Re: [sage-devel] Error during the complitation (make) on WSL

Le mardi 15 octobre 2024 à 17:18:08 UTC+2, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : Sure. However,here the problem is probably related to most WSL users sticking to the default for WSL Ubuntu LTS distro, which is likely to be 22.04, carrying giac 1.7, too old for Sage. So they'd need (i.e. Sage needs) to b

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: ci codecov/patch reports but not fail

Le dimanche 6 octobre 2024 à 01:07:06 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : It seems we have to choose between: (1) We keep the status quo: not testing every code path created in the PR results in the PR check failure. (2) we keep codecov/patch as it is, but require to add doctests for every code pat

[sage-devel] Re: Using Sage on Windows

Thank you very much Julian and Sebastian for these initiatives! On ask.sagemath, we see too many messages from Windows users not managing to install Sage. A recent example is https://ask.sagemath.org/question/79640/error-during-configuration-with-wsl/ We also see messages from users stuck to Sage

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.5.beta5 released

Le mardi 24 septembre 2024 à 23:36:23 UTC+2, William Stein a écrit : One thing is that when you do "make configure" it suggests a long list of packages to install, e.g., "apt-get update", then "apt-get install ". At least with Ubuntu 24.04 defaults several of these packages don't exist so that

[sage-support] Re: Error installing package scipy-1.12.0 in Develop

Hi, >From the log file: [spkg-install] g++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus This points towards a maximum memory reached. You may decrease the number of threads in the parallel build, e.g. using make -j4 instead of make -j8. Best regards, Eric. -- You received this me

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Demote jupyter-jsmol and tachyon to optional

Le mardi 20 août 2024 à 08:46:32 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : As far as I remember from the discussion in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/33513, saving 3d graphics to png files is already possible from the menu "Save as PNG". Indeed, this works well from the threejs menu, but this h

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Policy for standard packages from binary wheelsall

Le lundi 12 août 2024 à 02:45:03 UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : I think it would be be valuable to prepare a checklist for making such updates and add it to our developer documentation. I think Eric Gourgoulhon has some Jupyter notebooks that are a good test of graphics and typesetting

[sage-devel] Re: Bug in `factor` for multivariate polynomials over QQbar

FWIW, this bug is already there in Sage 9.8 (released in Feb 2023). Eric. Le samedi 3 août 2024 à 07:58:40 UTC+2, Peter Mueller a écrit : > The line `R. = QQbar[]; factor(a^2 - 2*c^2)` raises a > > ValueError: variable name '@c' is not alphanumeric > > while the same line with `c` replaced with

[sage-devel] Re: ssl problem

FWIW, I don't have this issue on my computer running the same version of Ubuntu as you (22.04.4). SageMath 10.4 has been built from source here, without the need for Sage to build openssl (the system openssl is 3.0.2): in config.log, there is ## -

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ask.sagemath.org issues - do we need it?

Le mercredi 3 juillet 2024 à 11:43:52 UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 4:35:57 PM UTC+2 Matthias Koeppe wrote: Karma and other gamification instruments are apparently available as a plugin. https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-gamification/225916 Karma is part of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ask.sagemath.org issues - do we need it?

Hi, I gave a look at the test Discourse site https://sagemath-test.discourse.group/ (thank you Matthias for setting it up!) as well as to the Jupyter Discourse site pointed out by Dima: https://discourse.jupyter.org/ DIscourse is clearly a high quality tool but I agree with Sébastien that it is

[sage-devel] Re: Invitation to Participate in Survey: Governance and Community building

Thank you very much for this initiative! Best wishes, Eric. Le mercredi 26 juin 2024 à 16:10:07 UTC+2, jplab a écrit : > Dear SageMath Community, > > As most of you are likely aware, our communication platforms surrounding > the development of Sagemath have unfortunately been the scene of > i

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: Removing Automatic PR Size Labels

I vote for (A1). Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://

Re: [sage-support] Error building sage, failed to build two packages

Le jeudi 18 avril 2024 à 00:36:07 UTC+2, Kevin a écrit : I increased my RAM allotment and decreased the number of threads used to 6, and that seems to have helped, but now I'm having an issue with two other packages, scipy and sagelib. In both cases, there is the error message gcc: fatal

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Use "CI Fix" label for merging into continuous integration runs

+1 Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: use "blocker" label only for PRs; use "critical" label for Issues

-1 from my side, for I think an issue can be a blocker. For instance: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36914 This issue, which regards the use of the notebook, could not have been detected by the CI framework. It is a serious regression and definitely a blocker IMHO: are we willing to re

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Hi Nils, Le vendredi 16 février 2024 à 04:37:28 UTC+1, Nils Bruin a écrit : On Thursday 15 February 2024 at 17:02:14 UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: but that's sphinx (Python), not jupyter. I see. The page I linked to is from Jupyter{book} which is, despite the similarity in name, not the jupyter

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le jeudi 15 février 2024 à 13:36:46 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : A possible solution does not involve changing Sage/Jupyter config. It's by capturing http requests to CDN and replacing them with the local resources. Thank you Dima! Could you indicate how to do this? (looks quite technical

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le jeudi 15 février 2024 à 11:20:40 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : With the previous version of Jupyterlab shipped with Sage 10.2, the system's MathJax was used. Can't we tweak the new Jupyterlab shipped with Sage 10.3 to use the system's MathJax as well? We don't do that. Perhaps tweaking is

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le jeudi 15 février 2024 à 04:54:42 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : I checked again on mac. Yes, jupyterlab (and notebook 7 as well) of Sage 10.3.beta8 fails in loading mathjax 2.7.7. (Before it worked because of the cache, I guess) OK, thanks for the feedback! Hence this is not a Ubuntu-specif

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 18:21:04 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : You may recall that we use jupyterlab_mathjax2 because of the discussion in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36129#issuecomment-1729218062 Thanks for reminding me about this. Then I guess the question is: why Jupyter

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 15:09:27 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : The partial conclusion is thus: - Sage 10.2 uses Ubuntu 22.04's MathJax (v2.7.9), so there is no issue when the computer is offline. - for some reason, Sage 10.3.beta* refuses to use Ubuntu 22.04's MathJa

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 15:39:05 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 10:55:41 PM UTC+9 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:51:01 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : What is puzzling is that MathJax 3.2.0 seems to have been successfully

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:51:01 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : More precisely, the Ubuntu 22.04's libjs-mathjax is version 2.7.9. When the computer is online and I right-click on "About MathJax" in a displayed cell, I get "MathJax v2.7.7", which is not the sy

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:51:01 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : What is puzzling is that MathJax 3.2.0 seems to have been successfully installed in the Sage tree during the install of Sage 10.3.beta*, cf. the attached log (SAGE_ROOT/logs/pkgs/mathjax-3.2.0.log), Well, maybe not

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:18:20 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:13:04 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : For off the grid working with MathJax, you need it locally installed. It might be that by default it doesn't happen, and MathJax is dynami

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:13:04 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : For off the grid working with MathJax, you need it locally installed. It might be that by default it doesn't happen, and MathJax is dynamically loaded from the net. The Ubuntu packages libjs-mathjax and fonts-mathjax are

[sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Hi, While working on a Sage 10.3.beta notebook in a train without any internet connection, I've noticed that there is no LaTeX rendering via MathJax, neither in the markdown cells nor in the output cells within the scope of %display latex. There is no such issue with Sage 10.2 and I've opened

[sage-devel] Re: Exception in sum((4*n+1)/factorial(n),n,1,oo)

I confirm the bug with Sage 10.3.beta7. It seems to be linked with the Maxima interface. Meanwhile, a workaround is to use the SymPy interface: sage: sum((4*n+1)/factorial(n), n, 1, oo, algorithm='sympy') 5*e - 1 Eric. Le vendredi 9 février 2024 à 11:57:08 UTC+1, Georgi Guninski a écrit : >

Re: [sage-support] Sagemanifolds error in example notebook

Le jeudi 8 février 2024 à 13:46:19 UTC+1, Dominic Steinitz a écrit : I volunteer Excellent! Thank you! Best wishes, Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, sen

Re: [sage-support] Sagemanifolds error in example notebook

Le jeudi 8 février 2024 à 03:14:14 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 at 7:00:07 AM UTC-8 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: I don't know about any automated way to check that the example notebooks are up to date. One can use "jupyter nbconvert --to notebook --ex

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sagemanifolds: object has no attribute 'exterior_der'

Le jeudi 8 février 2024 à 13:45:18 UTC+1, Dominic Steinitz a écrit : Sorry about posting the same thing twice. No problem. Just for reference, in case someone reads this thread: the answer about the connection forms is here: https://ask.sagemath.org/question/75256/connection-forms-not-anti-symm

[sage-support] Re: Sagemanifolds: object has no attribute 'exterior_der'

Le mercredi 7 février 2024 à 15:46:05 UTC+1, Dominic Steinitz a écrit : The example here https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/examples.html of - Electromagnetism in Minkowski spacetime [ipynb

Re: [sage-support] Sagemanifolds error in example notebook

Le mercredi 7 février 2024 à 16:00:07 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Indeed, this notebook is 8 years old and is not at all up to date (there is even Python 2 print commands in it!). Please open an issue at the Github repository hosting this notebook: https://github.com/ernestyalumni/Gravite

Re: [sage-support] Sagemanifolds error in example notebook

Hi, Le mercredi 7 février 2024 à 15:46:05 UTC+1, Dominic Steinitz a écrit : Great thanks very much - I copied from the example - I guess I should have checked the manual - I wonder if there is some way of making sure the examples are always up to date. Indeed, this notebook is 8 years old and

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.3.beta6 released

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 10.3.beta5 with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.3.beta3 released

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 10.3.beta1 with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe fro

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.3.beta3 released

Hi Vincent, Le mardi 19 décembre 2023 à 09:16:11 UTC+1, vdelecroix a écrit : Build does not work if python-flit is not present [editables-0.5] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'flit_core' [editables-0.5] Error building a wheel for editables-0.5 For the record, I don't have this issue he

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.3.beta1 released

Thanks for the release. On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - parallel build (-j16) from a fresh git clone + pull develop, with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong gave a single error: sage -t --long --random-seed=676542016572831857751872562668780748 src/sage/numerica

[sage-support] Re: limitations of "solve"?

Hi, Le mardi 28 novembre 2023 à 18:25:04 UTC+1, kcrisman a écrit : Yes. Maxima's attitude is that the square root of negative one is an expression which might have multiple values, rather than just picking one you hope might be consistent over branch points. To enforce Maxima to work in

[sage-support] Re: limitations of "solve"?

Hi, I've also noticed two days ago that https://sagecell.sagemath.org/ is very slow (actually does not terminate) even on elementary operations. Maybe there is a problem with the server at the moment... Eric. Le mardi 28 novembre 2023 à 16:36:30 UTC+1, Fernando Q. Gouvea a écrit : > Yesterd

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc4 released

Le mardi 21 novembre 2023 à 07:42:26 UTC+1, tdumont a écrit : For me: -Debian testing, up to date -upgraded from 10.2 rc3 (NO make distclean) it works: sage: -log(1-x).series(x).simplify() 1/19*x^19 + 1/18*x^18 + 1/17*x^17 + 1/16*x^16 + 1/15*x^15 + 1/14*x^14 + 1/13*x^13 + 1/12*x^12 + 1/11*

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc4 released

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 10.2.rc3, with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong fails on src/sage/libs/giac/__init__.py: sage -t --long --warn-long 65.0 --random-seed=32308605943777602951638175933820216 src/sage/libs/giac/__ini

[sage-support] Re: Odd Ricci scalar in Sagemanifolds

Hi, The complicated result that you get is due to a lack of simplification in Sage. More precisely, the default simplification chain automatically applied in tensor calculus on manifolds, namely https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/manifolds/sage/manifolds/utilities.html#sage.manifolds.ut

Re: [sage-devel] Pillow built without jpeg support in Sage 10.2.rc3

Le vendredi 17 novembre 2023 à 10:14:54 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : On 17 November 2023 04:35:53 GMT, Matthias Koeppe wrote: >Or we just let pillow use a system libjpeg if it finds one. This would probably be the easiest solution: I cannot imagine a system without libjpeg... With

[sage-devel] Pillow built without jpeg support in Sage 10.2.rc3

Hi All, Pillow provides the Python Imaging Library (PIL) https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ and is a standard package in Sage. Now, in Sage 10.2.rc3, the following code g = plot(sin(x)) # to generate a png figure g.save("fig.png") # from PIL import Image img = Image.open("fig.png") i

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc3 released

On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 10.2.rc2, with system python (3.10.12): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc2 released

Thank you for having merged https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36529 ! Eric. Le dimanche 12 novembre 2023 à 22:42:41 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.rc0 released

Thanks for the rc release. The function view() is still broken in it, but https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36529 offers a fix. It would be nice if it could be merged in the final 10.2 release. Eric. Le dimanche 5 novembre 2023 à 18:22:44 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > As always, you c

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 9.5 won't launch nor install (any version ? ) on debian testing/sid and ubuntu 23.10

Hi, In case it might help for the Ubuntu install, you may take a look at this page: https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/install_ubuntu.html Best wishes, Eric. Le mardi 7 novembre 2023 à 13:00:55 UTC+1, Laurent Bakri a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am using Debian Testing (now "Sid" because I was wonde

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 10.1 for macOs ARM randomly fails to compute the Riemann/Ricci tensor or Ricci scalar when using threads

Hi, Le lundi 2 octobre 2023 à 13:42:29 UTC+2, Alejandro Marino Vaquero Avilés-Casco a écrit : When running sagemath release version 10.1 in macOs for the arm architecture (the target tested has a M2 processor) with multiple threads, the calculation of the Riemann tensor, the Ricci tensor or t

[sage-devel] Re: Poll: deprecate backslash operator

+1 for deprecation Eric; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https:

Re: [sage-devel] Discussion and poll: should Sage Integers have a backslash operator?

+ 1 for getting rid of the preparsing of \ It is particularly annoying when typing (usually long) expressions like f(x) = x + \ 1 in an input cell of a Jupyter notebook. If the \ is followed by a blank space, one gets Cell In [22], line 1 __tmp__=var("x"); f = symbolic_expression(

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta4 released

Le lundi 25 septembre 2023 à 20:21:23 UTC+2, matthia...@gmail.com a écrit : The real error is further up in the log file: INFO: gcc -shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wl,-rpath-link,/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib -L/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/l

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta4 released

Thanks for the release. On Ubuntu 22.04, incremental build from Sage 10.2.beta3 failed with [sagelib-10.2.beta4] error: Command "gcc -shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wl,-rpath-link,/home/eric/sage/10.2/local/lib -L/home/eric/sage/10.2/local

Re: [sage-devel] Make ipympl a standard package

PS: I've just updated the notebook for checking that long math expressions are wrapped. Le mardi 19 septembre 2023 à 21:06:42 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Hi Kwankyu, > > Le mardi 19 septembre 2023 à 20:56:51 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > > Hi Eric, > > I

Re: [sage-devel] Make ipympl a standard package

Hi Kwankyu, Le mardi 19 septembre 2023 à 20:56:51 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : Hi Eric, I see no interaction in the "test_display" notebook rendered by nbviewer. This is a limitation of nbviewer. If you provide the latest version of the notebook, I can put it into the notebooks directory o

[sage-devel] Make ipympl a standard package

Hi Sage dev, In PR #36129 , which is devoted to the upgrade to Jupyter Notebook 7, we are proposing to make ipympl a standard package. ipympl is a pip-installable package that enables using the interactive features of

[sage-support] Re: Installing SageMath 10.2.beta* in Ubuntu 22.04

Hi, >From the log files, all these failures have the same origin: g++: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1plus It seems that the SageMath build has been interrupted by some external process. Have you tried https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/install_ubuntu.html ? Eric. Le mercredi 13

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.2.beta1 released

Le samedi 2 septembre 2023 à 18:14:53 UTC+2, emanuel.c...@gmail.com a écrit : On Debian testing, : - Upgrading 10.2.beta0 to beta0 to 10.2.beta1 fails by *repeatedly* failing to create one 3D plot in the documentation (lost exact reference, sorry…) ; rebuilding all documatatio

[sage-support] Re: SageMath in Docker image

Hi, You can find SageMath Docker images at https://hub.docker.com/r/sagemath/sagemath/tags The latest stable version posted here is SageMath 10.0. The image of SageMath 10.1, which has been released 4 days ago, should appear soon. Best wishes, Eric. Le mercredi 23 août 2023 à 15:23:38 UTC+2,

[sage-devel] Re: Voting: Block-scoped optional tag and the keyword

I vote for (A) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.go

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.0.rc1 released

Le samedi 29 avril 2023 à 08:26:18 UTC+2, tdumont a écrit : When upgrading from rc0 to rc1 (Debian testing) I got an error when building "manifolds" documentation: FWIW, I did the same (upgrading from rc0 to rc1) on Ubuntu 22.04 and did not get such an error. Eric. -- You received this me

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta7 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM, after make sagelib-clean sagelib-uninstall : 1/ parallel (-j16) build terminated successully ("Sage build/upgrade complete!") but with many error messages while building the documentation: [sagemath_doc_html-none] importlib.metadata.Package

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta6 released

Le lundi 27 mars 2023 à 17:06:35 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : make sagelib-clean sagelib-uninstall make This solved the issue. Thank you Dima! Eric. On Mon, 27 Mar 2023, 16:03 Eric Gourgoulhon, wrote: Le lundi 27 mars 2023 à 17:00:12 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Hi, On

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta6 released

Le lundi 27 mars 2023 à 17:00:12 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Hi, On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U @1.9 GHz + 32 GB RAM, incremental parallel (-j8) build from Sage 10.0.beta4 failed while building the documentation. Running make doc-clean doc-uninstall and then make again

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta6 released

Hi, On Ubuntu 22.04 running on Intel Core i7-8665U @1.9 GHz + 32 GB RAM, incremental parallel (-j8) build from Sage 10.0.beta4 failed while building the documentation. Running make doc-clean doc-uninstall and then make again did not help. The issue seems to be in sage.geometry.integral_point

[sage-release] Re: Sage 10.0.beta3 released

Thank you for the release. On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - build (-j16) from a fresh git clone and with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. Le vendredi 3 mars 2023 à 01:03:32 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : > As always, you can get t

[sage-support] Re: Cannot build Sage 9.7 on Opensuse

It would probably be better to use the system openblas binary instead of building it from source during the Sage install. To do so, install the Opensuse package openblas (development version) (for Ubuntu, the package name is libopenblas-dev, I don't know for Opensuse). Then run configure again

Re: [sage-devel] Creating a github team

Thanks for your reply. Le mardi 7 février 2023 à 14:33:04 UTC+1, David Roe a écrit : 4. When a component tag is added to a PR (or a new PR created with a component set), if there is no reviewer already requested then the bot will request review from someone on that component team (eventually

[sage-devel] Creating a github team

Hi, Thanks again for all the hard work for the github migration! I would like to create a team "Manifolds" of https://github.com/sagemath, with sufficient permissions so that I can add users to it. How shall I proceed? Are there any team creation request on the github interface or should some

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8

Le lundi 6 février 2023 à 10:47:28 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : Can you edit it now? Yes, thanks! Eric. I'd removed "Restrict editing to users in teams with push access only" Please also note that GitHub wikis are git repos. You can clone them in the usual way (git clone https://

[sage-devel] Re: https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8

Le lundi 6 février 2023 à 09:50:58 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : It is now in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/ReleaseTours-sage-9.8 But we don't have permissions to edit it yet. Do you know when/how we can get these permissions? Sage Days 117 have started this morning and it would be ni

[sage-devel] Re: https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8

On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 5:38:46 PM UTC+9 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: Hi, Since trac logins are now disabled, it seems that we cannot edit the 9.8 release tour. Eric. Le samedi 7 janvier 2023 à 09:02:07 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : It's time to work on the release tour for the upcoming 9.8

Re: [sage-devel] Migration to GitHub complete

Le lundi 6 février 2023 à 08:25:30 UTC+1, GMS a écrit : Huge thanks to everybody involved. +1 Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-de

[sage-devel] Re: https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8

Hi, Since trac logins are now disabled, it seems that we cannot edit the 9.8 release tour. Eric. Le samedi 7 janvier 2023 à 09:02:07 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > It's time to work on the release tour for the upcoming 9.8 release > https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8 >

Re: [sage-support] Two point tensors?

Hi, Could it be that you are looking for the pushforward operator associated to a differentiable map between two manifolds? cf. https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/manifolds/sage/manifolds/differentiable/diff_map.html#sage.manifolds.differentiable.diff_map.DiffMap.pushforward Eric. Le

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

Le lundi 30 janvier 2023 à 13:59:27 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta7, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> all tests passed except for sage -t --long --warn-long 66.8 --random-s

Re: [sage-devel] Jan 30 to Feb 4: Trac downtime, migration to GitHub

Le lundi 30 janvier 2023 à 15:07:36 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : OK, it should be read-only now (for pushing, ticket creating/modifying, other state-changing admin) Thank you Dima! Logins still work though, but they have no effect on anything, as far as I can see. Please let me know if

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.rc0 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta7, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> all tests passed except for sage -t --long --warn-long 66.8 --random-seed=81878619703120460056743231466438357448 src/sage/env.py **

[sage-devel] Re: Multiple warnings in sagemath on default fedora 37

Hi, Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 06:26:38 UTC+1, Georgi Guninski a écrit : sage: integrate(floor(x)^2,x) // Giac share root-directory:/usr/share/giac/ // Giac share root-directory:/usr/share/giac/ Added 0 synonyms x*floor(x)^2 I get this one with Sage 9.8.beta7 built from source on Ubuntu

[sage-support] Re: gridlines in 3d ?

Le mardi 17 janvier 2023 à 19:52:32 UTC+1, kcrisman a écrit : Nice ! Would you consider a ticket adding this to Sage ? +1 to that! +1 too! Don't hesitate to ask if you need help to open a ticket on https://trac.sagemath.org/. Or maybe you want to wait for the migration of SageMath sources t

[sage-support] Re: Sage 9.5 fails to start just after an installation

Maybe there is something wrong in the SageMath package for your system. Since your system is based on Ubuntu, I would advise to build SageMath from sources by following these lines: https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/install_ubuntu.html It's just a few lines to copy and paste in a terminal. The benef

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath docker image + mybinder.org

PS: I confirm that your solution works for the notebooks of https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/examples.html The start up is quite long, but if one is patient enough, it works! Le jeudi 17 novembre 2022 à 09:41:11 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Hi, > Le mercredi 16 novembre 2022 à 23:53:

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath docker image + mybinder.org

Hi, Le mercredi 16 novembre 2022 à 23:53:41 UTC+1, de...@benjamin-hackl.at a écrit : > Hey all, > > I really liked the way of making code accessible via a repository or gist > containing a bunch of notebooks together with a simple Dockerfile that has > not much more than "FROM sagemath/sagemath

[sage-devel] Re: Method 'latex.mathjax_avoid_list()' missing in the official docker image

Le mardi 15 novembre 2022 à 23:26:31 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > > The methods latex.add_to_mathjax_avoid_list and latex.mathjax_avoid_list > have been removed in Sage 9.3. So your docker image must be based on an old > version of Sage (current stable version is 9.7). >

[sage-devel] Re: Method 'latex.mathjax_avoid_list()' missing in the official docker image

Le mardi 15 novembre 2022 à 12:28:38 UTC+1, lucca@gmail.com a écrit : > When using the official docker image, from within a Notebook the > methods > >- `latex.add_to_mathjax_avoid_list()` >- `latex.mathjax_avoid_list` > > are missing on the `latex` object. > > These should exist, acc

[sage-devel] Re: The documentation built for #34730 needs your attention for checking

/shapes2.html#sage.plot.plot3d.shapes2.text3d Le mercredi 9 novembre 2022 à 22:19:23 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Le mercredi 9 novembre 2022 à 06:22:43 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> Trac #34730 rebases sage_autodoc onto the upgraded Sphinx 5.3.0. I

[sage-devel] Re: The documentation built for #34730 needs your attention for checking

Le mercredi 9 novembre 2022 à 06:22:43 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > Hi, > > Trac #34730 rebases sage_autodoc onto the upgraded Sphinx 5.3.0. It is > responsible for formatting Sage objects (functions, classes, etc.) to build > documentation. > > Please check your favorite sections in our docum

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.8.beta3 released

Thanks for the new release. On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.8.beta2, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-releas

[sage-devel] Re: Invitation: Weekly 30-minute Sage developer calls on Jitsi

Hi, Le lundi 3 octobre 2022 à 00:32:52 UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > New times: > > Calls for Europe / Africa / Americas: > > Monday noon, 12:15pm San Francisco > Monday afternoon, 3:15pm New York > Monday evening, 21:15 Paris > https://meet.jit.si/VibrantTribesBearEver >

Re: [sage-devel] DISCUSS: move Sage development to Github

Le samedi 24 septembre 2022 à 13:57:36 UTC+2, kcrisman a écrit : > > On another note, I realize that the comment I made 6 years ago after > Volker's comment is still relevant: > "There's also the non-trivial (though not blocker, probably) issue that > zillions of links to trac.sagemath.org wou

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: move Sage development to Github

+1 for GitHub -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.goo

[sage-support] Re: plot() silently switches to a different scale when numbers are too big

The plot is still linear-linear, but the y axis is labelled by y/1e6 instead of y. This is clearly a bug. Thanks for reporting it. A ticket has already been opened for this issue: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34233 Eric. Le mercredi 21 septembre 2022 à 03:18:24 UTC+2, erentar a écrit : >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

Le jeudi 15 septembre 2022 à 18:34:22 UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 9:04:09 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > >> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 6:21:09 AM UTC-7 Eric Gourgoulhon >> wrote: >> >>> I don'

[sage-devel] Re: sage zoom meeting reminder

Sorry I cannot make it this time (I am in the train). But next Thursday should be OK. Best wishes, Eric. Le jeudi 15 septembre 2022 à 16:54:32 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit : > Reminder -- that 30 minute Sage zoom meeting thing that Matthias > organized is happening in a few minutes from ri

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

Le jeudi 15 septembre 2022 à 15:32:22 UTC+2, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : > > > On Thu, 15 Sep 2022, 14:21 Eric Gourgoulhon, wrote: > >> I would like to ask about a point that does not seem to have been >> discussed before (apologies if it was): >> If the migrati

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

I would like to ask about a point that does not seem to have been discussed before (apologies if it was): If the migration to Gihub takes place, would there remain somewhere a read-only copy of Trac? more precisely, of all the Trac tickets? The numerous discussions there constitute a valuable da

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

Le mardi 13 septembre 2022 à 07:30:23 UTC+2, David Roe a écrit : > > Here's a proposal on a timeline for making a decision (I welcome feedback > from anyone who thinks this is too fast or too slow). > > * We spend another few days discussing pros and cons and refining the > proposed workflows. >

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.7.rc1 released

On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.7.rc0, with system python (3.8.10): OK - make ptestlong --> "All tests passed!" Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from thi

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >