Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
Thanks a bunch, Konrad! On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Konrad Zemek wrote: > (Resending because of my failure to “reply all”) > > Hi, > > This has been fixed in Amarok master: > https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=amarok.git&a=commit&h=fec8817c530ce42b6485fdabff6051784b8d9904 > > Cheers, > Konrad > > O

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Konrad Zemek
(Resending because of my failure to “reply all”) Hi, This has been fixed in Amarok master: https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=amarok.git&a=commit&h=fec8817c530ce42b6485fdabff6051784b8d9904 Cheers, Konrad > O

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Konrad Zemek
Hi, This has been fixed in Amarok master: https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=amarok.git&a=commit&h=fec8817c530ce42b6485fdabff6051784b8d9904 Cheers, Konrad > On 16 Apr 2016, at 19:18, Michael Palimaka wrote:

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 17/04/16 02:46, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Michael Palimaka > wrote: >> On 16/04/16 20:26, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Michael Palimaka >>> wrote: A few cmake-based revdeps fail to build agains

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 16/04/16 20:26, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Michael Palimaka >> wrote: >>> >>> A few cmake-based revdeps fail to build against it because they do a >>> string comparison on the version

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 16/04/16 20:26, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > Hi all, > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Michael Palimaka > wrote: >> >> A few cmake-based revdeps fail to build against it because they do a >> string comparison on the version (STRLESS vs VERSION_LESS) so 1.10 >> appears too old, but it's an

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
Hi all, On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > A few cmake-based revdeps fail to build against it because they do a > string comparison on the version (STRLESS vs VERSION_LESS) so 1.10 > appears too old, but it's an easy fix. Strange, as that particular comparison is in the

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-15 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 15/04/16 09:57, Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > Hello folks, does anyone have opinions about or have tested the newest > taglib release? > > The Kubuntu team is being asked to package it, which is not likely to > happen this close to our LTS release, but we could put it in > backports, if it is a go