Re: [Bug 561035] Re: gwibber-service crashed with TypeError in _fetch()

2010-07-21 Thread burlingk
Sorry for the delayed response, I got really busy for a while. Many system updates later, I have tried gwibber again, and it seems to work ok. :) On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Kamus wrote: > please reopened again if you encounter that this issue is still > occurring in latest release of gwib

Re: [Bug 544471] Re: Download unavailable in several countries

2010-04-21 Thread burlingk
Do they plan to do an Asia or Japan store any time soon? :-) The music in the international store is cool, but I would love to see some JPOP. ^_^ -- Download unavailable in several countries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 560085] Re: Magnatune Plugin does not allow me to enter user name

2010-04-18 Thread burlingk
I was just going to add this link: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615658 Looks like someone beat me to it though by posting the direct info instead of the link. :) -- Magnatune Plugin does not allow me to enter user name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560085 You received this bug no

[Bug 560085] Re: Magnatune Plugin does not allow me to enter user name

2010-04-18 Thread burlingk
I was just going to add this link: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615658 Looks like someone beat me to it though by posting the direct info instead of the link. :) -- Magnatune Plugin does not allow me to enter user name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560085 You received this bug no

[Bug 553745] Re: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in ply_event_loop_process_pending_events()

2010-04-18 Thread burlingk
I got this on a Toshiba Satalite with ATI graphics and AMD64, and it was not the first reboot after an upgrade. -- plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in ply_event_loop_process_pending_events() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 560085] Re: Magnatune Plugin does not allow me to enter user name

2010-04-10 Thread burlingk
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43689285/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GConfNonDefault.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43689286/GConfNonDefault.txt ** Attachment added: "GstreamerVersions.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43689287/Gstre

[Bug 560085] Re: Magnatune Plugin does not allow me to enter user name

2010-04-10 Thread burlingk
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43689285/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GConfNonDefault.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43689286/GConfNonDefault.txt ** Attachment added: "GstreamerVersions.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43689287/Gstre

[Bug 560085] [NEW] Magnatune Plugin does not allow me to enter user name

2010-04-10 Thread burlingk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox When I go to the plugin settings in Lucid beta, the Magnatune plugin does not let me enter my username or password. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: rhythmbox 0.12.8-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-server

[Bug 560085] [NEW] Magnatune Plugin does not allow me to enter user name

2010-04-10 Thread burlingk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox When I go to the plugin settings in Lucid beta, the Magnatune plugin does not let me enter my username or password. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: rhythmbox 0.12.8-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-server

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-19 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:00 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > > I totally agree here. (Of course, I think the Free Software vs. > Proprietary Software "war

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:26 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: grub chainloader > > I'm happy to leave the info vs man flamewar for someone else, > but what I _don't_ like is

RE: [gentoo-user] ADSL network

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
> > -Original Message- > From: sain yan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 2:11 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] ADSL network > > Hi > > My box can`t link to internet , I using rp-pppoe > I think it work fine, when run pppoe-start I get >

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:42 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > > If you don't like the GPLv3, you probably didn't > *really* like the GPLv2 and might be mo

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Stroller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:59 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > > > Routers: The router issue was probably missed by a number of people simply because in the states it

RE: [gentoo-user] [OT] English sucks (was: Re: Installation problems)

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hendrik Boom > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 8:35 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] [OT] English sucks (was: Re: > Installation problems) > > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:44:32 +0100, Mik

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-18 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: b.n. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 6:29 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > > > Personally I'm quite happy with both GPLv2 and GPLv3. > Frankly, my only > real, serious concern is the

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Edenfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:30 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > > I'm not sure why that seems to be such a problem for GPL > proponents to > admit. It's perfectly

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:27 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > > > More than that -- they don't allow the "compromised" devices > to boot. Of course, tha

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Volker Armin Hemmann > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 1:20 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > > > On Dienstag, 17. Juli 2007, Abraham Marín Pérez wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Volker Armin Hemmann > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 1:19 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > > > On Dienstag, 17. Juli 2007, Stroller wrote: > > > I believe that even Linus - who is n

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Abraham Marín Pérez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 7:43 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-17 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Henk Boom > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:08 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > > > On 16/07/07, Volker Armin Hemmann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > b

RE: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3??

2007-07-15 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Jerry McBride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 7:11 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] 2 to 3?? > Anyone aware of any plans for Gentoo/Portage moving to the > gpl3.0 license? I haven't heard anything, but

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-06-09 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Regis Decamps > Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 8:03 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question > > > Florian Philipp wrote: > > Am Dienstag 15 Mai 2007 02:45 schrieb [EMAIL PROT

[gentoo-user] The Gentoo-User mailing list

2007-06-09 Thread burlingk
Who would I contact with suggestions or concerns about the mailing list?

RE: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition

2007-06-08 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Alan McKinnon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 12:48 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition > > > On Friday 08 June 2007, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > On Freit

RE: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition

2007-06-08 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Hemmann, Volker Armin > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 12:19 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving linux system to another partition > > > On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Aleksey Kunitskiy wrote: > >

RE: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 8:00 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid > > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Sec

RE: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-05 Thread burlingk
Ok, my two cents on the matter. I am still new enough to the community to be considered an outsider, so here is an outsider's perspective. I hope not to step on toes, but it will probably happen anyway. First: Cosmetic things, i.e. user interface issues, pretty pictures, and things that effec

RE: [gentoo-user] Install Using another System

2007-06-05 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Florian Philipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 5:53 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Install Using another System > > > Am Montag 04 Juni 2007 23:28 schrieb darren kirby: > > quoth the Randy Barlow

RE: [gentoo-user] Japanese Support

2007-06-03 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: PaulNM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 1:41 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Japanese Support > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is there a howto for Japanese support in Gentoo? > > > > > > > Ho

RE: [gentoo-user] Help me reboot X

2007-06-03 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Kevin O'Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:17 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] Help me reboot X > > Can somebody help me stop and restart X? I'm using kdm for login. > > -- > Kevin O'Gorman, PhD

RE: [gentoo-user] Problem with yelp while doing --update world

2007-06-03 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Renat Golubchyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 6:33 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with yelp while doing > --update world > > > On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 15:38:07 -0400 John covici <[EMAIL PROTE

[gentoo-user] Japanese Support

2007-06-02 Thread burlingk
Is there a howto for Japanese support in Gentoo?

RE: [gentoo-user] Shutdown -h now is not powering down system.

2007-05-31 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Marz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:40 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Shutdown -h now is not powering > down system. > > > No. But, I will try it now. I'll let you know if it works in

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20

2007-05-31 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Ali Polatel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 10:46 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yazmış: > > I have seen many people mentioning Union

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20

2007-05-31 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 9:29 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20 > > > Ali Polatel wrote: > > You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm >

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Test!

2007-05-29 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Ryan Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 10:40 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Test! > > > On 5/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > >

RE: [gentoo-user] Ebuilds for the following packages are either all masked or don't exist

2007-05-29 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 5:37 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] Ebuilds for the following packages are > either all masked or don't exist > > > Calculating world dependencies - > !!

RE: [gentoo-user] OT: An XML Question

2007-05-29 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Galevsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 4:21 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: An XML Question > > > Hi, > > you can learn the xml concepts at http://www.w3schools.com/. > Then, depending on th

[gentoo-user] OT: An XML Question

2007-05-28 Thread burlingk
Are there any really good XML tutorials on the web, or perhaps a book that is actually useful? Also, which libs do people preffer for dealing with XML? I am contemplating messing arround with XML for data files for a project I want to mess with. The project would involve loading objects into

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Test!

2007-05-28 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: dark85x [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 2:06 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Test! > > > On Monday 28 May 2007 19:04:16 Tobias Heinlein wrote: > > Hi there! > > > > eMails rock! > > irc > email > -

RE: [gentoo-user] no audio

2007-05-27 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: maxim wexler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 10:09 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] no audio > > > Hi group, > > For a 2.6.19.5 kernel on a PIII w/SBLive soundcard > using snd-emu10k1 module. I emerged al

RE: [gentoo-user] portage lags behind?

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: b.n. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 6:28 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage lags behind? > > > maxim wexler ha scritto: > > How do I tell portage to go for the latest stable pkg > > without h

RE: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Alfredsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:55 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the > Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo. > > > On Friday 25 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

RE: [gentoo-user] Changing libaries

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Florian Philipp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:20 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] Changing libaries > > > Hi! > > I've already asked this question on gentoo-user-de but I've > got no - let's > say

RE: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Denis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:32 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the > Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo. > > > > > What makes the difference between a 64 bit kernel,

RE: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 6:28 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the > Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo. > > > On Friday 25 May 2007 04:09:00 [EMAI

RE: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 5:07 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the > Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo. > > > On Friday 25 May 2007 02:12:49 [EMAI

RE: [gentoo-user] which -march flag to pick for Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf?

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Randy Barlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 4:23 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] which -march flag to pick for > Intel Core 2 Duo in make.conf? > > If you are using a lot of memory in your computa

[gentoo-user] Semi OT: 64 bit processors, the Linux Kernel, and x86 Gentoo.

2007-05-25 Thread burlingk
Due to issues with some of the software I am wanting to run, when it is run under the AMD64 bit version of Gentoo (one of which is Blender, which I hope will be properly stable soon), I am planning to run x86 Gentoo (With the i686 stage3) on an AMD64 processor. My question is this, If I enabel 64

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Hemmann, Volker Armin > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:58 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question > > > On Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2007, Dale wrote: > > Hemmann, Volker Armin

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Dan Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:27 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question > > > Not to mention you will spend much longer waiting for > everything to downlo

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
> > > > That won't work, portage will complain that there is a problem with > > our world file and bail out. > > Ah, thanks. I didn't realize emerge was unhappy with > packages in world which are not already installed. > > > Put the packages you want in a file like world then do > > "emerge -

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Dan Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:27 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question > > > On Tue, 22 May 2007 16:13:11 +0900 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The n

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-22 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Hemmann, Volker Armin > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:02 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question > > That would also let me make sure that I have an up to date portage

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Hemmann, Volker Armin > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 3:34 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question > > > On Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Ok, Here g

RE: [gentoo-user] emerge -f

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:26 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -f > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If I use emerge -f on a package, will it fetch that packaged > > dependencies

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Naga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:02 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question > > > According to some devs on -dev (IRC) last night about 50 GiB > if you want _all_ > d

[gentoo-user] emerge -f

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
If I use emerge -f on a package, will it fetch that packaged dependencies as well? For instance, if I use 'emerge -f xorg-x11', will it check the system, then download everything that it needs to install that package? If I were to use 'emerge -uf world', would there be a huge number of packaged d

RE: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:30 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question > > > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 13:06 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Ok, Here goes

[gentoo-user] A Theoretical install Question

2007-05-21 Thread burlingk
Ok, Here goes... How large is the package archive for gentoo, assuming a full copy of the portage tree, and all of the source tarballs in the distfiles directory of the average server? Would it be possible to draw down the whole archive all in one shot using wget or similar, dump it all into

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs]

2007-05-20 Thread burlingk
> Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > The circular dependencies between Xserver and drivers do not come > > from upstream. They're artificial. If we just want an simple-to-use > > package which gets the Xserver *and* drivers based on useflags > > (which IMHO is an good idea), it's quite trivial to do this b

RE: [solved] Re: [gentoo-user] Xinerama on 945GM: "Set VBE mode failed"

2007-05-20 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Gian Domeni Calgeer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:41 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [solved] Re: [gentoo-user] Xinerama on 945GM: "Set > VBE mode failed" > Thanks for the suggestion, but if I remove them it say

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo and KISS ?

2007-05-20 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Walter Dnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 3:33 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo and KISS ? > > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 10:42:22AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > > > If a person does not

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo and KISS ?

2007-05-18 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 4:26 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo and KISS ? > Once you get used to it, you'll probably like Gentoo: most > people do. Those who leave usually

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs]

2007-05-18 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 7:02 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular > dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs] > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGN

RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs]

2007-05-17 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Hemmann, Volker Armin > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 2:22 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo gets as bad SuSE: Circular > dependencies [WAS: Thank you Gentoo devs] > > > On Donnerstag, 17. M

RE: [gentoo-user] My only input on the subject of circular dependencies

2007-05-17 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Dan Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:52 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] My only input on the subject of > circular dependencies > > > On Thu, 17 May 2007 09:18:40 +0900 > <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [gentoo-user] Can't start apache [solved]

2007-05-17 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 8:21 PM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can't start apache [solved] > > > On Thursday 17 May 2007, Johannes Skov Frandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

[gentoo-user] My only input on the subject of circular dependencies

2007-05-16 Thread burlingk
My only input at this time (since I am a total newb when it comes to Gentoo), is this. I had an issue with circular dependencies, but it was because I did not understand the intricacies of use flags at the time. Now that I understand better, the only problem I seem to run into is trying to get

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
Strictly http and https, and only through Internet Explorer. I'll give the gmane.org site a try when the network comes online. ^_^ If I can get enough of a connection to bring the pages up, then it may be acceptable for reading purposes. If that is the case, then I can use email to post. I will

RE: [gentoo-user] Managing my kernel

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: Aleksandar L. Dimitrov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 11:16 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Managing my kernel > > > On Mon, 14 May 2007 22:16:04 +0100 > Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
I think that once my internet access becomes functional (even then it will just be .edu, .org, .gov, and .mil sites), I will see how well the gmane page loads for me. :) I will use it to read the messages, and email to post. > -Original Message- > From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
Thank you for all the input. I will give the gmane page a try when I am able. Although that is not an optimal option, it may still be better than just unsubscribing. Thank you very much to all those who answered my questions. :) -- Ken -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
> -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Q< > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:49 AM > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: A List Question > > > James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [about gmane.org] > > If you are just reading,

[gentoo-user] A List Question

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
Is there a way to select a list option so that I can get a plain text digest? The regular list traffic produces way too many messages, but I cannot read the digest version on my mail system because it sends it as a bunch of .eml attachments, and the mail system strips them out (It is at the server

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
If you have an active internet environment, use the knopix disk to download an iso for one of the live CD's, such as the actual liveCD or the minimal CD, and then burn to disk, and get the stage3 tarball. Or, if you are on a different machine now, use the machine you are on now to get the ISO if y

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: lots of broken/missing dependencies when starting w/ stage1

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
If the tests are failing, then perhaps they are needed even more. Also, if you are building from a stage1, you are not dealing with non-dev builds at all. ^^;; -Original Message- From: Enrico Weigelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 9:27 PM To: gentoo-user Subject: [

RE: [gentoo-user] Getting Started

2007-05-14 Thread burlingk
Do you have any advice for making sure that the Xorg install is successful? Seems to always die during the compile process for the ati driver. ^^;; -Original Message- From: Vladimir Rusinov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 4:21 PM To

[gentoo-user] Getting Started

2007-05-13 Thread burlingk
I am new to Gentoo, and working on getting things up and going. I am running an HP Pavilion with an Athlon 64 processor. I'll build a desktop eventually when I have the time, but for now this is it. I am attempting to install the x86 version of Gentoo from the i686 stage3 tarball, and so far hav

[gentoo-user] Problems recieving digest

2007-05-11 Thread burlingk
What format is the digest usually sent in? I got an email that seems to be a bunch of attatchements that had been stripped from the message. Is there a way to set my settings so that I get a text only digest? Most lists I am on, that is the default, so I was surprised. Please respond to this one d