Hey,
...
But, unfortunately, I must say that I do not intend to integrate
>> libtomahawk with Amarok anymore. Please, don't get me wrong. I'm not
>> saying that all my GSoC work was in vain and that the confidence that
>> everyone had in me was an error. In fact, I have been trying to separate
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109781/
---
(Updated March 31, 2013, 4:29 a.m.)
Review request for Amarok.
Descripti
> On March 28, 2013, 4:44 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote:
> > Is there a wish request or any other motivation to implement this feature?
> > I don't see many reasons why user should care that the lyrics have been
> > just downloaded or already cached. On the other hand, user may want to know
> > whet
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109585/
---
(Updated March 30, 2013, 11:03 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109585/#review30103
---
This review has been submitted with commit
d92e270ad727823580b
> On March 28, 2013, 12:16 a.m., Matěj Laitl wrote:
> > Hmmm, I'm apparently able to update the diff, please disregard the attached
> > file.
> >
> > Please have a look a differences between v11 and v12, most of them are
> > style fixes or cleanups, but it also boasts fixes for a couple of sub
