Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-30 Thread Nitul Datt
On 30 Oct 2014 20:30, "vedant agarwala" wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Nitul Datt wrote: >> >> Hey! >> >> On 10/30/14, vedant agarwala wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Nitul Datt wrote: >> > >> >> Hey! >> >> >> >> On 10/29/14, vedant agarwala wrote: >> >> > Then do

Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-30 Thread Nitul Datt
Hey! On 10/30/14, vedant agarwala wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Nitul Datt wrote: > >> Hey! >> >> On 10/29/14, vedant agarwala wrote: >> > Then do that. >> > >> > When you post a draft proposal on the mailing list post the entire text >> as >> > plain text rather than a link to a do

Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-29 Thread vedant agarwala
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Nitul Datt wrote: > Hey! > > On 10/29/14, vedant agarwala wrote: > > Then do that. > > > > When you post a draft proposal on the mailing list post the entire text > as > > plain text rather than a link to a doc. Easier to read and comment in > line. > > This is a

Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-29 Thread Nitul Datt
Hey! On 10/29/14, vedant agarwala wrote: > Then do that. > > When you post a draft proposal on the mailing list post the entire text as > plain text rather than a link to a doc. Easier to read and comment in line. This is a draft of my proposal to implement cue sheet support in Amarok. Suggestio

Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-29 Thread vedant agarwala
Then do that. When you post a draft proposal on the mailing list post the entire text as plain text rather than a link to a doc. Easier to read and comment in line. Regards, Vedant. On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Nitul Datt wrote: > > On 29 Oct 2014 13:06, "vedant agarwala" wrote: > > > > >

Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-29 Thread Nitul Datt
On 29 Oct 2014 13:06, "vedant agarwala" wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Nitul Datt wrote: >> >> Hey! >> >> On 10/28/14, vedant agarwala wrote: >> > Hello Nitul, >> > >> > Seems like you forgot to "reply to all" (as amarok-devel was not in your >> > recipients). >> > >> > On Tue,

Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-29 Thread vedant agarwala
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Nitul Datt wrote: > Hey! > > On 10/28/14, vedant agarwala wrote: > > Hello Nitul, > > > > Seems like you forgot to "reply to all" (as amarok-devel was not in your > > recipients). > > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Nitul Datt > wrote: > > > >> On 10/27/14

Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-28 Thread Nitul Datt
Hey! On 10/28/14, vedant agarwala wrote: > Hello Nitul, > > Seems like you forgot to "reply to all" (as amarok-devel was not in your > recipients). > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Nitul Datt wrote: > >> On 10/27/14, vedant agarwala wrote: >> > Hello Nitul, >> > >> > I agree with all that

Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-27 Thread vedant agarwala
Hello Nitul, Seems like you forgot to "reply to all" (as amarok-devel was not in your recipients). On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Nitul Datt wrote: > On 10/27/14, vedant agarwala wrote: > > Hello Nitul, > > > > I agree with all that Myriam has said. I should've waited for a go-ahead > > for

Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-27 Thread vedant agarwala
Hello Nitul, I agree with all that Myriam has said. I should've waited for a go-ahead for a senior Amarok member; if you remember I had mentioned that I was unable to get in touch with them. Sorry for rushing in and making you do some extra work. Take your time and pick a new project from the 2 m

Re: Draft SoK Proposal

2014-10-27 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
Hi Nitul, Thanks for your proposal, but I have some doubts about this. On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Nitul Datt wrote: > Hi! One thing which springs to mind is, suppose a user > wants to store a custom cover. Should that also be stored in the > filesystem mentioned in the specification or sho