Re: [arch-dev-public] [RFC] archweb nvchecker integration

On 22-02-01 08:21, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote: > These require running arbitrary scripts on archweb so they should probably > remain > unsupported. Is there no better options? At this stage, the following [community] packages that I maintain require massaging of HTML sources: * ht

Re: [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio some improvements and question on how kernel modules should be treated

Hi On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 6:54 AM Tobias Powalowski via arch-dev-public < arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.org> wrote: > Hi guys, > did some initcpio optimizing lately and implemented correct symlink > handling. This saves already some space. > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/73439 > > Now one maj

Re: [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio some improvements and question on how kernel modules should be treated

I have built a patched mkinitcpio to test: https://pkgbuild.com/~tpowa/mkinitcpio-beta/ Am Di., 1. Feb. 2022 um 15:54 Uhr schrieb Tobias Powalowski < tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com>: > Hi guys, > did some initcpio optimizing lately and implemented correct symlink > handling. This saves already

Re: [arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio some improvements and question on how kernel modules should be treated

On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 03:54:03PM +0100, Tobias Powalowski via arch-dev-public wrote: > Hi guys, > did some initcpio optimizing lately and implemented correct symlink > handling. This saves already some space. > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/73439 > > Now one major problem left in recent initc

[arch-dev-public] mkinitcpio some improvements and question on how kernel modules should be treated

Hi guys, did some initcpio optimizing lately and implemented correct symlink handling. This saves already some space. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/73439 Now one major problem left in recent initcpio, uncompressed modules: https://github.com/archlinux/mkinitcpio/pull/25 https://bugs.archlinux.or