On 11/13/2010 03:07 PM, Leo Franchi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Below are my observations too, just to see if other users' compare.
>
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Mikko C. wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I found some time to run some tests with the new scanner.
>>
>> Amarok from git master of today:
>> Full resc
> On 2010-11-15 15:33:36, Ralf Engels wrote:
> > Regarding the noCompilation of the collection scanner.
> > Actually this makes sense.
> >
> > The collection scanner has a lot of heuristics for detecting if an album is
> > a compilation.
> > However we also have a compilation tag.
> > If the ta
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100135/
---
(Updated 2010-11-16 11:38:35.670498)
Review request for Amarok.
Summary
> On 2010-11-15 15:33:36, Ralf Engels wrote:
> > Regarding the noCompilation of the collection scanner.
> > Actually this makes sense.
> >
> > The collection scanner has a lot of heuristics for detecting if an album is
> > a compilation.
> > However we also have a compilation tag.
> > If the ta
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100135/
---
(Updated 2010-11-16 11:21:17.152719)
Review request for Amarok.
Changes
