On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 20:17, sandeep wrote:
> I've submitted a review request for the filename configuration. Now, I've
> added some extra code to replace the layout with the actual data - for
> example replace %artist with the artist's name. Where should this code be
> inserted? I've kept it i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100686/#review1544
---
Dialog needs to be improved and the available tokens (%bla) need
I've read this a couple of times:
All songs must be:
(
(
30% rating greater than 3 stars
30% rating greater than 4 stars
60% playcount equals 0
)
and
Unique
and
Not: genre equals audiobook
)
and it still doesn't make sense
>From a layman's point of view, I'd expect t
On Sunday 20 February 2011 22:58:51 you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the immediate reply.
>
> 2011/2/21 Daniel Dewald
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Take my good advice and don't put any more work into this. Phonon's Audio
> > Data
> > Output is not working in 90% of all phonon Backends and from what I've
>
If I might put my 2 cents...
I think the key reason of the problem could be rephrased into:
*Its is being done inside out*
The problem is that user has FIRST select bias, LATER put the settings in -
like click plus sign and add artist bias, then type in artist name, then set
the proportion then
> On Feb. 8, 2011, 2:36 a.m., Andy Coder wrote:
> > This seems reasonable enough to me. Especially since JsonQt was used
> > because it was already hanging around in the source tree, and availability
> > of friendly JSON libraries in package repos wasn't what it is today.
> > However, if the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100607/
---
(Updated Feb. 20, 2011, 10:51 p.m.)
Review request for Amarok.
Changes
-
Hi,
thanks for the immediate reply.
2011/2/21 Daniel Dewald
> Hi,
>
> Take my good advice and don't put any more work into this. Phonon's Audio
> Data
> Output is not working in 90% of all phonon Backends and from what I've
> heard
> so far will not be working in any future. I've already design
Running the bindings test results in:
'symbol lookup error:
/home/shaun/qt4/plugins/script/libqtscript_core.so.1.0.0: undefined
symbol: _Z50qtscript_initialize_com_trolltech_qt_core_bindingsR12QScriptValue'
ldd results in (most importantly): libQtScript.so.4 =>
/home/shaun/qt4/lib/libQtScript.
2011/2/20 Daniel Dewald :
> Hi,
>
> Take my good advice and don't put any more work into this. Phonon's Audio Data
> Output is not working in 90% of all phonon Backends and from what I've heard
> so far will not be working in any future. I've already designed and
> implemented a working OpenGL Amar
Hi,
Take my good advice and don't put any more work into this. Phonon's Audio Data
Output is not working in 90% of all phonon Backends and from what I've heard
so far will not be working in any future. I've already designed and
implemented a working OpenGL Amarok applet and realized a spectrum
Hi,
in case anyone wants to help Shaun... :)
That's the error he gets:
> xdarklight: well, now I receive ./bindingstest: symbol lookup
error: /home/shaun/qt4/plugins/script/libqtscript_core.so.1.0.0: undefined
symbol: _Z50qtscript_initialize_com_trolltech_qt_core_bindingsR12QScriptValue
I have
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:35, Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
>> Heya :)
>>
>> I've set up a doodle to find a good time for a meeting. Please fill it
>> out within the next 48h if you want to participate.
>> http://www.doodle.com/2vwypm3nik945gh
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> Heya :)
>
> I've set up a doodle to find a good time for a meeting. Please fill it
> out within the next 48h if you want to participate.
> http://www.doodle.com/2vwypm3nik945ghu I'll close the poll in 48h.
> At the meeting I'd like to go t
Heya :)
I've set up a doodle to find a good time for a meeting. Please fill it
out within the next 48h if you want to participate.
http://www.doodle.com/2vwypm3nik945ghu I'll close the poll in 48h.
At the meeting I'd like to go through the questions and answers and
see if something is missing and
> On Feb. 19, 2011, 7:40 p.m., Leo Franchi wrote:
> > So I'm against merging this review request as it is right now. However, I
> > don't think I am in any place to reject completely a feature like this
> > since I have not been actively developing or improving the current
> > situation when i
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> Heya folks :)
>
> One of the points that became very clear during the analysis for my
> thesis was that we need to work on defining our vision and mission
> more clearly. To do this I have prepared a wiki page with a few
> questions that sh
17 matches
Mail list logo
