[Akonadi] [Bug 492489] New: Akonadi EWS agent cannot sync in background

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492489 Bug ID: 492489 Summary: Akonadi EWS agent cannot sync in background Classification: Frameworks and Libraries Product: Akonadi Version: 6.2.0 Platform: Arch Linux OS: Linux

[Akonadi] [Bug 492489] New: Akonadi EWS agent cannot sync in background

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=492489 Bug ID: 492489 Summary: Akonadi EWS agent cannot sync in background Classification: Frameworks and Libraries Product: Akonadi Version: 6.2.0 Platform: Arch Linux OS: Linux

Re: Cannot setup more than one WireGuard peer

it was designed that way in principle. > If this can be assigned to an option, it's a kernel question entirely > specific to wireguard implementation. > > > ________ > From: owner-m...@openbsd.org on behalf of Consus > > Sent: Thursday, June 1

Cannot setup more than one WireGuard peer

Hi, I'm using OpenBSD 7.3 and I have the following issue with WireGuard: adding more than one peer via ifconfig breaks wgaip assignments. Initial configuration: $ doas ifconfig wg0 wg0: flags=80c3 mtu 1420 index 8 priority 0 llprio 3 wgport wgpubkey groups:

Re: new_mail_command behavior

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 03:44:56PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > So, yes, $new_mail_command, is pretty limited - basically an external > command firing of $beep_new. But the patch (from Yoshiki) was also very > simple. I don't think there's much desire to add complexity to support more > soph

new_mail_command behavior

Hi, I have some questions about the intended new_mail_command behavior. Two things are weird to me: 1. It's called only if there is no new mail already in the mailbox. 2. Format options are expanded with regards to the currently opened mailbox, not the mailbox that received mail. Is t

[gentoo-dev] Re: Confirm unsubscribe from gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

Re: pflogd write /var/run/mypflogdinstance.pid?

On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:42:20PM +0300, Consus wrote: On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 08:27:24PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: At least OpenBSD is not alone with this problem. On Debian there is a tool "/bin/pidof", trying to guess the pid of a daemon to kill by looking at the process li

Re: pflogd write /var/run/mypflogdinstance.pid?

On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 08:27:24PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: At least OpenBSD is not alone with this problem. On Debian there is a tool "/bin/pidof", trying to guess the pid of a daemon to kill by looking at the process list as well. Some dude from Google came up with a good solution (for Lin

Re: [gentoo-user] python2 really really really gone? Scripts all broken?

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 03:25:28PM +0100, n952162 wrote: "Python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020 ." There are no unmaintained packages in gentoo? You are more then welcome to support your own overlay gentoo-python2!

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Untrusted PGP signing key

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 07:08:41PM +0100, Michael wrote: > Check your /usr/share/openpgp-keys/gentoo-release.asc file. This is the hash > I get here: > > $ sha512sum gentoo-release.asc > 3b168b7e43ad2cf4f042be585abc761c5786f55c94592dc916d13a1ef5557f047e614a7d70827471ace113f16eceb4e455228c4a5f7b9

[gentoo-user] Untrusted PGP signing key

Hi guys, I've got this today: $ sudo emerge --sync >>> Syncing repository 'gentoo' into '/var/db/repos/gentoo'... * Using keys from /usr/share/openpgp-keys/gentoo-release.asc * Refreshing keys via WKD ... [ ok ] Fetching most recent snapshot ... T

Re: [gentoo-user] Update Gentoo recently is becoming difficult

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:22:32PM +0300, lego12...@yandex.ru wrote: > Yes and no. Funtoo use portage like gentoo - yes. But this is a > different distro. Without systemd and GLEP 81. Does this distro have any users aside from Angry Vincent and DRobbins?

Re: [gentoo-user] Update Gentoo recently is becoming difficult

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 05:14:39PM +0800, Pengcheng Xu wrote: > Just to remind that quite a few Debian folks use OpenRC as well; it's > in their official repos... A few :)

Re: [gentoo-user] Update Gentoo recently is becoming difficult

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:10:18AM +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote: > I'm not claiming it is not extremely popular; many of its intuitive > features render it more attractive to a general user-base, however > from a computer science perspective, it is an absolutely travesty of > modern software-

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:47:48AM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote: > Sure I do not have such skills, I am a very noob trying to build a > secure console and router, but most likely IMHO the backdoors are > targeted to be used from invisible virtualization trojans on X86? I > was even suggested to avoi

Re: [gentoo-user] Update Gentoo recently is becoming difficult

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:45:51AM +0300, lego12...@yandex.ru wrote: > And, of course, funtoo ;-). That's basically rebrended Gentoo with some additional packages.

Re: [gentoo-user] Update Gentoo recently is becoming difficult

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 09:30:49AM +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:36:34AM -0300, Raphael MD wrote: > > I’ve been noted that Systemd is putting hard dependency in things like > > Bluetooth, today is difficult rely upon a system without Bluetooth. > > systemd, and Lennart Po

Re: OpenBSD insecurity rumors from isopenbsdsecu.re

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:00:15PM +0200, i...@aulix.com wrote: > Dear OpenBSD fans, > > Can you please comment negative appraisal from the following website: > > https://isopenbsdsecu.re/quotes/ > > I did not want to hurt anyone, just looking for a secure OS and > OpenBSD looked very nice to me

Re: mutt 1.14.0 released

On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 10:16:45AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 07:27:48PM +0300, con...@ftml.net wrote: > > For some reason I feel that db operations are faster now. Any > > improvements or just that "new-shiny-release" effect? > > If you are using IMAP, then yes. Al

Re: mutt 1.14.0 released

On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 07:02:56AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 04:05:30AM +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 18:02:59 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > I'm pleased to announce the release of version 1.14.0. > > > > Thank you, great job! > >

Re: [PATCH] sysupgrade

On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 04:41:13AM -0400, Chris Bennett wrote: > The FAQ already describes exactly how to upgrade with whatever sets one > wants to. I have used that method many, many times successfully. > I can't see any reason whatsoever to turn an addon tool into anything > more than what it is.

Re: [gentoo-user] Listing kernel modules

On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 04:29:38PM +0300, Consus wrote: > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 02:19:18PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Afternoon all, > > > > Is there a straightforward way of listing kernel modules that exist > > but haven't been loaded? > > This wil

Re: [gentoo-user] Listing kernel modules

On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 02:19:18PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Afternoon all, > > Is there a straightforward way of listing kernel modules that exist > but haven't been loaded? This will do I guess: # lsmod | awk '{print $1}' > inserted # find /lib/modules/$(uname -r) -name '*

Re: The 16 partitions thread

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > Some people read replies in misc and say, "wow, Theo and the OBSD devs > are obnoxiously harsh.' > > I read the 16 partitions thread and think, "I marvel at their patience > with interlocutors who have not read the relevant source

Re: Sound is good on OpenBSD

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:01:15PM +0300, Yury Grebenkin wrote: > OpenBSD gives a better sound experience on my machine than several > Linux distributions I have used and FreeBSD. Just want to say thank > you to all the people involved and state the fact that OpenBSD does > make a difference. Bloo

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 03:10:28PM -0500, Steven Lembark wrote: > Why the hell not? I'm not saying not, I was all for it.

Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:52:52AM +0300, lego12...@yandex.ru wrote: > Nobody talk about "everything is statically linked". > However, this is a good idea ;-), but this is a topic for another > conversation :-). No wonder Yandex considers you SPAM.

Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 02:38:40PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Rust packages get no security updates. Neither do Go packages. That's > what I'm screaming about in those threads on gentoo-dev that you singled > out in your original post =) Oh... I was under the impression that $EGO_SUMS exists

Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 02:19:19PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > How do you plan to update all of your programs when there's a security > vulnerability in, say, OpenSSL? emerge -1 @world of course :D By the way, Rust does support dynamic linking (to a degree), but does not have (yet, I pray) s

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:10:33PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > No it's not. It may be time consuming, especially the first time, but > it is not difficult because the handbook explains it well. It's pretty > much a once only job too as once you have a working config you can use > it as the base f

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Tinderboxes?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:51:00PM -0500, Michael Jones wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:27 PM Rich Freeman wrote: > > > There are some QA/CI tools out there that have substantially improved > > the quality of the distro, and most of them have started out as one > > dev just creating a tinderbo

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 07:47:44PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday, 21 April 2020 17:58:03 BST Consus wrote: > > > ... and even distribution kernel is not an official thing, but a desperate > > attempt of someone to fix things. > > Eh? Desperate? Yeah,

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 08:51:57PM +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote: > You can choose between learning more about the Linux kernel (it is not > a Gentoo-specific subject) or opt to go with Genkernel instead. I'm getting paid for writing Linux Kernel code. Still, manual configuration in 2020 is not not

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 02:41:59PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > Sure, but by that standard Gentoo has been dead from day 1. :) Yeah, I remember. > I'm all for precompiled kernels or packages that build them from > source like any other Gentoo package. However, these have only been a > thing sin

Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 02:10:54PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:58 PM Consus wrote: > > > > even distribution kernel is not an > > official thing, but a desperate attempt of someone to fix things. > > > > Huh? gentoo-sources is in at l

[gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead?

Hi, In all honesty, is Gentoo dead? Gentoo-Dev is filled with passive aggression (though being developers-only mailing list), Github bot warns you that contributing new packages to the main repo is low priority and probably no one will help you, and even distribution kernel is not an official thin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: sys-kernel/gentoo-sources vs. sys-kernel/gentoo-kernel vs. sys-kernel/gentoo-kernel-bin

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:33:05PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 21/04/2020 18:05, Gerion Entrup wrote: > > what is the difference between these three packages? I don't get it from > > the description alone. > > > > gentoo-sources: A linux kernel source tree with Gentoo patchset > > gentoo

Re: [PATCH] Change Message-ID generation to be more unique and leak less information

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:33:47PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 08:27:55PM +0300, Consus wrote: > > > > Nope, hostname it is, even if you're using built-in smtp. > > > > > > False. Try it. > > > > Check my headers :)

Re: [PATCH] Change Message-ID generation to be more unique and leak less information

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:17:11PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 01:10:47PM +0300, Consus wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 07:59:01PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 02:24:22PM -0400, Remco Rijnders wrote: > > > > The

Re: [PATCH] Change Message-ID generation to be more unique and leak less information

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 07:59:01PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 02:24:22PM -0400, Remco Rijnders wrote: > > The Message-ID that mutt generates is supposed to be unique. Up till now > > mutt would generate this ID based on the current date and time, followed by > > ".G". foll

Re: GNU+Linux corporate takeover, was: Wine for OpenBSD?

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:15:20PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:05:56 -0400, Raul Miller > wrote: > > > Got any good docs on how to debug (or monitor) D-Bus issues? > > You're asking help to debug D-Bus on an OpenBSD mailing list? Why don't > you bring this sooo inter

Re: GNU+Linux corporate takeover, was: Wine for OpenBSD?

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:05:56PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:38 PM Consus wrote: > > It is modular to a degree, but separating services requires a bit of > > work so yeah, in this area systemd sucks. Documentation is pretty good > > though. I don&

Re: GNU+Linux corporate takeover, was: Wine for OpenBSD?

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:12:18PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM Consus wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:10:14PM +0200, Oddmund G. wrote: > > > I know all this, Ottavio. I have been using GNU+Linux since 1994 after > > > several ye

Re: GNU+Linux corporate takeover, was: Wine for OpenBSD?

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 05:10:14PM +0200, Oddmund G. wrote: > I know all this, Ottavio. I have been using GNU+Linux since 1994 after > several years with Ultrix/VMS/OpenVMS @DEC: Slackware in the beginning, then > Debian until the forced introduction of systemd and the rest of the crap > being cons

Re: openbsd.org down?

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 04:53:22PM +0300, Gökşin Akdeniz wrote: > On the other hand, DNS works. Maybe it's related to the network? $ ping -c 5 openbsd.org PING openbsd.org (129.128.5.194) 56(84) bytes of data. >From obsd3.srv.ualberta.ca (129.128.5.194) icmp_seq=1 Destination Port >Unreachable >

Re: Limit beeping mailboxes

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:55:32PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:43:54PM +0300, Consus wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Have you considered ability to limit mailboxes that "beep" on new mail? > > Say, I have a bunch of IMAP mailboxes: > &g

Limit beeping mailboxes

Hi, Have you considered ability to limit mailboxes that "beep" on new mail? Say, I have a bunch of IMAP mailboxes: =[account]/Inbox =[account]/Sent =[account]/Lists/Mutt-Devel =[account]/Lists/Whatever-Else1 =[account]/Lists/Whatever-Else2 =[account

Re: [gentoo-user] Unstable packages on stable Gentoo

On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 04:42:20PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 3/8/20 4:22 PM, Consus wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is it somehow possible to install unstable packages on stable Gentoo > > without manual unmasking? Say, package dev-util/perf does not have _any_ > &g

[gentoo-user] Unstable packages on stable Gentoo

Hi, Is it somehow possible to install unstable packages on stable Gentoo without manual unmasking? Say, package dev-util/perf does not have _any_ stable ebuild, so IMO there is actually no point in manual unmasking, because user does not have any choice between stable/unstable.

Re: Attachments counter broken?

gt; > (perhaps compiled in, or at least part of the system Muttrc), and > > optionally, users could override those if they found it necessary. > > It does look like the default system Muttrc file contains some attachments > defaults. Perhaps the packager supplied their own Muttrc

Attachments counter broken?

Hi, It seems like attachments counter (%X) is broken, at least in pager_format. It always expands to 0, no matter how many attached files there is.

Re: Background editing

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 12:14:47PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 10:44:02PM +0300, Consus wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 09:31:23AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > I can easily add an expando for the total number of background > >

Re: Background editing

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 09:31:23AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 04:40:13PM +0300, Consus wrote: > > God bless you, works perfectly. Is it possible to add new statusline > > format like "number of finished, yet not sent emails"? Sometimes I get

Re: Background editing

On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 06:07:18PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I thought I'd send an email to the list, since it's been pretty quiet for a > while. > > Recently, I've been playing around with background editing. This is still > in the early stages, and is very much "work i

Re: Awaiting a diff [was: Re: File systems...]

On 11:28 Fri 10 Jan, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:52:44PM +0300, Consus wrote: > > On 20:06 Thu 09 Jan, Marc Espie wrote: > > > It's been that way for ages. But no-one volunteered > > > to work on this. > > > > Anyone even kno

Re: Awaiting a diff [was: Re: File systems...]

On 11:08 Fri 10 Jan, Janne Johansson wrote: > By using the parts that OpenBSD is made up of, and not automatically moving > to other OSes as soon as you leave the comfort zone. I'm not sure, but it seems like from a user perspective there is nothing wrong with amd(8). Only that it keeps using lega

Re: Awaiting a diff [was: Re: File systems...]

On 20:06 Thu 09 Jan, Marc Espie wrote: > It's been that way for ages. But no-one volunteered > to work on this. Anyone even knows about this? Aside from OpenBSD developers (who have their plates full already) how an average person can find out that there is rusty piece of code that should be taken

Re: OpenBSD's extremely poor network/disk performance?

On 17:22 Thu 09 Jan, Hamd wrote: > Joe, are you a joke? Please stop insulting me, this is not > my/your_personal_fancy_forum. > > This will be my last post here in misc. > > Default setups, no config. changes. > Just patches installed. > Same hardware. > > FreeBSD: > freebsd@test:~ # time sh -c

Re: Awaiting a diff [was: Re: File systems...]

On 10:45 Thu 09 Jan, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 11:02:17AM +0300, Consus wrote: > > On 18:15 Wed 08 Jan, Xiyue Deng wrote: > > > It would be better to point out where to start, what hard problems to > > > solve, what work has been done in this ar

Re: Awaiting a diff [was: Re: File systems...]

On 18:15 Wed 08 Jan, Xiyue Deng wrote: > It would be better to point out where to start, what hard problems to > solve, what work has been done in this area that people can continue > to work on. They don't remember as there is no bugtracker.

Re: smtpd remove implicit ruleset behavior

On 10:54 Sun 24 Nov, Gilles Chehade wrote: > Hello, > > Ten years ago, it seemed a very neat idea that OpenSMTPD would have some > implicit defaults to avoid people creating open relays. > > Back then I was trying to make the smtpd.conf as compact as possible and > came up with the very nice idea

Re: sysupgrade to 6.6 failed at comp66.tgz

On 23:21 Sat 23 Nov, cho...@jtan.com wrote: > > You can't seriously be calling "-x* -game*" an unsupported configuration ?  > > Seems to me > > like a sensible thing to do on any box that's going to be headless for its > > entire life > > and only ever accessed via SSH (or text console at a pus

Re: Starting redis fails with 'Bus error (core dumped)'

On 22:05 Sun 17 Nov, Unicorn wrote: > On Sun, 2019-11-17 at 23:22 +0300, Consus wrote: > > On 16:25 Sun 17 Nov, Unicorn wrote: > > > After installing redis (and rspamd), before having modified any > > > part of > > > redis, starting redis with 'rcctl start

Re: Starting redis fails with 'Bus error (core dumped)'

On 16:25 Sun 17 Nov, Unicorn wrote: > Hello again, > > I am currently setting up redis with rspamd for my mail setup, but I am > encountering an issue when trying to just start redis. > For the record, I am following the guide at > https://poolp.org/posts/2019-09-14/setting-up-a-mail-server-with-

Re: new rust-libtls crates

On 17:33 Sat 02 Nov, Reyk Floeter wrote: > Why libtls? Because it is a sane TLS API with secure defaults. I > trust the decisions of the LibreSSL developers and libtls provides > some the best defaults. > > The code works on OpenBSD and Linux. Many distributions such as > Ubuntu don't seem to p

Re: OpenBSD 6.6 amd64 iavf(4) iavf / SR-iov 40G NIC lots of Jitter

On 13:33 Sun 20 Oct, Joseph Mayer wrote: > Tom, is not the jitter you are experiencing totally normal overhead > for a hypervisor. Are you sure? E.g. VM (centos) on busy as hell Proxmox instance: # ping -c 5 8.8.8.8 PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes fro

ftp(1) segfaults on 6.5 -stable

>Synopsis: ftp(1) segfaults on 6.5 -stable >Category: user >Environment: System : OpenBSD 6.5 Details : OpenBSD 6.5 (GENERIC.MP) #3: Thu Aug 8 16:14:29 CEST 2019 r...@syspatch-65-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.

Re: Package -stable updates

On 09:29 Thu 29 Aug, Florian Obser wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:39:40AM +0300, Consus wrote: > > On 19:59 Wed 28 Aug, Steven Shockley wrote: > > > So, many thanks to everyone who put together the new -stable updates for > > > packages. Is there a command I can p

Re: Package -stable updates

On 19:59 Wed 28 Aug, Steven Shockley wrote: > So, many thanks to everyone who put together the new -stable updates for > packages. Is there a command I can put in the crontab that will only > output if there are updates? Similar to what syspatch or openup does. > I tried pkg_add -unx, but that st

Re: OpenBSD -stable binary packages

On 15:30 Wed 14 Aug, Thomas Bohl wrote: > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-announce&m=156577865917831&w=2 > > > We are pleased to announce that we now also provide selected binary > > packages for the most recent release. These are built from the -stable > > ports tree which receives security and a fe

Re: Bluetooth support status

On 17:12 Tue 06 Aug, John Brahy wrote: > Hello, > > Just curious if there was any change in OpenBSD supporting bluetooth. Sadly, there is none.

[gentoo-user] Updating Gentoo

Hi, For quite a bit I'm using this script to update my stable Gentoo system: $ cat $(which sysupdate) #!/bin/sh # Update the whole system set -e echo "==> Syncing Portage tree..." emerge --sync --quiet echo "==> Up

Re: When will OpenBSD become a friendly place for bug reporters?

On 17:14 Wed 10 Jul, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:30:56AM +0300, Consus wrote: > > On 18:56 Tue 09 Jul, Roderick wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2019, cho...@jtan.com wrote: > > > > > > > Perhaps rather than

Re: When will OpenBSD become a friendly place for bug reporters?

On 18:56 Tue 09 Jul, Roderick wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2019, cho...@jtan.com wrote: > > > Perhaps rather than whining that OpenBSD lacks some specific feature, > > those who want it could write it? > > Or perhaps better not. All depends on what is a feature and for whom. > > I, as normal user,

Re: unveil(2) sysctl(8)

On 18:14 Fri 07 Jun, Ricardo Mestre wrote: > Hi, > > My eyes may be cheating me in plain sight, but sysctl(8) doesn't seem to > require fs access at all. > > Comments? OK? > > Index: sysctl.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/sysctl/s

Re: Filesystem corruption on OpenBSD routers after power outage?

On 19:30 Tue 04 Jun, Mogens Jensen wrote: > I'm going to build a router for use in a remote location, and I have > chosen OpenBSD 6.5 for the task. Unfortunately, it's not possible to > protect the router with an UPS, so it will have to be resilient enough > to survive sudden power outages and stil

Re: When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?

On 10:29 Fri 10 May, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019-05-08, Consus wrote: > > On 02:01 Tue 07 May, Clark Block wrote: > >> When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD? > > > > After binary package updates will be out-of-box, without using > &

Re: When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD?

On 02:01 Tue 07 May, Clark Block wrote: > When will be created a great desktop experience for OpenBSD? After binary package updates will be out-of-box, without using third-party M:Tier.

Re: [gentoo-user] ryzen and c-state poweroffs?

On 12:28 Fri 03 May, Spackman, Chris wrote: > > All, > > I set up a new AMD computer (moved disk from previous Intel > computer). After some struggles with bios settings, I got it to boot > properly and updated for the new hardware. All seemed fine, but then it > started "crashing" when left alon

Re: Upgrade procedure (6.4 -> 6.5)

On 15:08 Thu 02 May, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Nick Holland wrote on Thu, May 02, 2019 at 08:04:32AM -0400: > > > There is no promise that an upgraded machine will be file-for-file > > identical to a fresh install. Here is the list of problems this might > > cause you, as you can see,

Re: Upgrade procedure (6.4 -> 6.5)

On 09:42 Thu 02 May, Stuart Henderson wrote: > The upgrade notes only list files which are likely to cause a problem > if they're left lying around. Oh, okay.

Re: Upgrade procedure (6.4 -> 6.5)

On 10:27 Thu 02 May, Markus Hennecke wrote: > Am 02.05.2019 um 09:52 schrieb Consus: > > I've upgraded my systems from 6.4 to 6.5 without a glitch, but I see > > that /etc/networks and some other files (like malloc.conf.5) are still > > present, although there is no use f

Upgrade procedure (6.4 -> 6.5)

Hi, I've upgraded my systems from 6.4 to 6.5 without a glitch, but I see that /etc/networks and some other files (like malloc.conf.5) are still present, although there is no use for them in the new release. Is there a reason why these files are not listed in "FIles to remove"? Is there a way to t

Re: Malloc config became global sysctl in 6.5

On 12:43 Sat 27 Apr, Thomas Frohwein wrote: > Move along, nothing to see here. I want to see more butthurting Theo!

Re: Malloc config became global sysctl in 6.5

I like reading misc@ mostly due to the constanst BUTTHURT that is going on here. But seriously though, each program can change it's own malloc flags either by calling setenv(3) or just by updating static malloc_options variable. So there is really *NO* difference between your old way (/etc/malloc.

Re: pledge(2)

On 10:46 Thu 25 Apr, NN wrote: > but why the dumped core file has named like (restricts_the_pr.core) and not > restricts_the_process.core? Process name can be up to 16 bytes, I guess that's it.

Re: Request for testing

On 13:05 Fri 04 Jan, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 01:05:37PM +0300, Consus wrote: > > > On 08:17 Fri 04 Jan, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > If you ever thought about getting more involved and learning a bit > > > about

Re: Request for testing

On 08:17 Fri 04 Jan, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Hi, > > If you ever thought about getting more involved and learning a bit > about buikdling a current OpenBSD, there's a call for testing at > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=154521488707434&w=2 > > Testing would provide me with valuable data ab

Re: netstat *:* udp sockets

On 08:25 Mon 17 Dec, Claudio Jeker wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 05:09:06PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > > Claudio Jeker wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 01:26:25PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > > > > Philip Guenther wrote: > > > > > And, perhaps more directly, how would I block this in pf.conf

Re: netstat *:* udp sockets

On 13:38 Thu 13 Dec, Ted Unangst wrote: > netstat -an tells me I am listening to all the udp. > > Active Internet connections (including servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) > udp 0 0 *.**.* >

Re: Core Dev?

On 00:17 Tue 04 Dec, Ahmad Bilal wrote: > Can anyone tell me, > Is Antoine Jacoutot a core openbsd developer? > > And this is his account (not a impersonator?) > https://github.com/ajacoutot/aws-openbsd > > Should I take it as a official way of running OpenBSD on AWS? A quote from the source: >

Re: syntax error and doas.conf

On 10:42 Wed 31 Oct, Markus Rosjat wrote: > Hi all, > > just something I notice while trying out stuff with doas and my python > scripts. If you do a mistake and have a syntax error in the doas.conf file > you can easily look you self out from root privilages  :( > > consider a a case where your

Next release

Hi, Perhaps it's time to roll out another release? New IMAP features should benefit a lot of people.

Re: vmd: rate-limit to avoid reboot loops

On 23:32 Fri 05 Oct, Reyk Floeter wrote: > Hi, > > it sometimes happens that a VM is stuck in a reboot loop. This isn't > very pleasent for vmd, so this diff attempts to introduce a hard > rate-limit: if the VM rebooted after less than VM_START_RATE_SEC (6) > seconds, increment a counter. If thi

Re: APU2 and Spectre

On 21:11 Mon 10 Sep, Zbyszek Żółkiewski wrote: > > > Wiadomość napisana przez Consus w dniu 25.08.2018, o > > godz. 17:08: > > > > Seems like APU2 board is vulnerable to Spectre: > > seems there is microcode update with mitigations but looks like none want

APU2 and Spectre

Hi, Seems like APU2 board is vulnerable to Spectre: $ uname -r 6.3 $ dmesg | grep cpu0 | grep AMD cpu0: AMD GX-412TC SOC, 998.27 MHz $ git clone https://github.com/crozone/SpectrePoC $ cd SpectrePoC $ gmake $ ./spectre.out 85

Re: wifi gui manager

On 00:22 Wed 22 Aug, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Consus writes: > > On 18:07 Tue 21 Aug, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2018-08-21, Consus wrote: > > > > On 15:05 Tue 21 Aug, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > >> > Also what's wrong with gitlab

Re: wifi gui manager

On 18:07 Tue 21 Aug, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018-08-21, Consus wrote: > > On 15:05 Tue 21 Aug, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> > Also what's wrong with gitlab/github? > >> > >> They encourage devs to be lazy and not produce proper stable release

Re: wifi gui manager

On 15:05 Tue 21 Aug, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Also what's wrong with gitlab/github? > > They encourage devs to be lazy and not produce proper stable release assets. > Lots of mess in the ports tree from people who just tag something on github, > don't produce a stable tarball, don't generate au

  1   2   >