Here's a Debian bug report from 2019 for the same issue:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925591
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #925591
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925591
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
If we could update
/etc/default/opendkim
to mention
/lib/opendkim/opendkim.service.generate
it would be at least something to save debugging hours. One can only
wonder how many sysadmins are scratching their head right now, and how
many will be after imminent upgrade to stretch.
Best
You can use grep to detect that dig returns a non-empty string
dig +short www.google.not-com | grep -v -e '^$' > /dev/null && echo
SUCCESS || echo FAILURE
prints FAILURE
dig +short www.google.com | grep -v -e '^$' > /dev/null && echo
SUCCESS || echo FAILURE
prints SUCCESS
--
You recei
> Every package from the list for which there's no "why" found will be
> silently, with no
> indications whatsoever, scheduled for removal. If you were doing this from a
> script, or
> just copying and pasting code from somewhere, you'll be in trouble. Next time
> you happen
> to install updates
> Every package from the list for which there's no "why" found will be
> silently, with no
> indications whatsoever, scheduled for removal. If you were doing this from a
> script, or
> just copying and pasting code from somewhere, you'll be in trouble. Next time
> you happen
> to install updates
>
> Moreover, to reinstantiate it one should use install command but not markauto:
>
> aptitude markauto foo # has no effect
> aptitude install foo # really removes the flag
>
> Which is another source of confusion. See, there's more to the confusion now.
>
That should read unmarkauto:
aptitude u
>
> Moreover, to reinstantiate it one should use install command but not markauto:
>
> aptitude markauto foo # has no effect
> aptitude install foo # really removes the flag
>
> Which is another source of confusion. See, there's more to the confusion now.
>
That should read unmarkauto:
aptitude u
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> If you insist on the old behaviour, you can call e.g. "aptitude
> markauto … && aptitude install" ("aptitude install" without any
> further parameter) as a workaround.
Not nearly close to the previous behavior.
Even if I reject the uninstal
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> If you insist on the old behaviour, you can call e.g. "aptitude
> markauto … && aptitude install" ("aptitude install" without any
> further parameter) as a workaround.
Not nearly close to the previous behavior.
Even if I reject the uninstal
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.3-1+b2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Before 0.8.3 aptitude asked if one wants to remove a package if marked as
autoinstalled.
Since version 0.8.3 aptitude's behavior irreversible changed, breaking all
preexisting
assumptions. Now it doesn't ask at all, ev
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.8.3-1+b2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Before 0.8.3 aptitude asked if one wants to remove a package if marked as
autoinstalled.
Since version 0.8.3 aptitude's behavior irreversible changed, breaking all
preexisting
assumptions. Now it doesn't ask at all, ev
Fixed in the upstream:
https://github.com/slact/nginx_http_push_module/issues/83#issuecomment-37508708
https://github.com/slact/nginx_http_push_module/commit/836e8319c93681386fb00e6bd34d9e37612f3334
WBR
--- debian/modules/nginx-http-push/src/ngx_http_push_module_setup.c 2014-03-13 17:53:52.5621195
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> I can't install gcc for weeks:
> apache:[/home/dimka]# LANG=C apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.6-arm-linux-gnueabi
> Could anybody say if this is my mistake or this is a bug?
Emdebian is based on Debian 6.0 "Squeeze" as for now.
http://www.
I confirm there is same problem with PHP.
Supplied patch fixes the problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Also, no segfault when using:
--exclude-tag=CACHEDIR.TAG --exclude-tag=TEST.TAG
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tar 1.23 is not affected.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: tar
Version: 1.20-1
Severity: normal
File: /bin/tar
$ tar -cvf test.tar --exclude-caches --exclude-tag=TEST.TAG test/
test/
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ tar -cvf test.tar --exclude-caches test/
test/
test/test2/
test/test1/
test/test1/TEST.TAG
$ tar -cvf test.tar --exclude-tag=TES
Looks like it's a some kind of DNS delay:
Domain Name: GENTOO-WIKI.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com
Name Server: NS1.TIAU4.COM
Name Server: NS2.TIAU4.COM
Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Status: client
same here:
dig gentoo-wiki.org
; <<>> DiG 9.4.1-P1 <<>> gentoo-wiki.org
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 22307
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;gentoo-wiki.org.
http://rugentoo.org/
В Wed, 09 May 2007 11:39:23 +0400
Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> пишет:
> Кстати у нас есть сайт [2]. Но, к сожалению, ясной информации о том с
> чего начать там нет. Поэтому, Есть вопросы? Спрашивайте. Есть желание
> присоединится? Пишите, задавайте вопросы.
>
> Ссылки:
>
ÐагÑглил:
http://www.volchat.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15999
08.05.07, Peter Volkov<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> напиÑал(а):
ÐÑивеÑ.
Ð Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑ Ð»Ð¸ кÑо-нибÑÐ´Ñ ÑказаÑÑ Ð¿Ñавило, по коÑоÑÐ¾Ð¼Ñ Ð´Ð»Ñ ÑоÑмиÑованиÑ
множеÑÑвенногÐ
Consider using mpm_itk in place of suphp.
It appers to be much more simple and secure because not only PHP
secured but every apache process run with user's privelege.
Regards,
Alexey Kopytko
В Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:24:05 +0200
"Adam Lantos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> пишет:
You can try to overwrite current system with stage3 contents and then
rebuilt required packages.
Once I tried to downgrade the glibc in the same situation without
success.
Regards,
Alexey
> On 3/1/07, Marcelo Coelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then I tested the hardened one. Bad luck too, as
23 matches
Mail list logo
