On January 14, 2025 03:39:45 Marek Olšák wrote:
I would keep the existing modifier interfaces, API extensions, and
expectations the same as today for simplicity.
The new linear modifier definition (proposal) will have these fields:
5 bits for log2 pitch alignment in bytes
5 bits for log2 h
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 10:00 AM Bas Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:51 PM Christian König <
> ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Am 07.08.24 um 22:33 schrieb Bas Nieuwenhuizen:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 10:25 PM Faith E
I don't see anything wrong with it
Reviewed-by: Faith Ekstrand
However, I'm not an AMDGPU developer so you probably want someone who knows
the amdgpu sync stuff to review as well.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 8:09 PM Bas Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
> For the rationale see the earlier
isable implicit sync on BOs wrt other
> + * submissions. */
> +#define AMDGPU_CS_NO_IMPLICIT_SYNC 1
>
In my UAPI patch, I also threw a comment on the BO flag documenting that
it's not a great thing to use. Some sort of documentation for future
generations would be nice
Oth
I think I am OK with this approach, even though I think mixing
> implicit and explicit sync is gross, and I want the pain that is implicit
> sync to just go away forever. :-)
>
So say we all...
~Faith
> - Joshie 🐸✨
>
>
> On August 7, 2024 4:39:32 PM GMT+01:00, Faith E
OP would make more sense if we want to back-port it but the
create flag made more sense to me from an API design PoV.
Signed-off-by: Faith Ekstrand
Cc: Alex Deucher
Cc: Christian König
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Michel Dänzer
Cc: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 3 +
