On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Philipp Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just a little status update on the kio-mtp progress. The Project is now in
> playground. You can find it here:
>
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/base/kio-mtp
>
> The most important changes:
> - More stability
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106550/
---
Review request for Amarok.
Description
---
MetaFile::Track: only prov
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106494/#review19371
---
This review has been submitted with commit
0818d6ace981f302bf1
Hi all,
just a little status update on the kio-mtp progress. The Project is now in
playground. You can find it here:
https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/base/kio-mtp
The most important changes:
- More stability
- More speed thanks to caching, especially when copying lots of small fil
On 09/23/2012 03:03 PM, Bart Cerneels wrote:
> Removing our project founder
I didn't see an ocs.addFounder().
> from the authors list without discussing
> it is not just unfriendly, it's downright hostile.
It's not hostile at all. I was applying the same standards to Mark as to
everyone else. In
On 09/23/2012 02:17 AM, Bart Cerneels wrote:
> The currently active Amarok team has defined the authors list to
> contain current contributors that have ownership (written it or
> maintaining it for a while) of amarok components or non-coding
> contributions to the project. As far as I can tell the
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Alex Fiestas wrote:
> Hey...
>
> Sorry if this topic wasn't one to joke about, yesterday night I was told of
> the tensions going on because of the changes and it seemed that a little
> joke will chill the environment a little bit.
>
> If you take a look at the ye
Hey...
Sorry if this topic wasn't one to joke about, yesterday night I was told of
the tensions going on because of the changes and it seemed that a little
joke will chill the environment a little bit.
If you take a look at the year (2020) or at few words (rey means king) it
is clearly seen that
Heya,
Bart Cerneels wrote:
> The currently active Amarok team
+ ", at least the part who was able to attend Randa, "
> As far as I can tell there is no legal reason to list all past contributors
> as authors.
It's not about legal reasons. For legal reasons the copyright
headers in the source
