Re: Proposal for QML Context View

2012-03-30 Thread Teo Mrnjavac
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:32, Saurabh Sood wrote: > Hi, > I finally finished my proposal for QMLify Amarok Context View and > submitted it on Melange. It would be great if it could be reviewed, > and changes suggested. > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/saurabhso

Re: Review Request: Prevent amarok from merging tracks with same title but different track numbers

2012-03-30 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104423/#review12035 --- This review has been submitted with commit 6eab9b94917da745b8c

Proposal for QML Context View

2012-03-30 Thread Saurabh Sood
Hi, I finally finished my proposal for QMLify Amarok Context View and submitted it on Melange. It would be great if it could be reviewed, and changes suggested. http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/saurabhsood91/7002 Regards,. Saurabh __

gsoc-2012

2012-03-30 Thread Vishnu Kumaar
hi amarok im interested in gsoc -2012 Social music - Tomahawk features in Amarok  im doing my undergrad(2nd yr) .  i really want to grow as a programmer and i  believe that the project and  gsoc can help me with that  Considering i made a music player (using trend mapping, . net and a dbms ) i  

GSoC Proposal: Integrate Spotify into Amarok

2012-03-30 Thread OxFAN
Hi there, My name is Zhengliang Feng, and I'm interested in participating Google Summer of Code this year. Here's my proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PcuR63NXonbBbbaomDwqazCYHbfYsHDPduNuHFyu0IU/edit?pli=1 I did a project with Qt last year, but I didn't put it (over 30k lines of C++ c

[Bug 296423] Amarok fails to compile with taglib from master

2012-03-30 Thread Chris Burel
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296423 --- Comment #1 from Chris Burel --- Created attachment 70001 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=70001&action=edit Include tmap.h to fix compile of Amarok This is because a new typedef was introduced, using a "Map". But the "Map" type is not

Participating in the GSoC

2012-03-30 Thread Xavier Claude
Hello, I'm interesting in joining the Google summer of code. I hope it's not too late. I'm using KDE for more than 5 years and I'm a member of the French translation team, that's why I choose KDE as the GSoc organization. I'm a student in computer science in Belgium, I'm in the thir

Re: Review Request: Prevent amarok from merging tracks with same title but different track numbers

2012-03-30 Thread Alexey Neyman
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104423/ --- (Updated March 29, 2012, 7:01 a.m.) Review request for Amarok. Changes -

Re: Amarok idea need feedback

2012-03-30 Thread Alexander Potashev
Hi Igor, (Teo,) Sorry for the late response - I am not an Amarok developer, so I usually do not read messages from this mailing list. The idea of full intergration of vk.com into Amarok sounds interesting. The following are some existing applications, scripts and libraries that implement intergra

Re: Tomahawk features

2012-03-30 Thread Teo Mrnjavac
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 20:57, Igor Vileikis wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Maybe we haven't been clear enough: we need a completely >> Tomahawk-compatible feature. It should work like Tomahawk and also >> look kinda reminescent of Tomahawk. Since Tomahawk is Free software, >> and Amarok is Free software,

Re: Tomahawk features in Amarok Proposal

2012-03-30 Thread Teo Mrnjavac
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:49, Stefan Derkits wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > one thing you should add to your proposal: > > If you are experienced in developing features that require > communication with more than one "project partner" (and I know you > are, c

Re: Amarok idea Tomahawk features

2012-03-30 Thread Teo Mrnjavac
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 18:52, Igor Vileikis wrote: > Hi, > Can you explain me what directly should my idea have to saticfy the > conditions of participating GSoC 2012? Because I haven't understood is my > proposal acceptable or not. If there are any requirements in some details > which you want t