Re: News Draft: ppp >= 2.5.0-1 update may require manual intervention

2023-09-13 Thread Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig)
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:27 PM Felix Yan wrote: > As you may or may not have noticed, both `ppp` and `rp-pppoe` package > used to ship a `rp-pppoe.so` and they are not 100% compatible. Back in > 2021, ppp 2.4.9 starts to rename its own copy of `rp-pppoe.so` to > `pppoe.so`. As of `ppp 2.5.0`, up

Re: News Draft: ppp >= 2.5.0-1 update may require manual intervention

2023-09-13 Thread Justin Kromlinger
I had no idea what this even was, and the description isn't making it any better - 'A daemon which implements the Point-to-Point Protocol for dial-up networking'. How many users are gonna be affected by this? Maybe it makes sense to list (transitive) deps that are affected by this change. On We

News Draft: ppp >= 2.5.0-1 update may require manual intervention

2023-09-13 Thread Felix Yan
As you may or may not have noticed, both `ppp` and `rp-pppoe` package used to ship a `rp-pppoe.so` and they are not 100% compatible. Back in 2021, ppp 2.4.9 starts to rename its own copy of `rp-pppoe.so` to `pppoe.so`. As of `ppp 2.5.0`, upstream decided to remove the `rp-pppoe.so` symlink and