Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-09 Thread Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
On 9/10/21 10:07 pm, Alexander Epaneshnikov wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 09:17:05PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public > wrote: >> I am objecting to this RFC being accepted, as that would mean adopting a >> CoC I consider substandard to the point of being unacceptable. The >> ability to u

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC: Rename the Trusted User role

2021-10-09 Thread Kristian Klausen via arch-dev-public
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 22:03:55 +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > There is potential you already discussed this on the private mailing > list but I do not have access to the email archives that are linked in > the RFC. Nor do community members who are encouraged to comment on > RFCs

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-09 Thread Alexander Epaneshnikov via arch-dev-public
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 09:17:05PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > I am objecting to this RFC being accepted, as that would mean adopting a > CoC I consider substandard to the point of being unacceptable. The > ability to update it after does not change this situation. as far as I

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC: Rename the Trusted User role

2021-10-09 Thread Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
On 8/10/21 10:20 pm, Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public wrote: > A new RFC (request for comment) has been opened here: > > https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/7 > > Please visit the above link for discussion. > > Summary: > It is shown in some cases that the Trusted U

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-09 Thread Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
On 8/10/21 10:44 pm, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 09:40:24PM +1000, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public > wrote: >> On 8/10/21 9:31 pm, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote: >>> Which should satisfy your current problem with the document as-is. We can >>>

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-09 Thread Allan McRae via arch-dev-public
On 9/10/21 7:17 pm, Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public wrote: > Would it suffice if the RFC was changed to point at a specific branch, > let's say "current" > and then whatever CoC is later located at the top of that branch would > be the one the RFC is pointing to, hence enforced? No. That

Re: [arch-dev-public] RFC Final Comment Period: Adoption of a distribution-wide Code of Conduct

2021-10-09 Thread Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public
On 08/10/2021 15:33, Allan McRae via arch-dev-public wrote: > On 8/10/21 9:39 pm, Konstantin Gizdov via arch-dev-public wrote: >> Firstly, you are correct that the current GitLab login requires you to >> accept the CoC. In an attempt to remedy this situation, given the >> current software constrain