[arch-dev-public] Python packaging future (PEP 517 & removal of setup.py calls)

2022-02-19 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
Hi all, As some of you might know, the Python packaging ecosystem is changing. If you have noticed a lack of setup.py or its replacement with pyproject.toml then you already ran into issues I want to discuss today. I will a bit in-depth when explaining the motivation and current state of affairs,

Re: [arch-dev-public] Starting x86_64_v3 port

2022-01-28 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 11:45 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 29/1/22 11:28, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:22:32AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public > > wrote: > > > On 29/1/22 11:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote: > > >

Re: [arch-dev-public] namcap maintainership

2021-08-21 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
On Sat, 2021-08-21 at 22:41 +0300, Caleb Maclennan via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 2021-08-21 22:24, Jelle van der Waa via arch-dev-public wrote: > > I would love to see someone from our team pick up namcap > > maintainership, take a look at all the pending patches, bugs on the > > tracker and keep

[arch-dev-public] RFC: Move distribution guidelines to a Git repo

2021-08-13 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
A new RFC (request for comment) has been opened here: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/5 Please visit the above link for discussion. Summary: Put distribution guidlelines in a Git repository and enforce a review process. signature.asc Description: This is a digital

[arch-dev-public] Looking for co-maintainers (and proposal to join cross toolchain packages)

2021-06-16 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
Hi all, Over the past few weeks, perhaps months(?), I have been struggling a little bit with mental health and that has made it a bit harder to keep up-to-date with packaging. For this reason, I would like find co-maintainers for my packages, so that it eases things in times like this. Feel free t

Re: [arch-dev-public] ON HOLD - RFC: Use x86_64-v2 architecture

2021-03-04 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 21:33 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 3/3/21 10:54 am, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > > On 2/3/21 9:51 pm, Allan McRae wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > A new RFC has been opened here: > > > https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_reque

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC: Use x86_64-v2 architecture

2021-03-03 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 21:11 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 3/3/21 9:00 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 20:52 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > > > I'd hate to be the dbscripts maintainer who implements that!  Also, > > > $arch in mirror URLs would

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC: Use x86_64-v2 architecture

2021-03-03 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 20:52 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 3/3/21 8:32 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 19:44 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > > > On 3/3/21 7:31 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 12:12 +1000, Allan McRae via ar

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC: Use x86_64-v2 architecture

2021-03-03 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 19:44 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 3/3/21 7:31 pm, Filipe Laíns wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 12:12 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > > > On 3/3/21 11:56 am, Filipe Laíns wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 11:10 +1000, Allan McRae via a

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC: Use x86_64-v2 architecture

2021-03-03 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 12:12 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 3/3/21 11:56 am, Filipe Laíns wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 11:10 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > > > On 3/3/21 11:03 am, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: > > > > I wonder, might this be an inte

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC: Use x86_64-v2 architecture

2021-03-02 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 11:10 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 3/3/21 11:03 am, Eli Schwartz via arch-dev-public wrote: > > I wonder, might this be an interesting time to reintroduce multiple > > architectures? > > > > We used to offer i686 and x86_64. > > > > Maybe now we could o

Re: [arch-dev-public] Arch Linux in GSOC 2021

2021-02-01 Thread Filipe Laíns via arch-dev-public
On Fri, 2020-10-30 at 21:18 +0200, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > Hi all! > > Last year Arch Linux applied to be a mentoring organisation in the > Google Summer of Code program. There were quite a few cool projects and > lots of keen people. Unfortunately, we were not selected. > > However, I was hop