Heads up: cmake 4 may cause build failures

2025-03-27 Thread Antonio Rojas
cmake 4 (currently in testing) removes support for cmake_minimum_required values below 3.5. This may cause build failures especially for unmaintained or poorly maintained upstream projects. Those can be fixed by increasing the cmake_minimum_required value in CMakeLists.txt. Note that this will c

Spring cleanup '25

2025-03-22 Thread Antonio Rojas
Time to clean up old cruft again. Please head to https://archlinux.org/devel/reports/unneeded-orphans/ and adopt packages you want to keep in the repos. For reference, a current list of packages is attached (but this may vary if packages are adopted/disowned). If you adopt a package from the li

Re: Spring cleanup '24

2024-03-11 Thread Antonio Rojas
El lunes, 11 de marzo de 2024 a las 21:23 Morten Linderud escribió: > Some quick observations is that there are several packages on the list we > should probably not be dropping. The ones that come to mind is refind at > the very least. > Please keep dictionaries too (aspell-*/hunspell-*/hyphen-

Re: Python 3.12

2024-02-25 Thread Antonio Rojas
El domingo, 25 de febrero de 2024 a las 14:23 Jelle van der Waa escribió: > So soon we can start the rebuild which will probably take a while to > complete as we have no good automated tooling yet for mass rebuilds. > This rebuild will likely block [staging] for a good 2 or more weeks, so > when w

NEWS DRAFT: TeX Live package reorganization

2023-06-17 Thread Antonio Rojas
Starting from version 2023.66594-9, TeX Live packages have been reorganized to mirror upstream collections. Even though the new texlive-basic replaces the old texlive-core, many of the texlive-core contents (including language specific files) are now split between different packages. To find out

Re: Flyspray migration plan

2023-06-02 Thread Antonio Rojas
Hi, El jueves, 1 de junio de 2023 22:48:21 (CEST) Jelle van der Waa escribió: > On Gitlab, packagers will get auto-assigned on issues for packages they > are the maintainer of in Archweb (https://archlinux.org/devel). A bot > will periodically scan issues and automatically assign them. We are al

Spring cleanup '23

2023-03-22 Thread Antonio Rojas
Hello, It is that time of the year again: time for our yearly orphans cleanup. Please head to https://archlinux.org/devel/reports/unneeded-orphans/ and adopt packages that you'd like to keep in the repos. This is also a good opportunity to disown any packages you no longer want to maintain, s

Re: Dropping qtwebkit

2022-11-20 Thread Antonio Rojas
El jueves, 17 de noviembre de 2022 20:07:01 (CET) Antonio Rojas escribió: > Any objections to dropping all of them? All gone.

Re: Dropping qtwebkit

2022-11-17 Thread Antonio Rojas
El miércoles, 9 de noviembre de 2022 17:34:44 (CET) Antonio Rojas escribió: > If there are no objections, I will open a todo list to disable the > dependency in all packages where it's possible, and otherwise drop them. This turned out to be less problematic than expected.

Re: Dropping qtwebkit

2022-11-09 Thread Antonio Rojas
El miércoles, 9 de noviembre de 2022 21:52:48 (CET) Christian Hesse escribió: > Just to be sure... We speak about package 'qt5-webkit' here? Correct

Dropping qtwebkit

2022-11-09 Thread Antonio Rojas
Hi, Qtwebkit has been unmaintained for a long time (last release from annulen's fork was almost 3 years ago) and is plagued with security issues by now. Most consumers are either dead upstream, of they use it to provide optional functionality that can be disabled at build time. I propose to dro

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-06 Thread Antonio Rojas
El jueves, 6 de octubre de 2022 1:58:46 (CEST) Allan McRae escribió: > >> * The source files should be located in > >> `/usr/src/debug/${pkgbase}-${pkgver}` > > > > That doesn't seem to be the case. The entire ${srcdir} is installed > > directly under /usr/src/debug. > > This can potentially cau

Re: Need help testing pacman 6.0.2 debug packages

2022-10-05 Thread Antonio Rojas
Thanks for your work on this! From a quick test it seems much faster than the previous implementation. > * The source files should be located in `/usr/src/debug/${pkgbase}-${pkgver}` That doesn't seem to be the case. The entire ${srcdir} is installed directly under /usr/src/debug. This can pote

NEWS DRAFT: wxWidgets 3.2 update may need manual intervention

2022-07-11 Thread Antonio Rojas
wxWidgets 3.2 provides a Qt frontend in addition to the GTK3 one, so packages have been renamed from wxgtk-* to wxwidgets-*. The GTK2 frontend is no longer provided. If you have wxgtk2 installed, the upgrade will fail with error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) ::

Re: News draft: qmk>=1.1.0-1 update may require manual intervention

2022-05-28 Thread Antonio Rojas
El sábado, 28 de mayo de 2022 17:58:53 (CEST), Morten Linderud escribió: The qmk package prior to version 1.1.0-1 was missing the compiled python modules. This has been fixed so the upgrade may need to overwrite any untracked pyc files created. If you get errors like these This will affect ev

Re: The future of arch-commits

2022-05-15 Thread Antonio Rojas
El domingo, 15 de mayo de 2022 23:53:31 (CEST), Kristian Klausen escribió: So, is there any reasons for not deprecating it? How are you using it and could that need be met in some other (and perhaps better) way? I do use it to monitor commits, so I'd appreciate if the list was kept. I do not

Re: [arch-dev-public] Spring cleanup '22

2022-04-08 Thread Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public
El martes, 5 de abril de 2022 1:49:27 (CEST), George Rawlinson via arch-dev-public escribió: Bit late getting around to this (whoops!), I require some of these packages. Any chance of moving the following to community: * libmms * ttf-dejavu Moved * libnet This is needed by the openjdk's. F

Re: [arch-dev-public] Spring cleanup '22

2022-03-30 Thread Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public
. On 2022-03-21 11:36, Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public wrote: I will start dropping the leftovers to AUR in about 10 days. Last chance to adopt stuff, I will start dropping them in two days.

[arch-dev-public] Spring cleanup '22

2022-03-21 Thread Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public
Hello, Spring (in the northern hemisphere) is here and with it our yearly orphans cleanup. Please head to https://archlinux.org/devel/reports/unneeded-orphans/ and adopt packages that you'd like to keep in the repos. This is also a good oportunity to disown any packages you no longer want to

Re: [arch-dev-public] Accidental todo for fluidsynth

2021-07-23 Thread Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public
El viernes, 23 de julio de 2021 10:28:42 (CEST), Archange via arch-dev-public escribió: Please mind that here is already an (intel-)tbb rebuild waiting for the hdf5 one to finish. As well as a VTK one, but since I did not yet finish upgrading the PKGBUILD, I’m willing to let you the second spot

Re: [arch-dev-public] Spring cleanup '21

2021-05-08 Thread Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public
El miércoles, 28 de abril de 2021 22:26:13 (CEST), Santiago Torres-Arias via arch-dev-public escribió: > Unless there be dragons, I could happily pick up munin and > procinfo-ng... Since nobody objected, I moved procinfo-ng to [community], please adopt (and munin too) I dropped all remaining on

Re: [arch-dev-public] Spring cleanup '21

2021-04-28 Thread Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public
> Unless there be dragons, I could happily pick up munin and > procinfo-ng... Moved munin. procinfo-ng is in [core], I'll give people a few days to raise objections against moving it out (hopefully joined by an offer to maintain it).

[arch-dev-public] Spring cleanup '21

2021-04-28 Thread Antonio Rojas via arch-dev-public
It's been over a year since our last package cleanup and orphans keep piling up. Please head to https://archlinux.org/devel/reports/unneeded-orphans/ and adopt packages you'd like to keep in the repos. If you are not a dev and would like to adopt some orphan in [extra], reply here or ping me o