Re: [lldb-dev] Deadlock loading DWARF symbols

2020-10-14 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
[I thought I had already sent this out weeks ago…] > On Oct 2, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Greg Clayton via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Yes this is bad, and GetDescription() is used as a convenience to print out > the module path (which might be a .o file within a .a file) and optionally > architecture of t

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Fast Conditional Breakpoints (FCB)

2019-08-19 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Aug 16, 2019, at 11:13 AM, Ismail Bennani via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > > Thanks for all your feedbacks. > > I’ve been following the discussion closely and find your approach quite > interesting. > > As Jim explained, I’m also trying to have a conditional breakpoint, that is

Re: [lldb-dev] STABS

2019-07-26 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Jul 26, 2019, at 4:42 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I recently found myself looking at ObjectFileMachO.cpp. I noticed that nearly > half of that file (2700 LOC) is taken up by the ParseSymtab function, and > that maybe one third of that is taken up by w

Re: [lldb-dev] Cannot use system debugserver for testing

2019-07-22 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Jul 22, 2019, at 10:14 AM, Gábor Márton wrote: > > error 18:33:20.280017 +0200 authd Fatal: interaction not allowed (session > has no ui access) (engine 3727) > This gave me a hint, so I used VPN to have a gui and got a gui window popped > up to authenticate lldb. And then I could ru

Re: [lldb-dev] Cannot use system debugserver for testing

2019-07-22 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
I think the system logs (in Console.app) would tell us more. Search for debugserver and you should find attach failures. Then remove the filter and look at what happens right before that. There should be a log from taskgated or authd that is a little more explicit about what’s failing. Fred >

Re: [lldb-dev] Flaky test on GreenDragon?

2019-03-07 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 7:43 AM, Davide Italiano wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:04 AM Gábor Márton via lldb-dev > mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I've seen that recently the test >> lldb-Suite.macosx/queues.TestQueues.py fails non-deterministically. >> >> E.g.

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

2019-02-27 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Feb 27, 2019, at 3:14 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:52 PM Frédéric Riss > wrote: >> On Feb 27, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Zachary Turner > > wrote: > > >> For what it's worth, in an earlier message I mentioned th

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

2019-02-27 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Feb 27, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:39 PM Frédéric Riss > wrote: > >> On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:52 PM, Zachary Turner > > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:49 PM Frédéric Riss >

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

2019-02-26 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:52 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:49 PM Frédéric Riss > wrote: > >> On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Zachary Turner > > wrote: >> >> I would probably build the server by using mostly code fr

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

2019-02-26 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Feb 26, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Zachary Turner wrote: > > I would probably build the server by using mostly code from LLVM. Since it > would contain all of the low level debug info parsing libraries, i would > expect that all knowledge of debug info (at least, in the form that compilers > em

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Moving debug info parsing out of process

2019-02-26 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We've got some internal efforts in progress, and one of those would benefit > from debug info parsing being out of process (independently of whether or not > the rest of LLDB is out of process). > > There'

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

2019-01-08 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Jan 8, 2019, at 1:25 AM, Pavel Labath wrote: > > On 07/01/2019 22:45, Frédéric Riss wrote: >>> On Jan 7, 2019, at 11:31 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev >>> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/01/2019 19:26, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:40 AM Pave

Re: [lldb-dev] [Reproducers] SBReproducer RFC

2019-01-07 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 11:31 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev > wrote: > > On 07/01/2019 19:26, Jonas Devlieghere wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:40 AM Pavel Labath > >> >> wrote: >>I've been thinking about how could t

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [lit] check-all hanging

2019-01-04 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 7:30 AM, Joel E. Denny wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:30 AM Frédéric Riss wrote: > -llvm-dev + lldb-dev for the lldv test failures. > >> On Jan 3, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Joel E. Denny wrote: >> >> All, >> >> Thanks for the replies. Kuba: For LLDB, when were things ex

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [lit] check-all hanging

2019-01-03 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
-llvm-dev + lldb-dev for the lldv test failures. > On Jan 3, 2019, at 7:33 AM, Joel E. Denny wrote: > > All, > > Thanks for the replies. Kuba: For LLDB, when were things expected to have > improved? It's possible things improved for me at some point, but this isn't > something I've found ti

Re: [lldb-dev] Checkpoint/Restart with LLDB ?

2018-12-11 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Dec 10, 2018, at 10:13 AM, Gábor Márton via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there an LLDB counterpart to GDB's Checkpoint/Restart feature > (https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Checkpoint_002fRestart.html > )

Re: [lldb-dev] Extract compile unit infos from OSO entries for LTO objects

2018-09-11 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Sep 11, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Greg Clayton wrote: > >> >> On Sep 11, 2018, at 2:55 AM, Stefan Gränitz > > wrote: >> >> Hello everyone >> >> I am investigating a bug that prevents correct breakpoint resolution in LTO >> objects with embedded DWARF (no separate dS

Re: [lldb-dev] Using FileCheck in lldb inline tests

2018-08-23 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
FWIW, I’m supportive of this. I do find SB API based tests to be powerful but extremely cumbersome to write. If Vedant wants to write 15 different tests for the various cases he’s covering, it’s easy to see that they would be much easier to write this way. It is very powerful to have the test s

Re: [lldb-dev] clang::VersionTuple

2018-05-08 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On May 8, 2018, at 11:37 AM, Greg Clayton wrote: > > I was referring to the Swift and Apple internal branches. They tend to lock > down against older llvm and clang repositories so when we put changes in llvm > or clang that are required for LLDB, it makes merging a bit tougher in those >

Re: [lldb-dev] clang::VersionTuple

2018-05-08 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On May 8, 2018, at 10:04 AM, Greg Clayton via lldb-dev > wrote: > > > >> On May 8, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Zachary Turner > > wrote: >> >> We don’t want the lowest levels of lldb to depend on clang. If this is >> useful we should move it from clang to llvm and use ll

Re: [lldb-dev] GDB RSPs non-stop mode capability in v5.0

2018-03-29 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Mar 29, 2018, at 9:27 AM, Greg Clayton wrote: > > > >> On Mar 29, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Frédéric Riss > > wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Mar 29, 2018, at 7:32 AM, Greg Clayton via lldb-dev >>> mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mar 29, 2018, at

Re: [lldb-dev] GDB RSPs non-stop mode capability in v5.0

2018-03-29 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Mar 29, 2018, at 7:32 AM, Greg Clayton via lldb-dev > wrote: > > > >> On Mar 29, 2018, at 2:08 AM, Ramana via lldb-dev > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> It appears that the lldb-server, as of v5.0, did not implement the GDB RSPs >> non-stop mode >> (https://

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm

2018-01-19 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Jan 18, 2018, at 7:52 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev > wrote: > > Thank you for all the responses. Unfortunately I wasn't able to make > any progress on creating the patches today. I'll be sure to add > everyone who expressed interest here to the phabricator diff once I > have them ready.

Re: [lldb-dev] Resolving dynamic type based on RTTI fails in case of type names inequality in DWARF and mangled symbols

2017-12-20 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Dec 20, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev > wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Greg >> Clayton via lldb-dev >> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 12:41 PM >> To: Pavel Labath >> Cc: lldb-dev@list

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal

2016-06-30 Thread Frédéric Riss via lldb-dev
> On Jun 30, 2016, at 1:26 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev > wrote: > > On 30 June 2016 at 05:14, Tim Northover wrote: >>> That makes it fragile, and that’s why I disagree with your “90% done” >>> assessment. >>> What if the service behing the hook is down for a few days? >> >> In the long-term