Re: GSoC Application Review

2013-05-02 Thread Anmol Ahuja
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote: > On 2. 5. 2013 Anmol Ahuja wrote: > > Short description: My > > proposal aims at revamping the Amarok scripting interface, and adding an > > intuitive Script Creator graphical application allowing easy script > > creation by non-coders and coder

Re: GSoC Application Review

2013-05-02 Thread Anmol Ahuja
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote: > On 30. 4. 2013 Anmol Ahuja wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Matěj Laitl wrote: > > > Right, although I'd remove the "porting popular A 1.4 scripts" - there > are > > > more useful things you'll be able to do, like promoting Amarok >

Re: Amarok 3 architecture brainstorm (was: GSoC considerations)

2013-05-02 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 12. 4. 2013 Edward Toroshchin wrote: > First of all, thanks for reading everything I've written under > intoxication. And for taking seriously the need of designing the > architecture for the future. > > You also present some good ideas. However, I am sure that the process > split is compatible

Re: Fwd: GSoC proposal review

2013-05-02 Thread Matěj Laitl
On 30. 4. 2013 Abhinandan Ramprasath wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Matěj Laitl wrote: > > On 28. 4. 2013 Abhinandan Ramprasath wrote: > > Every bugfix counts - we need to know that students are capable of > > patching, building, reading code, respecting style etc. > > I have attempted