Fwd: GSoC draft application

Hello, Below is the email I sent to amarok-devel but there was no reply. It must've slipped through. Could you please have a look at my application before I can submit it. And, I want to ask, what is meant by "ffmpeg + libofa to Phonon + chromaprint (library to compute AcoustIDs) Viability of Phono

Outdated MediaDeviceFramework

While working on my gsoc proposal I did some research on Collections and I am not sure that I understand why MediaDeviceFramework is outdated (it states in few places, but without mentioning any particular reason). Maybe there is some additional info somewhere and I just did not find it? I've look

Re: GSoC application review - reimplementing personal metadata importers

On 24.04.2013 13:19, Matěj Laitl wrote: Sounds good, except for the renaming. StatSyncing::ITunesProvider sounds well for both cases. I actually had a conception to leave importers where they are, or in a directory called simply importers. Well, for class names I'd stick to nomenclature of the

Re: Review Request 110139: Small bugfixes. Fixes clang warnings.

> On April 24, 2013, 12:47 p.m., Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > > Which exact bugs does that fix? are those reported on http://bugs.kde.org? > > Then please add the "BUG: " handler and "FIXED-IN: 2.8" handler > > to it as well :) None of these bugs are reported in bugs.kde.org (at least I could

Re: Review Request 110139: Small bugfixes. Fixes clang warnings.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110139/#review31493 --- Which exact bugs does that fix? are those reported on http://bu

Re: GSoC application review - reimplementing personal metadata importers

On 24. 4. 2013 Konrad Zemek wrote: > On 22.04.2013 14:56, Matěj Laitl wrote: > > I see, good luck with your exams! The deadline for proposals is May 3, so > > maybe you'll manage to at least submit a small change by then. > > I've just submitted a small patch which just "happened" as I was working

Re: GSoC draft application

* Hello, I want to do the project Improving and modularizing tag guessingfor this year's Google Summer of Code. I request the amarok community to review my project proposal before I submit it. I'm a first

Re: GSoC draft application

On 24. 4. 2013 vedant agarwala wrote: > Hello, > I want to do the project Improving and modularizing tag guessing for this > year's Google Summer of Code. I request the amarok community to review my > project proposal before I submit it: Link to Application I'm a first timer > for GSoC so any sugge

Re: GSoC application review - reimplementing personal metadata importers

On 22.04.2013 14:56, Matěj Laitl wrote: On 21. 4. 2013 Konrad Zemek wrote: 2013/4/20 Matěj Laitl : On 20. 4. 2013 Konrad Zemek wrote: I think there are no importer tests, please check it and then be more certain in the proposal. I did actually check that, but the lack of tests is a bit unusual

GSoC draft application

* Hello, I want to do the project Improving and modularizing tag guessingfor this year's Google Summer of Code. I request the amarok community to review my project proposal before I submit it: Link to Appli