Re: GSoC draft application

2013-05-01 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 30. 4. 2013 vedant agarwala wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote: > > Vedant wrote: > > > They will contain classes and one that will implement the Provider > > > class. Data will be shared among the classes (in the TagGetter > > > namespace) probably via QExplicitlyShare

Re: GSoC draft application

2013-04-30 Thread vedant agarwala
Matej, Thank-you once again for your comments. I have drastically changed my proposal based on it. I didn't want you to read my entire application again so I just comment on some things that I have changed but I'm not so confident about. Regards, Vedant On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Matěj Lait

Re: GSoC draft application

2013-04-29 Thread vedant agarwala
Thanks a lot Matej for this in-depth review. I will address all the issues you pointed out and make another draft. Reagards, On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote: > On 29. 4. 2013 vedant agarwala wrote: > > In the meantime, I have updated my project proposal as shown below. Your

Re: GSoC draft application

2013-04-29 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 29. 4. 2013 vedant agarwala wrote: > In the meantime, I have updated my project proposal as shown below. Your > inputs are is still as valuable so please comment :) Hi, I'm very sorry to reply this late, I haven't unfortunately found time earlier, neither did any other developer apparently. A

Re: GSoC draft application

2013-04-28 Thread vedant agarwala
Matej, it seems you are doing all the work around here and applying for GSoC too Kudos. On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote: > On 28. 4. 2013 Lydia Pintscher wrote: > > Vedant Agarwala wrote: > > > Yes Myriam you are right. Sorry for the impatience. I missed the fact > that > >

Re: GSoC draft application

2013-04-28 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 28. 4. 2013 Lydia Pintscher wrote: > Vedant Agarwala wrote: > > Yes Myriam you are right. Sorry for the impatience. I missed the fact that > > you people must be very busy and in a different time-zone. > > Thank-you for correcting first timers like me. > > Has Vedant gotten feedback by now? N

Re: GSoC draft application

2013-04-28 Thread Lydia Pintscher
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:39 AM, vedant agarwala wrote: > Yes Myriam you are right. Sorry for the impatience. I missed the fact that > you people must be very busy and in a different time-zone. > Thank-you for correcting first timers like me. Has Vedant gotten feedback by now? Cheers Lydia --

Re: GSoC draft application

2013-04-25 Thread vedant agarwala
Yes Myriam you are right. Sorry for the impatience. I missed the fact that you people must be very busy and in a different time-zone. Thank-you for correcting first timers like me. Sincerely, Vedant. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:05 AM,

Re: GSoC draft application

2013-04-25 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:05 AM, vedant agarwala wrote: > Hello, > Below is the email I sent to amarok-devel but there was no reply. It must've > slipped through. Could you please have a look at my application before I can > submit it. How about having a tiny bit of patience? You only submitted t

Re: GSoC draft application

2013-04-24 Thread vedant agarwala
* Hello, I want to do the project Improving and modularizing tag guessingfor this year's Google Summer of Code. I request the amarok community to review my project proposal before I submit it. I'm a first

Re: GSoC draft application

2013-04-24 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 24. 4. 2013 vedant agarwala wrote: > Hello, > I want to do the project Improving and modularizing tag guessing for this > year's Google Summer of Code. I request the amarok community to review my > project proposal before I submit it: Link to Application I'm a first timer > for GSoC so any sugge