On 11/10/22 21:00, Levente Polyak wrote:
On 10/11/22 12:05, David Runge wrote:
- preserve base-devel as a group there
I'm actually currently working on moving it to a meta-package as well.
We didn't do it when introducing `base` as we never really changed it.
Now we did with debugedit and face
> > In the past there was a rule to get a basic but usable system up with
> > base group and core repo (=cd iso image).
>
> On the installation medium we are able to define an arbitrary list of
> packages. For a long time the editor of choice seems to have been vim.
>
> Do you have a link to anythi
On 2022-10-11 16:30:42 (+0200), Andreas Radke wrote:
> How comes? Nano is actually pretty well maintained and has seen lots
> of updates over the past years. See
Yep, that's why I wrote, that it is at least still somewhat maintained
(vi does not seem like it). :)
My rationale would be, that text e
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2022 12:05:44 +0200
schrieb David Runge :
> Hi all,
>
> we need to do a bit of [core] repository cleanup.
>
Why do you think so?
I can only imagine a cleanup where we need to drop a fully unmaintained
and unneeded package to avoid security risks.
And we may need to constantly
Am Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:14:12 +0200
schrieb David Runge :
> I'd argue neither needs to be in core. However, nano at least is still
> somewhat maintained.
How comes? Nano is actually pretty well maintained and has seen lots of
updates over the past years. See
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/nano
I'm of the opinion that at least one well-maintained text editor should remain
in core - my vote would be for nano, as vi has been outclassed by its clones
and ed doesn't see much use nowadays. I have no personal issues with the other
suggested cleanup items.
Best,
Campbell
--- Original M
Hey Tobias,
On 2022-10-11 12:53:25 (+0200), Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> here my short additions:
> - syslinux:
> is dead and not used in our projects anymore
I added it to the list. Syslinux itself is still somewhat useful if one
doesn't want to deal with grub on legacy boot systems.
> - nano vs.
On 2022-10-11 13:00:57 (+0200), Levente Polyak wrote:
> I'm actually currently working on moving it to a meta-package as well.
> We didn't do it when introducing `base` as we never really changed it.
> Now we did with debugedit and face small inconveniences and we are
> better of to have it as meta
On 10/11/22 12:05, David Runge wrote:
- preserve base-devel as a group there
I'm actually currently working on moving it to a meta-package as well.
We didn't do it when introducing `base` as we never really changed it.
Now we did with debugedit and face small inconveniences and we are
better of
> If you have more packages, that should not be in [core] anymore or
> should be moved to it, please add them to the list(s).
Thanks David,
here my short additions:
- syslinux:
is dead and not used in our projects anymore
- nano vs. vi
one editor could be enough, I can live with both.
- reiserfspr
Hi all,
we need to do a bit of [core] repository cleanup.
In this MD [1] (publicly visible readonly link [2]) we have a list of
packages that should leave [core], some maybes that need discussion
before moving them and some that should be moved to [core] from the
other repositories.
If you have
11 matches
Mail list logo
