On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Bart Cerneels wrote:
> Couldn't the pulseaudio stuff be considered platform integration?
Yes.
> I
> would be happy enough with a string indication which platform phonon
> and it's backends are using. example: "linux (pulseaudio)", "linux
> (ALSA)", "Windows (Dire
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
>>> /** @returns \c true when this backend was provided by a platform plugin
>>> */
>>> bool isPlatformProvided() const;
>>
>> Perhaps this has sense to people who known how Phono
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Matěj Laitl wrote:
>> /** @returns \c true when this backend was provided by a platform plugin
>> */
>> bool isPlatformProvided() const;
>
> Perhaps this has sense to people who known how Phonon is implemented in Qt,
> but I don't understand what "provid
On 9. 9. 2012 Harald Sitter wrote:
> attached is a proposed api for phonon backend information as both
> amarok and tomahawk have diagnostics functionality that needs accurate
> information on the loaded backend. this addition would would address
> [1].
>
> feedback would be much appreciated.
>
>
ahoyahoy
attached is a proposed api for phonon backend information as both
amarok and tomahawk have diagnostics functionality that needs accurate
information on the loaded backend. this addition would would address
[1].
feedback would be much appreciated.
implementation-wise this is a no-brainer
