Re: Introduction: Season of KDE 2013

2013-08-11 Thread Avik Pal
Hi Vedant, Best of luck. Avik Pal Bengal Engineering & Science University,Shibpur Github:https://github.com/avikpal IRC:- irc://freenode/avikp,isnick On 12 August 2013 02:14, vedant agarwala wrote: > Yes Avik I am. > I have submitted my proposal already. Very similar to this one. And Mark

Re: Introduction: Season of KDE 2013

2013-08-11 Thread Avik Pal
Hello Vedant, Thanks for your reply. I would like to ask you one question, are you going to go ahead with this project in this years' season of KDE? Avik Pal Bengal Engineering & Science University,Shibpur Github:https://github.com/avikpal IRC:- irc://freenode/avikp,isnick On 12 August 2

Re: Introduction: Season of KDE 2013

2013-08-11 Thread vedant agarwala
Yes Avik I am. I have submitted my proposal already. Very similar to this one. And Mark Kretschmann has volunteered to mentor me. Regards, Vedant On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Avik Pal wrote: > Hello Vedant, > Thanks for your reply. I would like to ask you one question, are > you go

Re: Introduction: Season of KDE 2013

2013-08-11 Thread vedant agarwala
Hello Avik, Like you, I am another Season of KDE aspirant. I had submitted this proposal as a Google Summer of Code project: https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/vedant/1 It contains all the necessary details (from my point of view of-course) you would need. Reg

Re: Review Request 112023: Disable move/copy actions for non-writeable UMS collections.

2013-08-11 Thread Frank Meerkoetter
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112023/ --- (Updated Aug. 11, 2013, 8:08 p.m.) Review request for Amarok. Descriptio

Review Request 112023: Disable move/copy actions for non-writeable UMS collections.

2013-08-11 Thread Frank Meerkoetter
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112023/ --- Review request for Amarok. Description --- Diffs - src/browse

Re: Review Request 111991: Better handling of non-writeable UMS collections

2013-08-11 Thread Mark Kretschmann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111991/#review37511 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Mark Kretschmann On Aug. 11, 2013, 11:1

Re: Review Request 111991: Better handling of non-writeable UMS collections

2013-08-11 Thread Konrad Zemek
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111991/#review37509 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Konrad Zemek On Aug. 11, 2013, 11:17 a.

Re: Review Request 111991: Better handling of non-writeable UMS collections

2013-08-11 Thread Frank Meerkoetter
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111991/ --- (Updated Aug. 11, 2013, 11:17 a.m.) Review request for Amarok. Changes -

Introduction: Season of KDE 2013

2013-08-11 Thread Avik Pal
Hi, I am Avik Pal, undergraduate student of computer science at the Bengal Engineering & Science University, Shibpur. I was going through the season of KDE website and the Amarok project drew my attention especially the project *Improving and modularizing tag guessing *which was listed as an id

Re: Review Request 111991: Better handling of non-writeable UMS collections

2013-08-11 Thread Mark Kretschmann
> On Aug. 10, 2013, 7:26 p.m., Mark Kretschmann wrote: > > I'm not so sure about the warning that is shown when an unwritable UMS > > collection is loaded. First of all it seems to me this would belong on a > > higher level, as other collections could be read-only as well. Second, I'm > > not

Re: Review Request 111991: Better handling of non-writeable UMS collections

2013-08-11 Thread Frank Meerkoetter
> On Aug. 10, 2013, 7:26 p.m., Mark Kretschmann wrote: > > I'm not so sure about the warning that is shown when an unwritable UMS > > collection is loaded. First of all it seems to me this would belong on a > > higher level, as other collections could be read-only as well. Second, I'm > > not

Re: Review Request 111991: Better handling of non-writeable UMS collections

2013-08-11 Thread Frank Meerkoetter
> On Aug. 10, 2013, 7:26 p.m., Mark Kretschmann wrote: > > I'm not so sure about the warning that is shown when an unwritable UMS > > collection is loaded. First of all it seems to me this would belong on a > > higher level, as other collections could be read-only as well. Second, I'm > > not