Good morning,
I need to know if the software is free Subversion on Windows 2003 and corporate
use?
And as the licensing and done? For machine or User?
It has a sales representative in Brazil?
Thank you,
Roberto Revilla
Tecnologia da Informação
Avibras Ind. Aeroespacial S/A
__
" Este documento é enviado unicamente com fins informativos, sendo vedada sua
utilização para propósitos particulares, não gerando obrigações e
responsabilidades entre as partes. São proibidas a reprodução e a distribuição
para terceiros de quaisquer informações contidas nesta mensagem. O risco da má
utilização desta informação é de sua inteira responsabilidade. "
" This is an informative document. It does not generate any obligation or
responsibility between the parts. It is not authorized its use for any personal
purposes. Reproduction and distribution to third parties are not allowed
without previous and written authorization. The risk of misuse of this
information is of your entire responsibility. "
-Mensagem original-
De: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 3 de fevereiro de 2012 AVIBRAS - 12:12
Para: Attila Kinali
Cc: supp...@avibras.com.br; users@subversion.apache.org
Assunto: Re: Software Subversion
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Attila Kinali wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:39:18 -0300
> wrote:
>
>> Boa tarde,
>>
>> Preciso saber se o software Subversion é free para Windows 2003 e uso
>> corporativo?
>
> Ich will ja nicht unhöflich sein, aber Englisch ist sonst die Sprache
> der Wahl, wenn man international kommuniziert. Auf Protugisisch wirst
> du leider nicht viel erfolg haben.
>
> Other than that issue, subversion is GPL and it's restrictions apply.
> You can find ample descriptions how these apply to comercial enviroments.
> Just google for them.
No, it's an Apache license:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/LICENSE
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
This kind of license does allow Wandisco to add proprietary features and
publish them without source code. For typical use and development, it's not
been a big deal, as most folks publish their modifications anyway. They're just
not *compelled* to publish modification source code to go with modification
binaries, as they would be with a GPL.