On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Konrad Zemek
wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> 2014-12-14 13:02 GMT+01:00 Myriam Schweingruber :
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
> >> > gmock sources are still not packaged by distributio
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi all,
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
>>
>> On 13. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
>> > gmock sources are still not packaged by distributions, and compiling
>> > Amarok with tests on is still troubl
Hi Matěj,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
>
> On 14. 12. 2014 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> > Can we please make a release soon, Matěj?
>
> That's what I wanted to do for ages, but having a full-time job and
> furnishing
> a flat takes more time than I've ever expected. :-|
2014-12-14 16:07 GMT+01:00 Matěj Laitl :
> On 14. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
>> Matěj Laitl wrote:
>> > How big is tarballed gtest + gmock? Can we just embed them in our release
>> > tarballs? Else we can create something like
>> > amarok-testlibs-$version.tar.bz2, but that would be more work and
On 14. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
> Matěj Laitl wrote:
> > How big is tarballed gtest + gmock? Can we just embed them in our release
> > tarballs? Else we can create something like
> > amarok-testlibs-$version.tar.bz2, but that would be more work and effort.
>
> tarred and bzipped, the repos tak
2014-12-14 13:38 GMT+01:00 Matěj Laitl :
> On 14. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
>> >> Git submodule approach looks promising, however I have some concerns:
>> >> a) this makes test depend on 'your' github repositories; we cannot
>> >> guarantee they won't go away etc.
>> >> b) this makes testing
On 14. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
> >> Git submodule approach looks promising, however I have some concerns:
> >> a) this makes test depend on 'your' github repositories; we cannot
> >> guarantee they won't go away etc.
> >> b) this makes testing Amarok require internet connection, at least
>
On 14. 12. 2014 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> Can we please make a release soon, Matěj?
That's what I wanted to do for ages, but having a full-time job and furnishing
a flat takes more time than I've ever expected. :-|
I still plan & want to do it, but if someone is faster than me (Ralf?
Marke
Hey,
2014-12-14 13:02 GMT+01:00 Myriam Schweingruber :
> Hi all,
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
>>
>> On 13. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
>> > gmock sources are still not packaged by distributions, and compiling
>> > Amarok with tests on is still troublesome (I still u
Hi all,
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
>
> On 13. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
> > gmock sources are still not packaged by distributions, and compiling
> > Amarok with tests on is still troublesome (I still use a cmake-gui
> > based approach where I manually set paths to my
On 13. 12. 2014 Konrad Zemek wrote:
> gmock sources are still not packaged by distributions, and compiling
> Amarok with tests on is still troublesome (I still use a cmake-gui
> based approach where I manually set paths to my pre-compiled gmock
> lib, as I outlined in an email some months ago).
>
Hey everyone,
gmock sources are still not packaged by distributions, and compiling
Amarok with tests on is still troublesome (I still use a cmake-gui
based approach where I manually set paths to my pre-compiled gmock
lib, as I outlined in an email some months ago).
I solved the problem through th
12 matches
Mail list logo
