Hi Phil,
Thanks for the clarification.
It's good that we have removed used inverseTx code.
Since we don’t have inverseTx check now, do we need to explicitly return from
draw() when we have non invertible transform.
I think we are making this somewhat specified in case of draw() API’s by
Typo : It's good that we have removed *unused* inverseTx code.
> On 13-Apr-2020, at 11:33 AM, Jayathirth D v wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
> It's good that we have removed used inverseTx code.
>
> Since we don’t have inverseTx check now, do we need to explicitly return
