Gnucash has 44 votes on AUR. It's useful (and very old, stable)
accounting/bookkeeping software. Would any TUs be willing to migrate it
from AUR to [community]?
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnucash/
Feel free to take over.
> On Nov 5, 2016, at 02:36, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
>
> ohmyarch [1] filed a orphan request for spdlog-git [2]:
>
> 1. Very bad PKGBUILD
> 2. No more updates
> 3. I can take over it
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ohmyarch/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.o
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> refind-efi has been flagged out of date for 9 months.
>> Are there any packagers who would be wil
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> refind-efi has been flagged out of date for 9 months.
> Are there any packagers who would be willing to take this one over?
>
> It is not the most out of date even ... but it's an important
> co
There also seems to be a (possibly newer?) PKGBUILD for 5.0 alpha 22 from
just before it was removed:
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/dasher/trunk/PKGBUILD?id=fdf7b7ada66f8b579a82ebc1c467d1aa2e5779fa
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Sean Greenslade
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Doug Newgard
wrote:
>
> > >
> > > As far as I can tell, you've been maintaining nothing. You put things
> up on
> > > github then tell people to submit pull requests if they want even an
> > > update.
> > > That's not maintaining a package, that's you simply wantin
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Doug Newgard
wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2016 12:17:40 -0400
> Ido Rosen wrote:
>
> > I was maintaining it - it was following Debian stable (8/jessie
> currently),
> > not unstable (sid), as I explained in the previous email to aur-request
I was maintaining it - it was following Debian stable (8/jessie currently),
not unstable (sid), as I explained in the previous email to aur-requests.
bertptrs is free to create his own package, and call it dpkg-unstable for
example, if he wants the unstable version.
Are you going to follow your o
By disowning this, maintainership went to the comaintainer lotia, another
reason why taking ownership of a package without discussion or a waiting
period can further screw up the package. Please re-add me as the
maintainer of this package, and revert the changes made by bertptrs.
Thanks,
Ido
On
Hi,
I was the maintainer of dpkg up until a few hours ago when an orphan
request was submitted and accepted within an hour of submission. There is
supposed to be a 2 week period where the maintainer is contacted and a
conversation can happen. This procedure was not followed here.
The package
mksrcinfo will include anything the PKGBUILD writes to stdout in the body
of the PKGBUILD (i.e. not in any prepare/build/package/etc. functions when
being sourced, for example:
pkgname=example
pkgver=1
echo "Hello world."
prepare() {}
build() {}
package() {}
... which will generate an .SRCINFO f
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Johannes Löthberg
wrote:
> On 12/07, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 at 18:07:37, Ido Rosen wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it possible currently to set the keywords/tags in the PKGBUILD
>>> itself instead of o
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Lukas Fleischer
wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 at 18:25:47, Andrejs Mivreņiks wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Suspending the account is good, though what about messages? Are they
>> going to be removed? Also there is totally no spam protection that I know of
>> at
>> this momen
Is it possible currently to set the keywords/tags in the PKGBUILD
itself instead of on the website? (Previously, we had to set
categories on the AUR website, but that felt suboptimal.) e.g. a
keywords=('cats' 'dogs' ...); variable?
Or, alternatively, would people be amenable to adding an ssh com
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Justin,
>>
>> I wasn't aware of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aur-git/ and I
>> agree, it should be available for AUR 4 too.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ralf
>>
>
> Rather than
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Rudy Matela wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am importing a PKGBUILD for something that has only a binary release.
> More specifically, a binary release for i686 and another for x86_64.
>
> In the old AUR, I was packaging it using an if clause to choose which
> release to dow
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:44 PM, David Kaylor wrote:
>
>> I have so few packages to maintain, the burden to me is very low. And I'm
>> just taking it as oppurtunity to finally learn to use Git. But a tool for
>> submitting a tarball and havi
I'm guessing, but AUR4 probably does not allow rewriting history
(non-fast-forward merges), or forced pushes.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:02 PM, SpinFlo wrote:
> 2015-06-10 19:26 GMT+02:00 Marcel Korpel :
>> * Marcel Korpel (Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:25:30
>> +0200):
>>> $ git rebase -i HEAD~2
>>>
>>> T
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Harley W wrote:
> Hello,I'm having a lot of trouble transferring my package to AUR4. It is a
> git package, so after trying for about an hour to get it to work the way that
> is described on the wiki page, I thought I could try to push it to a separate
> remote r
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Chris Warrick wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> I think some of the orphans on AUR are just maintained by multiple
>> people. The usage pattern is:
>>
>> Person A adopts, updates, and disowns.
>> Pers
015 at 11:59 AM, Bruno Pagani wrote:
> You mean that:
> https://aur4.archlinux.org/pkgbase/${pkgname}/comaintainers/ ?
>
> Le 09/06/2015 17:53, Ido Rosen a écrit :
>> I think some of the orphans on AUR are just maintained by multiple
>> people. The usage pattern is:
>
I think some of the orphans on AUR are just maintained by multiple
people. The usage pattern is:
Person A adopts, updates, and disowns.
Person B some time later notices it's out of date, adopts, updates, disowns.
It seems perfectly reasonable to have multiple people maintain a
package over time
Updating this now. Sorry, I let this one slip by.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 4:04 AM, wrote:
> danyf90 [1] filed a orphan request for dpkg [2]:
>
> Outdated for more than one month
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/danyf90/
> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/dpkg/
>
Hi,
Just a reminder that I wrote this script when this first came up to
help maintainers who already maintain *multiple* packages in one git
repo to split them into separate git repos, upload them individually
to AUR4, etc.
https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux/blob/master/bin/import-to-aur4
also
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/linux
or zcat /proc/config.gz on a running system
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> Some options:
>
> yaourt -G linux
>
>
> https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/package
Some options:
yaourt -G linux
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/linux
git clone packages.git with --depth 1 (shallow clone)
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Javier Domingo Cansino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking to package rtai, which was already packag
Are you dropping support for it because it has been forked & replaced
upstream, or because of time constraints on your end? Or have you migrated
away from nvidia graphics?
If the former, could you recommend an [extra] or [community] / officially
supported mplayer-based or mplayer-like package oth
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Jonathan Steel wrote:
> On Fri 02 Jan 2015 at 00:24, Ido Rosen wrote:
> > Happy new year,
> >
> > Would anyone like to bring the venerable UNIX spreadsheet program "sc"
> into
> > [community]? I'm maintaining it in A
Since this is a git question, it probably belongs on that project's mailing
list.
Anyhow, what I do is use git smudge/clean filters to ignore the line.
Here's an example from a different application of smudge/clean filters of
how to ignore specific lines in a file:
http://stackoverflow.com/questi
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Levente Polyak wrote:
> On 01/27/2015 05:42 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> Hi Allan & others,
>> This is a pretty big remote vulnerability, with a big attack
>> surface. I'm not sure if this is the right list to be sending it to,
>
Hi Allan & others,
This is a pretty big remote vulnerability, with a big attack
surface. I'm not sure if this is the right list to be sending it to,
but I'd suggest patching glibc right away. I think RedHat's already
released an RHEL5 backported patch, and upstream has already patched
it (as of
Thanks,
I've adopted the package and will update it tomorrow/Wednesday.
I'll try to coordinate with the maintainer of poco-dev to see if we
can just merge the two.
Ido
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:28 PM, wrote:
> Request #1966 has been accepted by jleclanche [1].
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> On 2014-12-29 23:41, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > TL;DR:
>> > https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux/blob/master/bin/i
Just wondering, how do Arch devs feel about implementing these
recommendations by default in Arch's openssh package? Or would this be
something worthy of an AUR package?
https://stribika.github.io/2015/01/04/secure-secure-shell.html
Especially interested in the moduli, KexAlgorithms, and Cipher
Oops, don't know if the attachment went through. Pasted below for convenience:
# $Id$
pkgname=rsync
pkgver=3.1.1
pkgrel=3
pkgdesc="A file transfer program to keep remote files in sync"
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://rsync.samba.org/";
license=('GPL3')
depends=('perl' 'popt' 'acl' 'zlib')
bac
Hi,
I'd like to add --time-limit / --stop-at added to ArchLinux's rsync
since it's available in some other distributions. (This patch is
distributed from the same source as rsync itself, just in a different
tarball called rsync-patches, along with a bunch of other patches for
optional functional
Happy new year,
Would anyone like to bring the venerable UNIX spreadsheet program "sc" into
[community]? I'm maintaining it in AUR currently. Many other distros
support it. :-)
Ido
Also, I just requested a lost password and the email didn't arrive.
Is it possible the mail queue is stopped or backed up on the bugs
server?
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 12/29/14, Minh Nhut Duong wrote:
>> I try to create my account again but this user already take
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> [reposted to the correct list, oops]
>
> Hi list
>
> My name is Jerome Leclanche and this is my application for becoming an
> Arch Linux TU. Both Balló György and Sven-Hendrik Haase have
> encouraged me to apply, and Sven-Hendrik has
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> TL;DR:
> https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux/blob/master/bin/import-to-aur4.sh
>
This is how I invoke it:
bin/import-to-aur4.sh https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux aur
(replace ido/packages-archlin
t.git/
! [remote rejected] aur4/ceph-git -> master (hook declined)
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:21:17PM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 09:4
tr() > int()
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master
To ssh+git://a...@aur-dev.archlinux.org:/ceph-git.git/
! [remote rejected] aur4/ceph-git -> master (hook declined)
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> If you follow the pattern I do, of having a dir
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:21:17PM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 09:49:24PM -0500, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> > Is there currently a script to just create a .SRCINFO from a PKGBUILD?
>> > I don&#
Is there currently a script to just create a .SRCINFO from a PKGBUILD?
I don't want any side effects like downloading src packages (i.e. I
don't want to run makepkg or mkaurball), etc. since this is for use in
git filter-branch --tree-filter.
ttle
more on aur-dev) later tonight.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Phillip Smith wrote:
> On 30 December 2014 at 11:54, Ido Rosen wrote:
>>
>> git help subtree.
>
> My git-fu is weak beyond add/commit/push/pull. Looks a little complex:
> http://makingsoftware.wordpress.com/
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> git help subtree.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Phillip Smith wrote:
>>> For those of us already storing our packages in git[0], has anyone got some
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> git help subtree.
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Phillip Smith wrote:
>> For those of us already storing our packages in git[0], has anyone got some
>> documentation/pointers for how to handle migrating from having 1
git help subtree.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Phillip Smith wrote:
> For those of us already storing our packages in git[0], has anyone got some
> documentation/pointers for how to handle migrating from having 1 big git
> repository to dozens of individual git repositories?
>
> Do we just bl
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>>
>> Not sure what the best way to accomplish this would be?
>>
>
>
> Sounds like the case for pacman hooks. Those were still in the works
> though, last ti
Will all existing AUR packages automatically get their own git
repositories or will we have to resubmit all packages?
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Lukas Fleischer
wrote:
> The 4.0.0 release brings Git repositories to AUR packages. You can test
> a pre-alpha version at aur-dev.archlinux.org [1
Hi,
Currently, mkinitcpio runs before the correct version of
linux-headers is installed, since linux gets upgraded before
linux-headers gets upgraded.
The reason this is a problem for me is that it interferes with dkms,
nvidia, vboxguest, and other mkinitcpio install/hook scripts that need
the l
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Hunter Jozwiak
> wrote:
>> Hi guys.
>> I got an ergonomic keyboard in exchange for a wireless keyboard that did not
>> work. There are cool buttons on this keyboard that give you th
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Hunter Jozwiak wrote:
> Hi guys.
> I got an ergonomic keyboard in exchange for a wireless keyboard that did not
> work. There are cool buttons on this keyboard that give you the ability to
> reply to emails, forward emails, control media, etc. How do I get these
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:46 PM, "P. A. López-Valencia"
wrote:
>
> On 17/12/14 13:04, Ido Rosen wrote:
>>
>> Did you read the rest of that paragraph? You disregarded my points as a
>> red herring, then made a straw man argument that we should donate instead of
&g
Also, since it was mentioned regarding 2.1.x: ECC support is nice to
have, but is a new feature that's not required for Arch db/package
verification. That's why I suggested that we downgrade gnupg to 2.0.x
and, for those users who are willing to take the risk with gnupg 2.1.x
before it is marked s
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Levente Polyak wrote:
> besides the "upstream stable release" discussion (which i will leave out
> here) i have two small questions:
>
> On 12/17/2014 03:03 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> On the gnupg-devel mailing list I've seen a fe
>> The usual practice is to wait until there is a first point release that
>> catches the most glaring bugs, see for example how the kernel and the main
>> desktop environments are updated. The first point release was yesterday
>> (2014-12-16) and it is already in testing. This transition would hav
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:41 PM, "P. A. López-Valencia"
wrote:
>
> On 17/12/14 11:28, Ido Rosen wrote:
>>
>> We seem to be in agreement: 2.1.x is not yet in the set of upstream
>> *stable* releases, but 2.0.x is in that set.
>
>
> Not really. You misse
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:53 AM, WorMzy Tykashi
wrote:
> On 17 December 2014 at 16:39, Armin K. wrote:
>> FYI, in case someone who maintains it looks at the mailing list, I must
>> inform you that community svntogit web interface is stuck at the same
>> commit for more than 24 hours now.
>>
>> h
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:00 AM, "P. A. López-Valencia"
wrote:
>
> On 17/12/14 09:32, Ido Rosen wrote:
>>
>>
>> Agreed that everything in "core" should be maximally stable. (Also,
>> following upstream stable releases rather than unstable re
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:04 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 02:30:43AM +0100, Neven Sajko wrote:
>> On 16 December 2014 at 20:52, David J. Haines wrote:
>> > gdisk is also capable of placing new partitions at the end of a block of
>> > empty space without having to do manua
Ralf,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:03:31 -0500, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> Given that it's not marked as stable upstream, and that it's such a
>> critical core component of Arch's infrastructure, I find it
>> quest
>From gnupg.org:
"2.0.26 is the stable version suggested for most users,
2.1.1 is the brand-new modern version with support for ECC and many
other new features,
and 1.4.18 is the classic portable version."
The 2.1 series of gnupg is not stable, it still has many major bugs,
not the least of which
Sorry for top posting accidentally.
This seems like a hack, why not just use a real issue tracker? For
example, I use GitHub Issues to track issues related to my AUR
packages, and then the AUR comments become something more like a News
page for that package.
I thought there was a plan for AUR to move to something more
VCS-oriented
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:27:09 -0500
> Ido Rosen wrote:
>
>> The the default configuration under ArchLinux and DEVICE partitions in
>> mdadm.conf, mdadm and the mdadm mkinitcpio hook fail to load the
>> raid10 kerne
The the default configuration under ArchLinux and DEVICE partitions in
mdadm.conf, mdadm and the mdadm mkinitcpio hook fail to load the
raid10 kernel module automatically, and as a result raid10 arrays fail
to load on boot in Arch.
My temporary workaround is to include the raid10 kernel module in
> Does that make sense?
It sounds like Gentoo Prefix. Arch Prefix would be nice to have.
Hi,
Would anyone be willing to bring bmon into [community]? It's a
particularly nice ncurses bandwidth monitor, currently maintained by
dragonl...@aur.archlinux.org (main package) and me (git package). It
has 79 votes. I've seen packages with fewer votes go into [community]
but would understan
Daniel, I think you orphaned that package for me originally over a
year ago. I don't know who took it from me though. The issue isn't
that I want it back, I just don't think this is an isolated incident -
there's at least one TU disowning packages manually without following
procedures.
On Tue, S
n 2014-09-30 19:34, Daniel Micay wrote:
>>
>> On 30/09/14 08:07 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I wasn't contacted and apparently linux-lts-tresor has been
>>> disowned/taken over without my consent or any notice. Please explain...
>>&g
8:34 PM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 30/09/14 08:07 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I wasn't contacted and apparently linux-lts-tresor has been
>> disowned/taken over without my consent or any notice. Please explain...
>>
>> Ido
>
> I don't remember
Hi,
I wasn't contacted and apparently linux-lts-tresor has been
disowned/taken over without my consent or any notice. Please explain...
Ido
Yes, that is my point. It did up until recently, it was integrated
into chromium recently.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Timothy Redaelli
wrote:
> Il 31/08/2014 03:23, Ido Rosen ha scritto:
>
>> Hi,
>>Would it be possible to add a replaces= and/or conflicts= to th
Hi,
Would it be possible to add a replaces= and/or conflicts= to the
chromium Arch package for "chromium-libpdf", since it integrates that
(formerly very popular) AUR package and causes a file conflict on
attempted upgrade otherwise?(Given the popularity of both
packages, seems like a good id
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Johannes Löthberg
wrote:
> On 17/08, Ido Rosen wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Lukas Fleischer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> * Dynamically connect each AUR package to a repository, so that it is
>>> easy to s
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Lukas Fleischer
wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 at 17:50:54, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> [...]
>> Seeing the discussion about using info/alternates to store git objects
>> for all repos in one place, it sounds a lot like they're reinventing
>&g
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On 2014-08-17 15:26, SpinFlo wrote:
>>
>> 2014-08-17 17:25 GMT+02:00 :
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>
>>> i heard that something like a bug tracker/GIT for the packages in AUR
>>> is planned, and i've become curious how the state of it is
>>
>
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 17:39, Ido Rosen wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Sébastien Luttringer
>> wrote:
>>> On 23/07/2014 23:35, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>>>> On 23/07/2014 15:59, Ido Rosen
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On 23/07/2014 23:35, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On 23/07/2014 15:59, Ido Rosen wrote:
>>> There's a PKGBUILD for ladvd and lldpd in AUR currently, these are
>>> important networking tools in data c
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Hi Ido,
>
>
> 2014-08-02 17:41 GMT+02:00 Ido Rosen :
>> The noip client is GPL licensed F/OSS software (it's right there in
>> the COPYING file in the tarball). Just because it connects to a
>>
Do not do this.
The noip client is GPL licensed F/OSS software (it's right there in
the COPYING file in the tarball). Just because it connects to a
commercial service does not mean it deserves to be removed from the
official package repository. Take, for example, various GMail
clients, Chromium
Hi all,
I'd like to amend my previous request for lldpd and/or ladvd to be
moved to [community] or [extra], and add these packages:
nagios
nagios-nrpe
nagios-nrpe-plugin (?)
nagios-nsca
Again, there are not many people using Arch in data center
environments, so the vote counts on these packages
There's a PKGBUILD for ladvd and lldpd in AUR currently, these are
important networking tools in data center environments. Can someone
please promote at least one of them to [community] or ideally [extra]?
They're not high on votes, but I think this should be an exception
since not many people ar
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:09 PM, David Phillips
wrote:
> >but it's a problem if it has indeed not been updated since 2002
>
> Simple question: why?
>
I second David's point! Not all software needs updating. This is a
simple, straightforward tool built on top of libraries that haven't changed
This is intentionally bogus. It is commercial software. You are expected to
download it yourself if you have a license to it.
> On Jul 21, 2014, at 13:38, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
>
> bidulock [1] filed a deletion request for sfptpd [2]:
>
> Bogus source URL.
>
> [1] https://aur.archl
ote:
> On 2014-07-20 16:31, Ido Rosen wrote:
>
>> Would it be possible to request that "sc" be promoted to [community] by
>> one
>> of you fine TUs? It doesn't change very often at all and it's a pretty
>> handy tool. Additionally, while we
Would it be possible to request that "sc" be promoted to [community] by one
of you fine TUs? It doesn't change very often at all and it's a pretty
handy tool. Additionally, while we're at it, an unrelated but very cool
package, "python2-mrjob"? :-)
I am not a TU, otherwise I would do it myself.
robably mean to
>also move a dozen ruby dependencies or use bundler.
>
>I will probably move ceph, which you are also maintaining, though.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Jonathan Steel wrote:
>
> > On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 12:51, Ido Rosen wrote:
> > > Hi,
Also, the source repo for vagrant itself is
https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant ... but I think the RPMs and other
packaging is generated by https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant-installers
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> The official distribution is the RPM/DEB/bin
here: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant-installers
Ido
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Anatol Pomozov
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful
>
Hi,
I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful tool
for ArchLinux users. I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR;
however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you TUs
could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get
wi
Oh, also:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> If saving yourself the step of having to "git clone" again is your
> only goal, here are two possible ways to solve that problem:
>
> 1) Use the $GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES environment variable or
> .gi
Sorry for top-posting in the previous message. See below.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>
> The local changes are discarded when updating. This matches the behaviour
> when non-VCS sources are used. It also allows incremental builds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukáš Jirkovský
>
I think I found a bug: If the repository URL/source array entry has changed
but the directory name has not, the user would have to manually delete the
cloned repository, otherwise the git fetch/checkout would be from the
incorrect upstream repo.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrot
I maintain all of these deletion requested packages:
Please delete lxc-docker [1], since docker is now in [community].
If it is possible to repoint lxc-docker-git to docker-git, please do
that as well. Otherwise, please delete lxc-docker-git [2] or merge it
into docker-git, which supersedes it.
Patch submitted. I hope it gets accepted... :-/
https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1573
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
>>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Jerome Leclanche >wrote:
> >
> >> What's the outcome on this? I'm interested in large keys in default
>
pg.git;a=blob;f=g10/keygen.c;h=4bb8bbaed4b27a977b3c2b543dafd335acb538df;hb=refs/heads/master#l6
Ido
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Ido Rosen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've added gnupg-largekeys, which is the gnupg from Core, but patched
> to
> > extend the
I really don't care either way, but (a) lxc-docker is more descriptive of
what docker actually is than docker-io; and (b) the Docker
website/installation documentation for ArchLinux already points to
lxc-docker and lxc-docker-git... It's not worth changing names unless it's
for plain old "docker".
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
