a Hetzner Cloud VPS.
I will do the final testing today and if all goes well the migration
will be handled tomorrow (23th of June) between 16-24UTC
e/-/blob/a2b8682316e32ea956f6b6efedf4d7cff4f333b6/roles/postfix/files/mailman_compat
[3]
https://wiki.list.org/DOC/How%20do%20I%20configure%20postfix_to_mailman.py%3F
Best regards
Kristian Klausen - DevOps
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
23 matches
Mail list logo
