Re: First step for non-x86_64 contributions

2025-07-03 Thread Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 19:01, kpcyrd wrote: > On 7/3/25 12:09 PM, Campbell Jones wrote: > > That may be something worth considering in the future. As much as I > > dislike Fedora's package format, their decision to make architectures > > opt-*out* instead of opt-in has apparently reduced the frict

Re: First step for non-x86_64 contributions

2025-07-03 Thread kpcyrd
On 7/3/25 12:09 PM, Campbell Jones wrote: That may be something worth considering in the future. As much as I dislike Fedora's package format, their decision to make architectures opt-*out* instead of opt-in has apparently reduced the friction of adding new architectures quite a bit. We should

Re: First step for non-x86_64 contributions

2025-07-03 Thread Carsten Haitzler
On Thu, 03 Jul 2025 06:09:16 -0400 Campbell Jones said: > On July 2, 2025 3:25:22 PM EDT, Levente Polyak wrote: > >On 7/2/25 6:29 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 12:20:49 +0200 Christian Hesse said: > >> > >>> Carsten Haitzler on Wed, 2025/07/02 11:00: > Next releases

Re: First step for non-x86_64 contributions

2025-07-03 Thread Campbell Jones
On July 2, 2025 3:25:22 PM EDT, Levente Polyak wrote: >On 7/2/25 6:29 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 12:20:49 +0200 Christian Hesse said: >> >>> Carsten Haitzler on Wed, 2025/07/02 11:00: Next releases of anything I maintain shall be going arch=(any) as everything I