Excerpts from Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public's message of January 29, 2022
2:28:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:22:32AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 29/1/22 11:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 10:12:30AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-de
On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 11:45 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 29/1/22 11:28, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:22:32AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> > wrote:
> > > On 29/1/22 11:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > >
On 29/1/22 13:12, Felix Yan via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 1/29/22 02:12, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
The decision to be made is who will package for this repo? I think
these are the options:
A) packagers upload both x86_64 and x86_64_v3 to the repos. Our build
server will help tho
On 1/29/22 02:12, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
The decision to be made is who will package for this repo? I think
these are the options:
A) packagers upload both x86_64 and x86_64_v3 to the repos. Our build
server will help those without x86_64_v3 machines.
B) we recruit some pack
On 29/1/22 11:28, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:22:32AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
On 29/1/22 11:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 10:12:30AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
Is there a
On 29/1/22 10:12, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
Apart from tooling (devtools/dbscripts), we need to make some decisions.
FYI - I just submitted merge requests for both devtools and dbscripts.
These should be committed in tandem with work at devops end preparing
the initial state of t
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:22:32AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> On 29/1/22 11:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 10:12:30AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
> > wrote:
> > > Is there any particular objection to requiring packagers up
On 29/1/22 11:13, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 10:12:30AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
Is there any particular objection to requiring packagers upload both
architectures?
I'm personally not really motivated doing the required builds. We ha
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 10:12:30AM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote:
> Is there any particular objection to requiring packagers upload both
> architectures?
I'm personally not really motivated doing the required builds. We have an
underdeveloped infrastructure which hasn't changed sinc
Hi all,
You may remember long in the past we discussed adding an x86_64_v3 port.
From memory, pkgstats shows this will benefit ~2/3 (or 3/4?) of our
users! So lets get this underway!
Apart from tooling (devtools/dbscripts), we need to make some decisions.
My plan is to seed the x86_64_v3 r
On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 16:47 +0100, Christian Hesse via arch-dev-public
wrote:
> Pierre Schmitz via arch-dev-public
> on
> Sun, 2022/01/23 12:50:
> > Next steps:
> > 1) Let's agree on a time window where no other rebuild can take
> > place
> > within our staging repos. How about at least the first
11 matches
Mail list logo