FYI
Please everybody: keep both addresses when replying
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matěj Laitl
Date: Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: phonon5 and the descriptors
To: "For discussion of multimedia (sound/video) issues under KDE"
On 8. 10. 2013 Harald Sitter wrote:
>
Hey,
2013/10/8 Harald Sitter
> 1) thinking of QML integration aforementioned almost-POD will probably
> have to be wrapped by a qobject to get sane code in QML, so should we
> perhaps make it a QObject to begin with? (this would give us a free
> property implementation but also increase the size
aloha
I am looking for some input regarding the future of objectdescriptions
in phonon5.
++
tldr: should objects describing a property/setting of phonon objects
such as Subtitle/AudioOutputDevice/AudioChannel be QObjects; if not,
should they be QSharedData considering they are comprised of
impli
