The following PR fixes https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254024
-
Commit messages:
- 8254024: Enhance native libs for AWT and Swing to work with GraalVM Native
Image
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/562/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 17:20:38 GMT, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> The following PR fixes https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254024
>
> Hi, please send the details whose OCA you are covered under to
> [email protected] so that I can verify your
> account. Thanks!
@robilad Hi Dalibor! Have
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 18:31:50 GMT, Andrii Rodionov
wrote:
>> Hi, please send the details whose OCA you are covered under to
>> [email protected] so that I can verify your
>> account. Thanks!
>
> @robilad Hi Dalibor! Have sent you email with details.
> Thanks!
@bobvandette Could you pleas
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:57:29 GMT, Andrii Rodionov
wrote:
> The following PR fixes https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254024
Hi, please send the details whose OCA you are covered under to
[email protected] so that I can verify your
account. Thanks!
-
PR: https://git.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:41:57 GMT, Andrii Rodionov
wrote:
>> @robilad Hi Dalibor! Have sent you email with details.
>> Thanks!
>
> @bobvandette Could you please join to the review?
It is generally not expected for such a proposed change to pop up out of
nowhere from someone who is a new contrib
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 12:57:29 GMT, Andrii Rodionov
wrote:
> The following PR fixes https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8254024
src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt_xawt/xawt/XToolkit.c line 820:
> 818:
> 819: JNIEXPORT void JNICALL
> 820: Java_sun_xawt_motif_XsessionWMcommand(JNIEnv *env, jo
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:56:34 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> It is generally not expected for such a proposed change to pop up out of
> nowhere from someone who is a new contributor
> without prior discussion and so forth.
> I have no idea where this change is coming from, why we would want it, and
> h
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:26:35 GMT, Bob Vandette wrote:
>> It is generally not expected for such a proposed change to pop up out of
>> nowhere from someone who is a new contributor
>> without prior discussion and so forth.
>> I have no idea where this change is coming from, why we would want it,
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 18:31:28 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> Sorry I am not familiar with that work. Please provide more info.
Here's the JEP for the work done in JDK8 to allow libraries to be built and
used statically.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8046168
Here's the changes done to allow
The XrSwToPMBlit is a blit which is used as a direct(unscaled) blit of the
image in the memory to the pixmap. It tries
to optimize the SrcOver composite in case of an opaque source image and use Src
instead:
if (CompositeType.SrcOverNoEa.equals(comp) && (src.getTransparency() ==
Transpa
The java.desktop module has a few implementations of the finalize() method
which do nothing. We can remove such methods
if the class is not public API, and could mark these methods in the public
classes as "forRemoval = true"
-
Commit messages:
- @SuppressWarnings("removal")
- Ini
11 matches
Mail list logo
