Re: [5/5] msi: Move application of substorage transforms out of msi_parse_patch_summary.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.nl/JobDetails.pl?Key=1407 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (Windows 7 Professional 64 bit) === install.c:4613: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:4616: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 6 install.c:4636: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4637: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4639: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4640: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4643: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4652: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 6 install.c:4661: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:4663: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4712: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:4715: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 6 install.c:4735: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4736: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4738: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4739: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4742: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:4751: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 6 install.c:4760: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:4762: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5047: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:5049: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5050: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5082: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:5084: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5085: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5191: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:5193: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5194: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5195: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5212: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:5214: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5215: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5216: Test failed: Key doesn't exist or wrong type install.c:5269: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:5274: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 6 install.c:5279: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5292: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:5297: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 6 install.c:5298: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5317: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:5322: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 6 install.c:5323: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5336: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 2 install.c:5341: Test failed: Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got 6 install.c:5342: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5390: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_UNKNOWN, got 2 install.c:5400: Test failed: Expected ERROR_UNKNOWN_PRODUCT, got 0 install.c:5401: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_UNKNOWN, got 3 install.c:5413: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_UNKNOWN, got 2 install.c:5423: Test failed: Expected ERROR_UNKNOWN_PRODUCT, got 0 install.c:5424: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_UNKNOWN, got 3 install.c:5446: Test failed: Expected ERROR_UNKNOWN_COMPONENT, got 0 install.c:5447: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_UNKNOWN, got 3 install.c:5487: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_UNKNOWN, got 2 install.c:5501: Test failed: Expected ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND, got 0 install.c:5550: Test failed: Expected 12 or -12, got 24 install.c:5562: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_UNKNOWN, got 2 install.c:5576: Test failed: Expected ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND, got 0 install.c:5625: Test failed: Expected 12 or -12, got 36 install.c:5677: Test failed: Expected 12 or -12, got 36 install.c:5729: Test failed: Expected 12 or -20, got 36 install.c:5741: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_UNKNOWN, got 2 install.c:5755: Test failed: Expected ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND, got 0 install.c:5804: Test failed: Expected 12 or -12, got 48 install.c:5816: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_UNKNOWN, got 2 install.c:5830: Test
Re: [1/1] wcmd/tests: Attrib tests (resend)
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1423 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (Wine build VM) === Make failed
Re: shell32/tests: Skip Listview interaction tests on Vista+, list doesn't contain any items for some reason.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1735 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit shlview) === shlview.c:520: Test failed: expected not empty folder Timeout === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit shlview) === No test summary line found
Re: gdi32: "StretchDIBits" with value of zero for "xSrc" and "ySrc"
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1753 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dib) === dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 0, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 0, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 0, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTo
Re: gdi32: "StretchDIBits" with value of zero for "xSrc" and "ySrc"
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1754 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dib) === dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 227, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 227, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 33, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 103, 0, 663, 459, 0, 0, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 0, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=true, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 0, 663, 459, 33, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTopDown=false, StretchDIBits(hMemDC, 0, 0, 663, 459, 0, 61, 663, 459, pBitmapData, &bmi, DIB_RGB_COLORS, SRCCOPY)] dib.c:159: Test failed: Bitmap data not matching. [bTo
Re: [1/5] msi/tests: Return INVALID_FILE_SIZE from get_pf_file_size if the file can't be opened.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1760 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit install) === install.c:5279: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5298: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5323: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5342: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" === W7PROX64 (64 bit install) === install.c:8132: Test failed: RegQueryValueExA failed 2 (0) install.c:8855: Test failed: file not created install.c:8856: Test failed: file not created install.c:8858: Test failed: file not created install.c:8864: Test failed: file removed install.c:8869: Test failed: directory removed install.c:8916: Test failed: key not removed install.c:8926: Test failed: key not removed install.c:8937: Test failed: key not removed install.c:9011: Test failed: got 6 expected 0 install.c:9017: Test failed: got 6 expected 0 install.c:9020: Test failed: got 6 expected 0 install.c:9022: Test failed: file removed install.c:9167: Test failed: key not created === W7PROX64 (64 bit patch) === patch.c:698: Test failed: expected 1000, got 4294967295 patch.c:711: Test failed: expected 1002, got 4294967295
Re: [3/5] msi/tests: Use a unique product code when testing MsiConfigureFeature parameter validation.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1761
Your paranoid android.
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit msi) ===
msi.c:1596: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1615: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1624: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1657: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1676: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1685: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1733: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1752: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1761: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1808: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1817: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1859: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1868: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got <à(
msi.c:1965: Test failed: Expected {8BA3F294-2904-42D3-B780-7C569244693E}, got
prod
msi.c:1983: Test failed: Expected {8BA3F294-2904-42D3-B780-7C569244693E}, got
prod
msi.c:1998: Test failed: Expected {8BA3F294-2904-42D3-B780-7C569244693E}, got
prod
msi.c:2013: Test failed: Expected {8BA3F294-2904-42D3-B780-7C569244693E}, got
prod
msi.c:2031: Test failed: Expected {62D87153-CBAE-4699-86D4-C37EEE2A9901}, got
prod
msi.c:2060: Test failed: Expected {8BA3F294-2904-42D3-B780-7C569244693E}, got
prod
msi.c:2078: Test failed: Expected {8BA3F294-2904-42D3-B780-7C569244693E}, got
prod
msi.c:2093: Test failed: Expected {8BA3F294-2904-42D3-B780-7C569244693E}, got
prod
msi.c:2108: Test failed: Expected {8BA3F294-2904-42D3-B780-7C569244693E}, got
prod
msi.c:2126: Test failed: Expected {62D87153-CBAE-4699-86D4-C37EEE2A9901}, got
prod
msi.c:2207: Test failed: Expected {B8311ECD-C0EF-4937-81A1-73E7A63065CD}, got
msi.c:2213: Test failed: Expected {B8311ECD-C0EF-4937-81A1-73E7A63065CD}, got
msi.c:2237: Test failed: Expected {B8311ECD-C0EF-4937-81A1-73E7A63065CD} or
{4DF189B9-4720-46F4-B870-D7B6B32A204E}, got
msi.c:2244: Test failed: Expected {B8311ECD-C0EF-4937-81A1-73E7A63065CD} or
{4DF189B9-4720-46F4-B870-D7B6B32A204E}, got
msi.c:2278: Test failed: Expected {B8311ECD-C0EF-4937-81A1-73E7A63065CD}, got
msi.c:2307: Test failed: Expected {B8311ECD-C0EF-4937-81A1-73E7A63065CD} or
{4DF189B9-4720-46F4-B870-D7B6B32A204E}, got
msi.c:2314: Test failed: Expected {B8311ECD-C0EF-4937-81A1-73E7A63065CD} or
{4DF189B9-4720-46F4-B870-D7B6B32A204E}, got
msi.c:7303: Test failed: Expected "{805BDA38-C6AE-424D-8178-45836DB8D4D3}", got
"C:\winetest\\winetest.msi"
msi.c:7372: Test failed: Expected "{805BDA38-C6AE-424D-8178-45836DB8D4D3}", got
"C:\winetest\\winetest.msi"
msi.c:7439: Test failed: Expected "{805BDA38-C6AE-424D-8178-45836DB8D4D3}", got
"C:\winetest\\winetest.msi"
msi.c:7663: Test failed: Expected "{74818EE1-8A72-4B5E-BD11-2628E1090FDC}", got
"apple"
msi.c:7665: Test failed: Expected "{7ED2C8EE-9E50-42A4-BEDF-E42E1AA119E2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:7724: Test failed: Expected "{7ED2C8EE-9E50-42A4-BEDF-E42E1AA119E2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:7742: Test failed: Expected "{74818EE1-8A72-4B5E-BD11-2628E1090FDC}", got
"apple"
msi.c:7760: Test failed: Expected "{74818EE1-8A72-4B5E-BD11-2628E1090FDC}", got
"apple"
msi.c:7762: Test failed: Expected "{7ED2C8EE-9E50-42A4-BEDF-E42E1AA119E2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:7778: Test failed: Expected "{74818EE1-8A72-4B5E-BD11-2628E1090FDC}", got
"apple"
msi.c:7780: Test failed: Expected "{7ED2C8EE-9E50-42A4-BEDF-E42E1AA119E2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:7797: Test failed: Expected "{74818EE1-8A72-4B5E-BD11-2628E1090FDC}", got
"apple"
msi.c:7799: Test failed: Expected "{7ED2C8EE-9E50-42A4-BEDF-E42E1AA119E2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:7818: Test failed: Expected "{74818EE1-8A72-4B5E-BD11-2628E1090FDC}", got
"apple"
msi.c:7820: Test failed: Expected "{7ED2C8EE-9E50-42A4-BEDF-E42E1AA119E2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:7837: Test failed: Expected "{74818EE1-8A72-4B5E-BD11-2628E1090FDC}", got
"apple"
msi.c:7839: Test failed: Expected "{7ED2C8EE-9E50-42A4-BEDF-E42E1AA119E2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:7955: Test failed: Expected "{74818EE1-8A72-4B5E-BD11-2628E1090FDC}", got
"apple"
msi.c:7957: Test failed: Expected "{7ED2C8EE-9E50-42A4-BEDF-E42E1AA119E2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:8002: Test failed: Expected "{74818EE1-8A72-4B5E-BD11-2628E1090FDC}", got
"apple"
msi.c:8004: Test failed: Expected "{7ED2C8EE-9E50-42A4-BEDF-E42E1AA119E2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:8028: Test failed: Expected "{74818EE1-8A72-4B5E-BD11-2628E1090FDC}", got
"apple"
msi.c:8030: Test failed: Expected "{7ED2C8EE-9E50-42A4-BEDF-E42E1AA119E2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:7663: Test failed: Expected "{44750609-7030-4563-A080-485647446DEE}", got
"apple"
msi.c:7665: Test failed: Expected "{BAC6C3BA-B9D7-4696-BDDE-9A4176BC56A2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:7724: Test failed: Expected "{BAC6C3BA-B9D7-4696-BDDE-9A4176BC56A2}", got
"banana"
msi.c:7742: Te
Re: user32: Fix some tests on 2K8R2 and win7
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1768 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit win) === win.c:2929: Test failed: hwnd 04C4 message 0112 win.c:2931: Test failed: message 0112 available win.c:2938: Test failed: hwnd 04C4 message 0100 win.c:2940: Test failed: message 0100 available win.c:2952: Test failed: message 000f available win.c:2964: Test failed: message 000f available win.c:2973: Test failed: message 000f available win.c:2982: Test failed: message 000f available
Re: [PATCH] kernel32: lstrlen does not call SetLastError.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1815 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit string) === string.c:41: Test failed: Expected 0xdeadbeef, got 0x0057 string.c:47: Test failed: Expected 0xdeadbeef, got 0x0057 string.c:53: Test failed: Expected 0xdeadbeef, got 0x0057 string.c:59: Test failed: Expected 0xdeadbeef, got 0x0057
Re: [1/6] msi: Fix some test failures on Windows.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1817
Your paranoid android.
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit package) ===
package.c:7603: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""
package.c:7609: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName2", got ""
package.c:7615: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName3", got ""
package.c:7627: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName5", got ""
package.c:7633: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got ""
package.c:7639: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got ""
package.c:7655: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName8.dll", got ""
package.c:7666: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName10.dll", got ""
package.c:11655: Test failed: Expected
"{0BE69954-7B96-4254-93F8-567F63E9B7B4}", got "apple"
package.c:11682: Test failed: Expected first 3 chars of
"{0BE69954-7B96-4254-93F8-567F63E9B7B4}", got "apple"
package.c:11692: Test failed: Expected first 37 chars of
"{0BE69954-7B96-4254-93F8-567F63E9B7B4}", got "apple"
package.c:11702: Test failed: Expected
"{0BE69954-7B96-4254-93F8-567F63E9B7B4}", got "apple"
package.c:11734: Test failed: Expected
"{0BE69954-7B96-4254-93F8-567F63E9B7B4}", got "apple"
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit package) ===
package.c:8212: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""
package.c:8223: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got ""
package.c:8234: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got ""
package.c:8284: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName3.dll", got ""
package.c:8295: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName5.dll", got ""
package.c:8304: Test failed: Expected "C:\", got ""
package.c:8310: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got ""
package.c:8331: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""
package.c:8340: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mshtml: Added support for accessing select options by index.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1828 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found
Re: (resend) shell32: handle NULL pName in ShellLink fnSetDescription.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1835 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit shelllink) === shelllink.c:144: Test failed: GetDescription returned 'Some description'
Re: Destroy the window we created at the end of wait_idle_thread.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1857 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit msg) === Timeout
Re: localspl/tests: Improve the tests in test_XcvDataPort_AddPort by properly checking return values and avoiding a duplicat
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1881 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed
Re: [PATCH 4/5] d3d9/tests: Allow D3DFMT_A2R10G10B10 as supported adapter mode.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1890 Your paranoid android. === W7PRO (32 bit device) === device.c:2442: Test failed: Expected foreground window 00020142, got 00010040. device.c:2578: Test failed: Expected foreground window 00030142, got 00010040.
Re: kernel32/tests: Remove variable len which is not really used from test_CommandLine.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1901 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit process) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec
Re: user32/tests: Remove variable hdata which is not really used from test_initialisation.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1902 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dde) === dde.c:586: Test failed: Expected TestDDEServer(, got TestDDEServer:(04dc) dde.c:588: Test failed: Got size 20 for TestDDEServer:(04dc) dde.c:934: Test failed: Expected 0, got c1ae dde.c:737: Test failed: Expected '[BadCommand(Var)]', got [Command-2(Var)] dde.c:738: Test failed: Expected 18, got 32 dde.c:714: Test failed: Expected 9 or 11, got 12 dde.c:939: Test failed: Expected item atom, got dde.c:939: Test failed: Expected item atom, got 008307f4 dde.c:812: Test failed: client failed with 14 error(s) dde.c:2040: Test failed: Expected 0xdeadbeef, got 0083
Re: usp10: implement mirroring for bidi support
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1920 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed
Re: Add tests for ImageGetDigestStream
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1950 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit image) === image.c:324: Test failed: ImageGetDigestStream failed: 87 image.c:187: Test failed: flags = 0: expected 7 updates, got 3 image.c:194: Test failed: flags = 0, update 2: unexpected value image.c:187: Test failed: flags = CERT_PE_IMAGE_DIGEST_ALL_IMPORT_INFO: expected 5 updates, got 3 image.c:194: Test failed: flags = CERT_PE_IMAGE_DIGEST_ALL_IMPORT_INFO, update 2: unexpected value
Re: gdiplus: Implement bitmap color keying.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1955 Your paranoid android. === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit image) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit image) === Timeout
Re: [1/2] gdiplus: Add test for GdipGetImageThumbnail.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1959 Your paranoid android. === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit image) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit image) === Timeout
Re: [2/2] gdiplus: Implement GdipGetImageThumbnail.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1960 Your paranoid android. === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit image) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit image) === Timeout
Re: localspl/tests: Improve the tests in test_XcvDataPort_AddPort by properly checking return values and avoiding a duplicat
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1970 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed
Re: kernel32/tests: Remove variable ret which is not really used from load_blackbox. (RESEND)
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1969 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit debugger) === debugger.c:299: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the child to crash debugger.c:313: Test failed: wrong exit code : 0103 debugger.c:324: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the debugger debugger.c:146: Test failed: wrong size for 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt5825.tmp': read=0 debugger.c:329: Test failed: wrong debugger argument count: -28562032 debugger.c:330: Test failed: the child and debugged pids don't match: 660 != 2046 debugger.c:299: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the child to crash debugger.c:306: Test failed: wrong exit code : 0103 debugger.c:324: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the debugger debugger.c:146: Test failed: wrong size for 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt2D25.tmp': read=0 debugger.c:329: Test failed: wrong debugger argument count: -28562032 debugger.c:330: Test failed: the child and debugged pids don't match: 1368 != 2046 Timeout
Re: shell32/tests: Remove variable res which is not really used from init_strings.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1972 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit progman_dde) === progman_dde.c:442: Test failed: CreateGroup Group1: Expected Error DMLERR_NO_ERROR, received DMLERR_EXECACKTIMEOUT. [C_G:2] === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit progman_dde) === progman_dde.c:507: Test failed: DeleteGroup Group1: Expected Error DMLERR_NO_ERROR, received DMLERR_EXECACKTIMEOUT. [D_G:13] progman_dde.c:587: Test failed: Compound String [CreateGroup(Group3)][AddItem(C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\dde14.tmp,f1g3Name)][AddItem(C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\dde15.tmp,f2g3Name)]: Expected Error DMLERR_NO_ERROR, received DMLERR_EXECACKTIMEOUT. [CPD:14] progman_dde.c:507: Test failed: DeleteGroup Group3: Expected Error DMLERR_NO_ERROR, received DMLERR_EXECACKTIMEOUT. [D_G:15] === W7PRO (32 bit progman_dde) === progman_dde.c:369: Test failed: Window "Group1" was not created in 45 seconds - assumed failure. [S_G:12]
Re: user32/tests: Remove SetShellWindowEx from test_shell_window.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1974 Your paranoid android. === W7PRO (32 bit win) === win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 006C0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 006E0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00060138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:2664: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2664: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:2690: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2690: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 006F0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00080138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:2749: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2749: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000B012C fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00310138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00320138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00060136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000A0136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000B0136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00810178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00020142 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000B012C fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS
Re: shdocvw: implement IWebBrowser2::get_LocationName
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1977 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:1236: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI webbrowser.c:315: Test failed: unexpected nsCmdID 21 webbrowser.c:259: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_STOP === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2497: Test failed: CoCreateInterface failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:2497: Test failed: CoCreateInterface failed: 80040154
Re: gdi32/tests: Add a test to check for ERROR_NOACCESS when passing an invalid buffer to GetObject
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1981 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit gdiobj) === gdiobj.c:68: Test failed: GetObject(invalid buff), expected 0, ERROR_NOACCESS, got 0, 3735928559 === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit gdiobj) === gdiobj.c:68: Test failed: GetObject(invalid buff), expected 0, ERROR_NOACCESS, got 0, 3735928559 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit gdiobj) === gdiobj.c:68: Test failed: GetObject(invalid buff), expected 0, ERROR_NOACCESS, got 0, 3735928559 === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit gdiobj) === gdiobj.c:68: Test failed: GetObject(invalid buff), expected 0, ERROR_NOACCESS, got 0, 3735928559 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit gdiobj) === gdiobj.c:68: Test failed: GetObject(invalid buff), expected 0, ERROR_NOACCESS, got 0, 3735928559 === WVISTAADM (32 bit gdiobj) === gdiobj.c:68: Test failed: GetObject(invalid buff), expected 0, ERROR_NOACCESS, got 0, 3735928559 === W2K8SE (32 bit gdiobj) === gdiobj.c:68: Test failed: GetObject(invalid buff), expected 0, ERROR_NOACCESS, got 0, 3735928559 === W7PRO (32 bit gdiobj) === gdiobj.c:68: Test failed: GetObject(invalid buff), expected 0, ERROR_NOACCESS, got 0, 3735928559 === W7PROX64 (64 bit gdiobj) === gdiobj.c:68: Test failed: GetObject(invalid buff), expected 0, ERROR_NOACCESS, got 0, 3735928559
Re: user32/tests: Remove variable atom which is not really used from test_Expose.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1983 Your paranoid android. === W7PRO (32 bit win) === win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 006C0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 006E0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00060138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:2666: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2666: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:2692: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2692: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:2751: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2751: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 0003015A fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00300136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00310136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000301A0 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000701A0 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000801A0 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00190138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00020142 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 0003015A fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS
Re: urlmon/tests: Added a new test file for testing the IUri interface
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1987 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit uri) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit uri) === Timeout === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit uri) === Timeout
Re: [2/6] msi: Add more patch registration tests.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1996 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit patch) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit patch) === Timeout === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit patch) === Timeout
Re: [3/6] msi: Add a test to show that the InstallSource property is unchanged after an upgrade.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1997 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit patch) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit patch) === Timeout === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit patch) === Timeout
Re: [6/6] msi: Set the SourceDir property to the registered source if the product is installed.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1998 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit patch) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit patch) === Timeout === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit patch) === Timeout
Re: [PATCH 1/5] ws2_32/tests: add some socket event tests
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2019 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit sock) === sock.c:3280: Test failed: Failed to empty buffer: 0 - 0 sock.c:3281: Test failed: Expected event sequence [FD_READ(0)], got [FD_CLOSE(0)] sock.c:3285: Test failed: Failed to empty buffer: 0 - 0 sock.c:3171: Test failed: Expected event sequence [], got [FD_READ(0)]
Re: [kernel32] Return the correct processor arch and type in wow64 mode
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2036 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit process) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec
Re: [1/3] user32: Convert data in WM_DDE_EXECUTE to unicode when expected.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2058 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dde) === dde.c:586: Test failed: Expected TestDDEServer(, got TestDDEServer:(04dc) dde.c:588: Test failed: Got size 20 for TestDDEServer:(04dc) dde.c:659: Test failed: Expected 1, got 0 dde.c:692: Test failed: Expected 12, got 28 dde.c:700: Test failed: Expected 1, got 0 dde.c:922: Test failed: Expected FALSE, got 1 dde.c:939: Test failed: Expected item atom, got dde.c:942: Test failed: Expected poke, got dde.c:943: Test failed: Expected 4, got 0 dde.c:692: Test failed: Expected 12, got 28 dde.c:934: Test failed: Expected 0, got c1ae dde.c:935: Test failed: Expected empty string, got 4 dde.c:731: Test failed: Expected '[Command(Var)]', got (null) dde.c:732: Test failed: Expected 15, got 12 dde.c:939: Test failed: Expected item atom, got dde.c:750: Test failed: DdeGetData should have returned 17 not 0 dde.c:756: Test failed: Expected '[Command-2(Var)]' got t dde.c:757: Test failed: Expected 17, got 0 dde.c:886: Test failed: Execpted execute hglobal, got dde.c:892: Test failed: Expected '[Command(Var)]', got (null) dde.c:737: Test failed: Expected '[BadCommand(Var)]', got [Command(Var)] dde.c:738: Test failed: Expected 18, got 32 dde.c:895: Test failed: Expected TRUE, got 0 dde.c:896: Test failed: Expected '[Command-2(Var)]', got [Command(Var)] dde.c:714: Test failed: Expected 9 or 11, got 12 dde.c:901: Test failed: Expected '[BadCommand(Var)]', got [Command-2(Var)] dde.c:714: Test failed: Expected 9 or 11, got 13 dde.c:857: Test failed: Expected 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11, got 12 dde.c:918: Test failed: Expected TRUE, got 0 dde.c:939: Test failed: Expected item atom, got 008307f4 dde.c:812: Test failed: client failed with 15 error(s) dde.c:2040: Test failed: Expected 0xcafebabe, got 0884 dde.c:2041: Test failed: Expected 0xdeadbeef, got 0083
Re: [3/3] user32: Convert data in WM_DDE_EXECUTE to ansi when expected.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2059 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dde) === dde.c:586: Test failed: Expected TestDDEServer(, got TestDDEServer:(04dc) dde.c:588: Test failed: Got size 20 for TestDDEServer:(04dc) dde.c:659: Test failed: Expected 1, got 0 dde.c:692: Test failed: Expected 12, got 28 dde.c:700: Test failed: Expected 1, got 0 dde.c:922: Test failed: Expected FALSE, got 1 dde.c:939: Test failed: Expected item atom, got dde.c:942: Test failed: Expected poke, got dde.c:943: Test failed: Expected 4, got 0 dde.c:692: Test failed: Expected 12, got 28 dde.c:934: Test failed: Expected 0, got c1ae dde.c:935: Test failed: Expected empty string, got 4 dde.c:731: Test failed: Expected '[Command(Var)]', got (null) dde.c:732: Test failed: Expected 15, got 12 dde.c:939: Test failed: Expected item atom, got dde.c:750: Test failed: DdeGetData should have returned 17 not 0 dde.c:756: Test failed: Expected '[Command-2(Var)]' got t dde.c:757: Test failed: Expected 17, got 0 dde.c:886: Test failed: Execpted execute hglobal, got dde.c:892: Test failed: Expected '[Command(Var)]', got (null) dde.c:737: Test failed: Expected '[BadCommand(Var)]', got [Command(Var)] dde.c:738: Test failed: Expected 18, got 32 dde.c:895: Test failed: Expected TRUE, got 0 dde.c:896: Test failed: Expected '[Command-2(Var)]', got [Command(Var)] dde.c:714: Test failed: Expected 9 or 11, got 12 dde.c:901: Test failed: Expected '[BadCommand(Var)]', got [Command-2(Var)] dde.c:714: Test failed: Expected 9 or 11, got 13 dde.c:857: Test failed: Expected 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11, got 12 dde.c:918: Test failed: Expected TRUE, got 0 dde.c:939: Test failed: Expected item atom, got 008307f4 dde.c:812: Test failed: client failed with 15 error(s) dde.c:2040: Test failed: Expected 0xcafebabe, got 0884 dde.c:2041: Test failed: Expected 0xdeadbeef, got 0083
Re: [2/2] dlls/crypt32: unit test PFXImportCertStore() (2nd try)
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2067
Your paranoid android.
=== W98SE (32 bit decode) ===
decode.c:236: Test failed: succeeded in importing garbage certificate {0x57}
decode.c:249: Test failed: could not import the certificate store with a blank
password {0x57}
=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit decode) ===
decode.c:236: Test failed: succeeded in importing garbage certificate {0x57}
decode.c:249: Test failed: could not import the certificate store with a blank
password {0x57}
Re: riched20: Avoid using long.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2105 Your paranoid android. === W7PRO (32 bit editor) === editor.c:4696: Test failed: test paste: strcmp = 1, text='testing paste editor.c:4714: Test failed: test paste: strcmp = 1 editor.c:4726: Test failed: test paste: strcmp = -1 editor.c:4756: Test failed: test paste: strcmp = -1, actual = 'Ts' editor.c:5971: Test failed: Cursor is at 0 instead of 4 editor.c:5977: Test failed: Cursor is at 0 instead of 9 editor.c:5983: Test failed: Cursor is at 0 instead of 4 editor.c:5997: Test failed: Cursor is at 8 instead of 9 editor.c:6005: Test failed: Cursor is at 11 instead of 9 editor.c:6016: Test failed: Cursor is at 0 instead of 8 editor.c:6041: Test failed: Cursor is at 0 instead of 8
Re: [PATCH 2/4] wininet: Added INTERNET_OPTION_ERROR_MASK flag handling to InternetSetOptionW
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2142 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit internet) === internet.c:969: Test failed: Retrieved proxy server should've been L"proxy.example", was: L"\0001\a000\2684X\0fb4h\0200" internet.c:975: Test failed: Expected regtype to be REG_DWORD, was: 3 internet.c:1003: Test failed: Retrieved flags should've been PROXY_TYPE_DIRECT, was: 5767180 internet.c:1006: Test failed: Expected regtype to be REG_DWORD, was: 3 internet.c:1033: Test failed: Retrieved flags should've been PROXY_TYPE_PROXY | PROXY_TYPE_DIRECT, was: 5767180 internet.c:1036: Test failed: Expected regtype to be REG_DWORD, was: 3 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit internet) === Timeout
Re: quartz: Avoid using the long type.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2159 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit referenceclock) === referenceclock.c:99: Test failed: Unable to create reference clock from system clock 80040154
Re: comctl32/listview: Don't forward WM_COMMAND to parent if we don't have an Edit box
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2163 Your paranoid android. === W7PRO (32 bit listview) === listview.c:4393: Test failed: NM_HOVER allow test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual listview.c:4398: Test failed: NM_HOVER block test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual
Re: winmm: Have MCI drivers handle notification for MCI_OPEN.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2193 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit mci) === mci.c:613: Test failed: Expect message 0001 from play to 250 wait notify mci.c:620: Test failed: got 0004 instead of MCI_NOTIFY_xyz from command after close mci.c:784: Test failed: mci pause wait returned MMSYSERR 5 mci.c:798: Test failed: mci pause (space) wait returned MMSYSERR 5 mci.c:801: Test failed: mci pause wait returned MMSYSERR 5 mci.c:815: Test failed: Expect message 0004 from play (aborted by close)
Re: [6/7] msi: Test the reference count on the installer object retrieved from a session object.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2195 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit automation) === automation.c:2468: Test failed: Expected imaname, got automation.c:2485: Test failed: Expected imaname, got
Re: [7/7] msi: Add more tests for feature overrides.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2196 Your paranoid android. === W2K8SE (32 bit install) === Timeout === W7PROX64 (32 bit install) === install.c:5350: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5369: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5394: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5413: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" === W7PROX64 (64 bit install) === install.c:8203: Test failed: RegQueryValueExA failed 2 (0) install.c:8466: Test failed: file not installed install.c:8478: Test failed: file not installed install.c:8479: Test failed: file not installed install.c:8487: Test failed: file removed install.c:8488: Test failed: directory removed install.c:8494: Test failed: file not installed install.c:8495: Test failed: file not installed install.c:8503: Test failed: file removed install.c:8504: Test failed: directory removed install.c:8892: Test failed: file not created install.c:8893: Test failed: file not created install.c:8959: Test failed: file not created install.c:8960: Test failed: file not created install.c:8962: Test failed: file not created install.c:8968: Test failed: file removed install.c:8973: Test failed: directory removed install.c:9020: Test failed: key not removed install.c:9030: Test failed: key not removed install.c:9041: Test failed: key not removed install.c:9115: Test failed: got 6 expected 0 install.c:9121: Test failed: got 6 expected 0 install.c:9124: Test failed: got 6 expected 0 install.c:9126: Test failed: file removed install.c:9271: Test failed: key not created
Re: comctl32/listview: Don't forward WM_COMMAND to parent if we don't have an Edit box (resent)
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2201 Your paranoid android. === W7PRO (32 bit listview) === listview.c:4393: Test failed: NM_HOVER allow test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual listview.c:4398: Test failed: NM_HOVER block test: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0087 - actual
Re: [5/6] d3dx9: Add basic implementation of D3DXFilterTexture, plus tests
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2207 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make failed
Re: [2/2] shell32: Export ILFree by name
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2202 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit shlfileop) === shlfileop.c:2202: Test failed: SHGetNewLinkInfoA succeeded
Re: kernel32/tests: use ret in load_blackbox()
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2243 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit debugger) === debugger.c:301: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the child to crash debugger.c:315: Test failed: wrong exit code : 0103 debugger.c:326: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the debugger debugger.c:148: Test failed: wrong size for 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtADEB.tmp': read=0 debugger.c:331: Test failed: wrong debugger argument count: -28562032 debugger.c:332: Test failed: the child and debugged pids don't match: 2612 != 2046 debugger.c:301: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the child to crash debugger.c:308: Test failed: wrong exit code : 0103 debugger.c:326: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the debugger debugger.c:148: Test failed: wrong size for 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt82DC.tmp': read=0 debugger.c:331: Test failed: wrong debugger argument count: -28562032 debugger.c:332: Test failed: the child and debugged pids don't match: 2412 != 2046 Timeout
Re: user32/tests: check return value of GetUpdateRect in test_validatergn
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2251 Your paranoid android. === W7PRO (32 bit win) === win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 006C0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 006E0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00060138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:2664: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2664: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:2690: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2690: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:2749: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2749: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070132 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00300138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00310138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00090136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000D0136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000E0136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 007F0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00020142 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070132 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS
Re: Re: user32/tests: check return value of DdeClientTransaction in test_initialisation()
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2250 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit dde) === dde.c:586: Test failed: Expected TestDDEServer(, got TestDDEServer:(04dc) dde.c:588: Test failed: Got size 20 for TestDDEServer:(04dc) dde.c:934: Test failed: Expected 0, got c1ae dde.c:939: Test failed: Expected item atom, got 008307f4 dde.c:2042: Test failed: Expected 0xdeadbeef, got 0083
Re: kernel32/tests: use ret in load_blackbox() (try 2)
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2254 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit debugger) === debugger.c:302: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the child to crash debugger.c:316: Test failed: wrong exit code : 0103 debugger.c:327: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the debugger debugger.c:149: Test failed: wrong size for 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtDCAB.tmp': read=0 debugger.c:332: Test failed: wrong debugger argument count: -28562032 debugger.c:333: Test failed: the child and debugged pids don't match: 368 != 2046 debugger.c:302: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the child to crash debugger.c:309: Test failed: wrong exit code : 0103 debugger.c:327: Test failed: Timed out waiting for the debugger debugger.c:149: Test failed: wrong size for 'C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wtB1BC.tmp': read=0 debugger.c:332: Test failed: wrong debugger argument count: -28562032 debugger.c:333: Test failed: the child and debugged pids don't match: 2404 != 2046 Timeout
Re: user32/tests: check return value of GetUpdateRect in test_validatergn (try 2)
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2258 Your paranoid android. === W7PRO (32 bit win) === win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00730134 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00750134 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00060138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:2664: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2664: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:2690: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2690: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00770134 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:2749: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2749: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00040224 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00A00134 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00A10134 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00060136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000A0136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 000B0136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00190138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00020142 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00040224 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS
Re: [1/2] shell32: Export lowlevel PIDL manipulation calls by name too
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2273 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit shlfileop) === shlfileop.c:2202: Test failed: SHGetNewLinkInfoA succeeded
Re: comctl32/listview: Fix vertical position offset for subitem rectangle
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2274 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit listview) === listview.c:2214: Test failed: got 1 === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit listview) === listview.c:2214: Test failed: got 1 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit listview) === listview.c:2214: Test failed: got 1 === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit listview) === listview.c:2214: Test failed: got 1 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit listview) === listview.c:2214: Test failed: got 1 === WVISTAADM (32 bit listview) === listview.c:2214: Test failed: got 1 === W2K8SE (32 bit listview) === listview.c:2214: Test failed: got 1 === W7PRO (32 bit listview) === listview.c:2214: Test failed: got 1 === W7PROX64 (32 bit listview) === listview.c:2214: Test failed: got 1 === W7PROX64 (64 bit listview) === listview.c:2214: Test failed: got 1
Re: d3dx9_36: Implement ID3DXLine_GetDevice with tests
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2276 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed
Re: shell32: Add IShellBrowser stub to ExplorerBrowser.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2279 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed
Re: [PATCH 4/4] shell32: Add IShellBrowser stub to ExplorerBrowser.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2281 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make failed
Re: shell32: Add ExplorerBrowser with IExplorerBrowser interface stub.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2278 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make failed
Re: [PATCH 3/4] shell32: Add ExplorerBrowser with IExplorerBrowser interface stub.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2280 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make failed
Re: [PATCH 4/4] shell32: Add IShellBrowser stub to ExplorerBrowser.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2284 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make failed
Re: [PATCH 3/4] shell32: Add ExplorerBrowser with IExplorerBrowser interface stub.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2283 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make failed
Re: shell32: Export lowlevel PIDL manipulation calls by name too (try2)
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2299 Your paranoid android. === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit shlfileop) === Can't copy TestLauncher to VM: The command is not recognized by the Guest OS tools
Re: [3/3] msi: End the search for a directory signature if the parent cannot be found.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2305
Your paranoid android.
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit package) ===
package.c:7603: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""
package.c:7609: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName2", got ""
package.c:7615: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName3", got ""
package.c:7627: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName5", got ""
package.c:7633: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got ""
package.c:7639: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got ""
package.c:7655: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName8.dll", got ""
package.c:7666: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName10.dll", got ""
package.c:11676: Test failed: Expected
"{2C5EE045-5C09-40BD-93F8-086EC36919FF}", got "apple"
package.c:11703: Test failed: Expected first 3 chars of
"{2C5EE045-5C09-40BD-93F8-086EC36919FF}", got "apple"
package.c:11713: Test failed: Expected first 37 chars of
"{2C5EE045-5C09-40BD-93F8-086EC36919FF}", got "apple"
package.c:11723: Test failed: Expected
"{2C5EE045-5C09-40BD-93F8-086EC36919FF}", got "apple"
package.c:11755: Test failed: Expected
"{2C5EE045-5C09-40BD-93F8-086EC36919FF}", got "apple"
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit package) ===
package.c:8212: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""
package.c:8223: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got ""
package.c:8234: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got ""
package.c:8284: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName3.dll", got ""
package.c:8295: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName5.dll", got ""
package.c:8304: Test failed: Expected "C:\", got ""
package.c:8310: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got ""
package.c:8331: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""
package.c:8340: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""
Re: [4/4] wininet: Add tests for setting and retrieving the context value.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2306 Your paranoid android. === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit http) === http.c:406: Test failed: expected status 11 (INTERNET_STATUS_NAME_RESOLVED) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:413: Test failed: expected status 30 (INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:414: Test failed: expected status 31 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:415: Test failed: expected status 40 (INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:416: Test failed: expected status 41 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:418: Test failed: expected status 110 (INTERNET_STATUS_REDIRECT) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:443: Test failed: Wrong URL http://test.winehq.org/testredirect http.c:148: Test failed: unexpected status 10 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME) http.c:410: Test failed: expected status 10 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME) 0 times, received 1 times http.c:413: Test failed: expected status 30 (INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:414: Test failed: expected status 31 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:415: Test failed: expected status 40 (INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:416: Test failed: expected status 41 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:418: Test failed: expected status 110 (INTERNET_STATUS_REDIRECT) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:443: Test failed: Wrong URL http://test.winehq.org/testredirect http.c:148: Test failed: unexpected status 10 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME) http.c:771: Test failed: expected status 10 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESOLVING_NAME) 0 times, received 1 times http.c:774: Test failed: expected status 30 (INTERNET_STATUS_SENDING_REQUEST) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:775: Test failed: expected status 31 (INTERNET_STATUS_REQUEST_SENT) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:776: Test failed: expected status 40 (INTERNET_STATUS_RECEIVING_RESPONSE) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:777: Test failed: expected status 41 (INTERNET_STATUS_RESPONSE_RECEIVED) 2 times, received 0 times http.c:780: Test failed: expected status 110 (INTERNET_STATUS_REDIRECT) 1 times, received 0 times http.c:899: Test failed: failed to read any of the document http.c:2719: Test failed: InternetQueryOption failed: 12018 http.c:2720: Test failed: expected INTERNET_HANDLE_TYPE_HTTP_REQUEST, got 0 http.c:2725: Test failed: HttpQueryInfo failed http.c:2726: Test failed: expected size > 0 Timeout
Re: [PATCH 1/2] d3d8: Set the FPU control word on device creation.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2319 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit device) === device.c:1598: Test failed: Expected foreground window 00020210, got 00020260.
Re: [PATCH 1/7] jscript: Store builtin constructor's length in instance object.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2329 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found
Re: [PATCH 3/7] jscript: Treat no argument as "undefined" in RegExp.test.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2330 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found
Re: [PATCH 7/7] jsciprt: Added leftContext and rightCont4ext tests.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2331 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found
Re: user32/tests: check return value of GetUpdateRect in test_validatergn (try 3)
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2337 Your paranoid android. === W7PRO (32 bit win) === win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 006C0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 006E0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00060138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:2664: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2664: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:2690: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2690: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:2749: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = win.c:2749: Test failed: GetFocus() = win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070132 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00300136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00310136 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 006F0178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00730178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00740178 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00190138 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00020142 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS win.c:823: Test failed: wrong dwWindowStatus: != 0001 active 00070132 fg 00010040 in hook HCBT_SETFOCUS
Re: [PATCH] msi: Publish icons into the correct directory
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2384 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit install) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit install) === Timeout === W7PROX64 (32 bit install) === install.c:5402: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5421: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5446: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5465: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" === W7PROX64 (64 bit install) === install.c:3525: Test failed: Expected 314, got 30 install.c:8255: Test failed: RegQueryValueExA failed 2 (0)
Re: RFC: msvcrt: support dates after year 2038 in mktime64
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2394 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed
Re: msvcrt/tests: convert file to UTF-8
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2395 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make failed
Re: [PATCH] shlwapi: Implement SHGetIniStringW
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2417 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:601: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail ordinal.c:624: Test failed: returned value is not valid SD No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1773: Test failed: got 26 ordinal.c:1780: Test failed: got 11 ordinal.c:1816: Test failed: got 11 ordinal.c:1823: Test failed: got 26 ordinal.c:1831: Test failed: got 26 ordinal.c:1839: Test failed: got 37, length 38 ordinal.c:1850: Test failed: got 40 ordinal.c:1861: Test failed: got 21 === W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1780: Test failed: got 11 ordinal.c:1816: Test failed: got 11 ordinal.c:1861: Test failed: got 19 ordinal.c:1872: Test failed: got 22 === W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1767: Test failed: got 10 ordinal.c:1788: Test failed: got 7 ordinal.c:1801: Test failed: got 10 ordinal.c:1809: Test failed: got 10 ordinal.c:1839: Test failed: got 32, length 33 ordinal.c:1850: Test failed: got 35 ordinal.c:1861: Test failed: got 19 ordinal.c:1872: Test failed: got 22
Re: [msi/tests] Testcases for CREATE TABLE
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2443 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit db) === Failure running script in VM: Exceeded timeout limit of 315 sec === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit db) === Timeout
Re: advapi32/tests: Fixed -Wsign-compare warnings in security tests.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2444 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit security) === security.c:922: Test failed: Access and/or AccessStatus were changed! security.c:939: Test failed: Access and/or AccessStatus were changed! security.c:950: Test failed: Access and/or AccessStatus were changed! security.c:961: Test failed: Access and/or AccessStatus were changed! security.c:972: Test failed: Access and/or AccessStatus were changed! security.c:994: Test failed: Access and/or AccessStatus were changed! security.c:1009: Test failed: Access and/or AccessStatus were changed! security.c:1022: Test failed: Access and/or AccessStatus were changed! security.c:1035: Test failed: Access and/or AccessStatus were changed!
Re: [PATCH 1/3] shlwapi: Be less strict on which type of IShellFolder can be enumerated
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2452 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:595: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail ordinal.c:618: Test failed: returned value is not valid SD No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1767: Test failed: got 27 ordinal.c:1817: Test failed: got 27 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 27 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 38, length 39 ordinal.c:1844: Test failed: got 41 === W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1767: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1817: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 34, length 35 ordinal.c:1844: Test failed: got 37 === W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1767: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1817: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 34, length 35 ordinal.c:1844: Test failed: got 37
Re: [PATCH 2/3] shlwapi: Implement SHGetIniStringW
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2453 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:603: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail ordinal.c:626: Test failed: returned value is not valid SD No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1769: Test failed: got 13 ordinal.c:1775: Test failed: got 27 ordinal.c:1790: Test failed: got 10 ordinal.c:1803: Test failed: got 13 ordinal.c:1811: Test failed: got 13 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 27 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 27 ordinal.c:1863: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1874: Test failed: got 25 === W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1775: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1841: Test failed: got 34, length 35 ordinal.c:1852: Test failed: got 37 === W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1775: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1841: Test failed: got 34, length 35 ordinal.c:1852: Test failed: got 37
Re: [PATCH 3/3] shlwapi: Implement SHSetIniStringW
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2454 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:604: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail ordinal.c:627: Test failed: returned value is not valid SD No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1770: Test failed: got 13 ordinal.c:1776: Test failed: got 27 ordinal.c:1791: Test failed: got 10 ordinal.c:1804: Test failed: got 13 ordinal.c:1812: Test failed: got 13 ordinal.c:1826: Test failed: got 27 ordinal.c:1834: Test failed: got 27 ordinal.c:1864: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1875: Test failed: got 25 === W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1776: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1826: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1834: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1842: Test failed: got 34, length 35 ordinal.c:1853: Test failed: got 37 === W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1776: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1826: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1834: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1842: Test failed: got 34, length 35 ordinal.c:1853: Test failed: got 37
Re: advapi32: Fix GetSecurityInfo with NULL descriptor (try2:typo)
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2466 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit security) === No test summary line found
Re: advapi32: Fix GetSecurityInfo with NULL descriptor
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2467 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit security) === No test summary line found
Re: [PATCH] msi/tests: Fix install tests for Win9x
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2470 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit install) === Timeout === W7PROX64 (32 bit install) === install.c:5411: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5430: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5455: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5474: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" === W7PROX64 (64 bit install) === install.c:3534: Test failed: Expected 314, got 1 install.c:8264: Test failed: RegQueryValueExA failed 2 (0)
Re: [PATCH 1/3] shlwapi: Be less strict on which type of IShellFolder can be enumerated
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2488 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:595: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail ordinal.c:618: Test failed: returned value is not valid SD No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1767: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1817: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 36, length 37 ordinal.c:1844: Test failed: got 39 === W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1767: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1817: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 31, length 32 ordinal.c:1844: Test failed: got 34 === W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1767: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1817: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 31, length 32 ordinal.c:1844: Test failed: got 34
Re: [PATCH 2/3] shlwapi: Implement SHGetIniStringW
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2489 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:603: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail ordinal.c:626: Test failed: returned value is not valid SD No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1775: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1841: Test failed: got 36, length 37 ordinal.c:1852: Test failed: got 39 === W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1775: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1841: Test failed: got 31, length 32 ordinal.c:1852: Test failed: got 34 === W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1775: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1825: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1833: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1841: Test failed: got 31, length 32 ordinal.c:1852: Test failed: got 34
Re: [PATCH 3/3] shlwapi: Implement SHSetIniStringW
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2490 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:604: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail ordinal.c:627: Test failed: returned value is not valid SD No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1776: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1826: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1834: Test failed: got 25 ordinal.c:1842: Test failed: got 36, length 37 ordinal.c:1853: Test failed: got 39 === W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1776: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1826: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1834: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1842: Test failed: got 31, length 32 ordinal.c:1853: Test failed: got 34 === W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1776: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1826: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1834: Test failed: got 22 ordinal.c:1842: Test failed: got 31, length 32 ordinal.c:1853: Test failed: got 34
Re: kernel32: CopyFile cannot overwrite a file with itself
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2509 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit file) === file.c:603: Test failed: copying a file to itself didn't fail (ret=0, err=80)
Re: advapi32: add HKCU\Software\Classes and HKLM\Software\Classes merge tests
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2508 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit registry) === registry.c:2003: Test failed: could not open user class key, error 2 registry.c:2009: Test failed: could not create guid key, error 6 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit registry) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit registry) === Timeout
Re: advapi32: add HKCU\Software\Classes and HKLM\Software\Classes merge tests (try 2)
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2510 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit registry) === registry.c:2003: Test failed: could not open user class key, error 2 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit registry) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit registry) === Timeout
Re: advapi32: add HKCU\Software\Classes and HKLM\Software\Classes merge tests (try 3)
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2512 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit registry) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit registry) === Timeout
Re: Implement ID3DXConstantTable::GetConstantDesc
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2526 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed
Re: [1/3] msi: Create directories right before installing files.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2538 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (32 bit install) === install.c:5408: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5427: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5452: Test failed: Expected "C:\Program Files (x86)\msitest\maximus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" install.c:5471: Test failed: Expected "01\msitest\augustus", got "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData\S-1-5-18\Products\84A88FD7F6998CE40A22FB59F6B9C2BB\InstallProperties" === W7PROX64 (64 bit install) === install.c:8261: Test failed: RegQueryValueExA failed 2 (0) install.c:9173: Test failed: got 6 expected 0 install.c:9179: Test failed: got 6 expected 0 install.c:9182: Test failed: got 6 expected 0 install.c:9184: Test failed: file removed install.c:9329: Test failed: key not created
Re: msxml3: Avoid SysStringLen() testing for an empty string in ::createNode()
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2617 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit domdoc) === domdoc.c:2743: Test failed: CoCreateInstance(CLSID_XMLHTTPRequest) should have succeeded instead of failing with 0x80040154
Re: [PATCH 4/6] shdocvw: Silence QueryService traces in non-interactive runs.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2620 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:1216: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI webbrowser.c:295: Test failed: unexpected nsCmdID 21 webbrowser.c:239: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_STOP === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2479: Test failed: CoCreateInterface failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:2479: Test failed: CoCreateInterface failed: 80040154 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === Timeout === W2K8SE (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:1216: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI webbrowser.c:295: Test failed: unexpected nsCmdID 21 webbrowser.c:239: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_STOP webbrowser.c:1216: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI webbrowser.c:295: Test failed: unexpected nsCmdID 21 webbrowser.c:239: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_STOP webbrowser.c:295: Test failed: unexpected nsCmdID 28
Re: [2/2] msi: Add tests for MsiLocateComponent and make them pass.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2626
Your paranoid android.
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit msi) ===
msi.c:1622: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1629: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1648: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_ABSENT, got -1
msi.c:1649: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1650: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:1655: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_ABSENT, got -1
msi.c:1656: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1657: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:1666: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1672: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_LOCAL, got -1
msi.c:1673: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1674: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:1712: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1719: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1738: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_ABSENT, got -1
msi.c:1739: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1740: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:1745: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_ABSENT, got -1
msi.c:1746: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1747: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:1756: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1762: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_LOCAL, got -1
msi.c:1763: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1764: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:1822: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1829: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1848: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_ABSENT, got -1
msi.c:1849: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1850: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:1855: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_ABSENT, got -1
msi.c:1856: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1857: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:1866: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1872: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_LOCAL, got -1
msi.c:1873: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1874: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:1931: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1937: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_ABSENT, got -1
msi.c:1938: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1939: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:1948: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1954: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_LOCAL, got -1
msi.c:1955: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:1956: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:2008: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:2014: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_ABSENT, got -1
msi.c:2015: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:2016: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:2025: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:2031: Test failed: Expected INSTALLSTATE_LOCAL, got -1
msi.c:2032: Test failed: Expected C:\imapath, got
msi.c:2033: Test failed: Expected 10, got 260
msi.c:2129: Test failed: Expected {B17945B9-5F97-4738-B874-FF7B552A1E25}, got
prod
msi.c:2147: Test failed: Expected {B17945B9-5F97-4738-B874-FF7B552A1E25}, got
prod
msi.c:2162: Test failed: Expected {B17945B9-5F97-4738-B874-FF7B552A1E25}, got
prod
msi.c:2177: Test failed: Expected {B17945B9-5F97-4738-B874-FF7B552A1E25}, got
prod
msi.c:2195: Test failed: Expected {5CB8DCA4-4B34-40D5-AD1E-9874BCA53203}, got
prod
msi.c:2224: Test failed: Expected {B17945B9-5F97-4738-B874-FF7B552A1E25}, got
prod
msi.c:2242: Test failed: Expected {B17945B9-5F97-4738-B874-FF7B552A1E25}, got
prod
msi.c:2257: Test failed: Expected {B17945B9-5F97-4738-B874-FF7B552A1E25}, got
prod
msi.c:2272: Test failed: Expected {B17945B9-5F97-4738-B874-FF7B552A1E25}, got
prod
msi.c:2290: Test failed: Expected {5CB8DCA4-4B34-40D5-AD1E-9874BCA53203}, got
prod
msi.c:2371: Test failed: Expected {28BC538F-96F5-498D-8DAC-CA47778052B3}, got
msi.c:2377: Test failed: Expected {28BC538F-96F5-498D-8DAC-CA47778052B3}, got
msi.c:2401: Test failed: Expected {28BC538F-96F5-498D-8DAC-CA47778052B3} or
{688EC092-AFAC-4069-BD8E-9888B886BB64}, got
msi.c:2408: Test failed: Expected {28BC538F-96F5-498D-8DAC-CA47778052B3} or
{688EC092-AFAC-4069-BD8E-9888B886BB64}, got
msi.c:2442: Test failed: Expected {28BC538F-96F5-498D-8DAC-CA47778052B3}, got
msi.c:2471: Test failed: Expected {28BC538F-96F5-498D-8DAC-CA47778052B3} or
{688EC092-AFAC-4069-BD8E-9888B886BB64}, got
msi.c:2478: Test failed: Expected {28BC538F-96F5-498D-8DAC-CA47778052B3} or
{688EC092-AFAC-4069-BD8E-9888B886BB64}, got
msi.c:7467: Test failed: Expected "{42EEE0BE-35DA-4E3C-B4C0-646658D66EBD}", got
"C:\winetest\\winetest.msi"
msi.c:7536: Test failed: Expected "{42EEE0BE-35DA-4E3C-B4C0-646658D66EBD}", got
"C:\winetest\\winetest.msi"
msi.c:7603: Test failed: Expected "{42EEE0BE-35DA-4E3C-B4C0-646658D66EBD}", got
"C:\winetest\\winetest.msi"
msi.c:7827: Test failed: Expected "{506C84C3-1FD0-
Re: mshtml: Check if event_table entry is allocated before using it in remove_event_handler.
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2632 Your paranoid android. === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit events) === events.c:847: Test failed: y = -89 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -89 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -91 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -89 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -89 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -91 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -89 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -89 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -91 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -89 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -89 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -91 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 === W7PRO (32 bit events) === events.c:847: Test failed: y = -155 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -155 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -157 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -155 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -155 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -157 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -155 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -155 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -157 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -155 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -155 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -157 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 === W7PROX64 (32 bit events) === events.c:847: Test failed: y = -80 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -80 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -82 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -80 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -80 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -82 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -80 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -80 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -82 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -80 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -80 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -82 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 === W7PROX64 (64 bit events) === events.c:847: Test failed: x = -33 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -205 events.c:847: Test failed: clientX = -33 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -205 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetX = -35 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -207 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: x = -33 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -205 events.c:847: Test failed: clientX = -33 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -205 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetX = -35 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -207 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: x = -33 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -205 events.c:847: Test failed: clientX = -33 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -205 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetX = -35 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -207 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0 events.c:847: Test failed: x = -33 events.c:847: Test failed: y = -205 events.c:847: Test failed: clientX = -33 events.c:847: Test failed: clientY = -205 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetX = -35 events.c:847: Test failed: offsetY = -207 events.c:847: Test failed: screenY = 0
Re: msvcrt: Add _wmakepath_s implementation
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2647 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Make failed
Re: [PATCH 2/2] winspool/tests: Test GetPrinterData/Ex for the printspooler
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2673 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Can't determine base name
Re: [PATCH] winspool: Return ERROR_MORE_DATA, when the app probe for the needed buffersize [BUG 19624]
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2686 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Can't determine base name
Re: usp10/tests: having numbers in the ScriptStringXtoCP tests causes unpredictable behavior
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2695 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:1395: Test failed: ScriptStringFree should return E_INVALIDARG or E_FAIL not === W2K8SE (32 bit usp10) === usp10.c:1395: Test failed: ScriptStringFree should return E_INVALIDARG or E_FAIL not === W7PROX64 (64 bit usp10) === usp10.c:1395: Test failed: ScriptStringFree should return E_INVALIDARG or E_FAIL not
Re: [PATCH] winspool/tests: Handle the Windows bug in GetPrinterDataEx
Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2720 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Can't determine base name
