On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 11:03, Andy Gibbs via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm hitting a rather difficult problem. I have to compile with RTTI data
> structures generated because, even though I am not using dynamic_cast or
> typeid in my application code, I am linki
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 13:53, Taylor, Max via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
>
>
> I’m building a source-to-source tool with clang. What I want to do is
> instrument stores made with the binary = operator. Currently, I’m running
> into problems with rewriting expressio
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 04:02, Владимир Фролов via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Greetings! I'm using clang for source-to-source translation.
>
> Recently I got a problem with parsing code which use templates.
> First, here is the working example:
>
> struct MyTestVector2
> {
> uns
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 09:29, Marshall Clow via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2020, at 6:34 AM, Pavel Černohorský via cfe-users <
> cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to ask what is wrong with the following code:
> > ```
> >
> > #include
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 13:29, Manu agarwal via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the below code the compiler throws "undeclared identifier" when the
> commented line is uncommented. Whereas the line just before compiles fine.
>
> Regards,
> Manu
>
> typedef bool (* Dummy
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 11:30, Robert Ankeney wrote:
> Thanks Richard! This works great! One more question - assuming I have a
> templated class CClass, how would I match tVal for:
> void myFunc(CClass* tVal) ?
>
It depends exactly what you're looking for. If you don't care what CClass
is, and wa
The declarations of tVal and tParam can be matched by
varDecl(hasType(templateTypeParmType()))
The use of tVal can be matched by
declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(varDecl(hasType(templateTypeParmType()
https://godbolt.org/z/B3SuC3
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 15:47, Robert Ankeney via cfe-users <
cfe
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 19:06, Sterling B via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi Clang Experts, could you kindly advice how to get location of a
> function *name* when visiting FunctionDecl in RecursiveASTVisitor
> (getBeginLoc and getEndLoc return the whole range for the definition,
On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 00:09, Jeffrey Walton via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm testing Steven Munroe's pveclib library
> (https://github.com/munroesj52/pveclib). It is testing OK with GCC,
> but I am having trouble with Clang.
>
> I've been able to test up to C
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 07:39, Ray Lischner via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 5/15/20 6:53 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> > Can you try calling begin() on an istream_view& directly, and see
> > if you get the same error?
>
> $ cat istream_begin.cpp
> #include
> #include
> #include
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 03:50, Ray Lischner wrote:
> On 5/13/20 10:09 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 09:24, Ray Lischner via cfe-users
> > mailto:cfe-users@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> >
> > I am using clang++ 10 with GCC libstdc++ 10 prerelease. I tried
> > compiling the
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 09:24, Ray Lischner via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I am using clang++ 10 with GCC libstdc++ 10 prerelease. I tried
> compiling the example from section 24.6.4.1 [range.istream.overview]. It
> works with g++ 10 but with clang++ 10 -std=c++20, I get
> constr
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 05:41, Dr S3curity via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Imagine the very basic code below, it has some missing elements, we dont
> have the foo() function and MyClass class,
>
> ```test.cpp
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> MyClass* mc = new
In the latest draft, this is [temp.pre]/10:
"""
A definition of a function template, member function of a class template,
variable template, or static data member of a class template shall be
reachable from the end of every definition domain (6.3) in which it is
implicitly instantiated (13.9.1) un
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 10:14, krokus via cfe-users
wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Thanks for the quick response; it gave me some directions to
> investigate further, otherwise it seemed I got stuck trying to make
> sense of many moving pieces in this puzzle. So, my understanding is
> that generally the run
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 15:31, krokus via cfe-users
wrote:
> First of all a preface - This problem was spotted while trying to
> build a large C++ project which links a close to 100 of object file
> together, plus libraries. I can't replicate this behavior in a simple
> isolated test. Just want to
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 14:19, Alexis Murzeau via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When using clang, I discovered that it errors out where other compilers
> doesn't (GCC and MSVC).
>
> I'm trying to do this:
> - Have a library compiled with -fvisibility=hidden and adding
> __
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 05:28, Romain GEISSLER
wrote:
> > Le 15 mars 2020 à 20:14, Richard Smith a écrit :
> >
> > No, we still don't have a resolution from the C++ committee, but it's
> being discussed by various implementers, and we hope to present to the
> committee a suggested set of changes
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 15:14, Romain GEISSLER via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like the working of C++20 introduced some breaking
> compatibilities with some C++17 accepted patterns. From what I read in
> https://reviews.llvm.org/rL375306 these incompatibilities
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 09:33, Weston Carvalho
wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Thanks for your response!
>
> I'm currently getting all the CXXRecordDecls using the ASTMatchFinfer.
> AFAICT, I can't access Sema since the MatchFinder is an ASTConsumer instead
> of a SemaConsumer. I guess I can make my own Mat
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 12:13, Weston Carvalho via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> HI,
>
> I'm trying to write a tool that uses the AST to look at all the class
> declarations in our codebase and get some metrics on our use of special
> member functions. (How many classes are copyable
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 07:24, Christopher H Green via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've spent the last several days trying to build a fast, full-featured
> relocatable distribution of LLVM/Clang 9.0.1 on Linux RHEL7, which has an
> older native GCC (4.8.5)—I can't require
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 19:51, FRANČEK PRIJATELJ via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> /*
>
> Following code compiled with clang-cl on win10 generates 2 errors
> (while the same code compiled with MS cl compiles):
>
> t1.cpp(12,35): error: in-class initializer for static data member is
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019, 22:45 henry ding via cfe-users, <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> simple test.cpp:
> void test(std::string xx,string bb,int aa){}
>
> clang usage:
> int getFuncInfo(Rewriter* TheRewrite,clang::ASTContext *Context, const
> FunctionDecl *func,FuncNode &node){
> clang::Lan
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 at 01:45, Guofeng Zhang via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just stat using clang 8 not long ago. I need to compile our old c++
> source without changing it. It is compiled with Visual Studio before. Now I
> want to migrate to clang as the compiler.
>
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 10:42, Michael Price - Dev via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Should this be ill-formed?
>
> struct C {
> constexpr C() {}
> constexpr bool f() const { return true; }
> };
> constexpr C c{};
>
> constexpr bool fails_9_0_0(const C* pc, bool (C::*pm)() const
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 20:19, Alex Biddulph via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason why clang-tblgen is not installed with all of the
> other clang binaries?
>
> According to
> http://releases.llvm.org/8.0.0/docs/HowToCrossCompileLLVM.html
> clang-tblgen (along
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 19:48, Matthew Fernandez
wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2019, at 14:58, Richard Smith via cfe-users <
> cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 10:32, Chris Hall via cfe-users <
> cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> On 09/08
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 10:32, Chris Hall via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 09/08/2019 15:00, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> >> On Aug 9, 2019, at 05:23, Chris Hall via cfe-users wrote:
> >>
> >> I find that __builtin_constant_p() works as expected, but
> >> __has_builtin(constant_p)
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 15:05, Romulo via cfe-users
wrote:
> Hello there, thanks for your time reading this :)
>
> I am trying to extract the code for a specialized template function, but I
> have no idea on how to proceed. I know I can use SourceManager to get the
> original 'pure template' code b
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 23:20, Victor “LOST” Milovanov via cfe-users <
cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi CFE users!
>
>
>
> I am trying to get a `QualType` instance from
> `UnresolvedUsingTypenameDecl`. Unlike `TypeAliasDecl`
> `UnresolvedUsingTypenameDecl` does not have a `getUnderlyingType` m
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 22:47, Sudhindra kulkarni
wrote:
>
> Thanks Richard for the answer.
>
> I have another question regarding the include(-I) option.
>
> If we have a c file called cfile.c and a header file called header.h both in
> the same directory say (dir x). cfile.c includes header.h as
On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 23:09, Sudhindra kulkarni via cfe-users
wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Tim Northover"
> Date: May 1, 2019 3:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Overriding macro values defined in source code
> To: "Sudhindra kulkarni"
> Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailin
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 12:06, Paul Smith via cfe-users
wrote:
>
> How can I get clang to stop caring about gch directories for
> precompiled headers that were created by GCC?
>
> Currently my main build uses GCC and it generates .gch directories:
>
> $ ls -1d foo_pch*
> foo_pch.h
> foo_pch.h
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:44, Jan Korous wrote:
>
> > On Nov 7, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Werner LEMBERG via cfe-users <
> cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> The rule for determining when a base class function declaration
> >> introduced by a using-declaration is hidden by a derived class
> >>
The rule for determining when a base class function declaration introduced
by a using-declaartion is hidden by a derived class function declaration
does not take the template parameter list into account:
http://eel.is/c++draft/namespace.udecl#15.sentence-1
So clang's behaviour is conforming and gc
On 15 May 2018 at 16:01, John McCall via cfe-dev
wrote:
> On May 15, 2018, at 6:05 PM, George Karpenkov via cfe-dev <
> cfe-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> +cfe-dev
>
> Hi Andrea,
>
> I think you might get more luck asking on the cfe-dev mailing list.
>
>
> George
>
> On May 15, 2018, at 1:15 PM,
37 matches
Mail list logo
