Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
Thanks a bunch, Konrad! On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Konrad Zemek wrote: > (Resending because of my failure to “reply all”) > > Hi, > > This has been fixed in Amarok master: > https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=amarok.git&a=commit&h=fec8817c530ce42b6485fdabff6051784b8d9904 > > Cheers, > Konrad > > O

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Konrad Zemek
(Resending because of my failure to “reply all”) Hi, This has been fixed in Amarok master: https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=amarok.git&a=commit&h=fec8817c530ce42b6485fdabff6051784b8d9904 Cheers, Konrad > O

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Konrad Zemek
Hi, This has been fixed in Amarok master: https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=amarok.git&a=commit&h=fec8817c530ce42b6485fdabff6051784b8d9904 Cheers, Konrad > On 16 Apr 2016, at 19:18, Michael Palimaka wrote:

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 17/04/16 02:46, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Michael Palimaka > wrote: >> On 16/04/16 20:26, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Michael Palimaka >>> wrote: A few cmake-based revdeps fail to build agains

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 16/04/16 20:26, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Michael Palimaka >> wrote: >>> >>> A few cmake-based revdeps fail to build against it because they do a >>> string comparison on the version

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 16/04/16 20:26, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > Hi all, > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Michael Palimaka > wrote: >> >> A few cmake-based revdeps fail to build against it because they do a >> string comparison on the version (STRLESS vs VERSION_LESS) so 1.10 >> appears too old, but it's an

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-16 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
Hi all, On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > A few cmake-based revdeps fail to build against it because they do a > string comparison on the version (STRLESS vs VERSION_LESS) so 1.10 > appears too old, but it's an easy fix. Strange, as that particular comparison is in the

Re: New taglib v1.10

2016-04-15 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 15/04/16 09:57, Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > Hello folks, does anyone have opinions about or have tested the newest > taglib release? > > The Kubuntu team is being asked to package it, which is not likely to > happen this close to our LTS release, but we could put it in > backports, if it is a go

New taglib v1.10

2016-04-14 Thread Valorie Zimmerman
Hello folks, does anyone have opinions about or have tested the newest taglib release? The Kubuntu team is being asked to package it, which is not likely to happen this close to our LTS release, but we could put it in backports, if it is a good idea https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tagli