Log Entry with no details.
Guys, I have an oddity I have never seen before. I have a log entry when viewed from tortoise that has no author, actions, message and says (no date) for the date and time. any ideas? -- -- N: Jon Hardcastle E: j...@ehardcastle.com Q: The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -- -- N: Jon Hardcastle E: j...@ehardcastle.com Q: The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
Re: Log Entry with no details.
Think you might be on to something there... I'll have to try it out.. then I can sleep easy :) and not think it is corruption! On 7 October 2011 12:55, Neil Bird wrote: > Around about 06/10/11 10:07, Jon Hardcastle typed ... > > I have an oddity I have never seen before. I have a log entry when viewed >> from tortoise that has no author, actions, message and says (no date) for >> the date and time. >> > > I saw that yesterday: for me, it was a permissions thing. > > Under this repo. root were 3 dirs., and I only had read access to one of > them (trunk). Showing a log from the root in Tortoise, I saw an *entry* for > all the revs., but those that pertained to the 2 dirs. I couldn't get at > were blank except for the “(no date)” message. > > -- > [neil@fnx ~]# rm -f .signature > [neil@fnx ~]# ls -l .signature > ls: .signature: No such file or directory > [neil@fnx ~]# exit > > -- -- N: Jon Hardcastle E: j...@ehardcastle.com Q: The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
Directory Already Added Bug?
Hi, I have an issue where by i am trying to merge a directory structure from a into b. One of the changes in that structure is that a directory that is already present in b has been deleted and re-added in a. Hence I am trying to merge in the re-add. The only flagging of this I see is a tree conflict telling it was already added and the ONLY option is 'Keep the local directory' which is unlikely to be the desired actions since one went to the trouble of merging a into b perhaps one might want the 'already added' contents from a? instead of the statusquo of b? Is this correct? -- -- N: Jon Hardcastle E: j...@ehardcastle.com Q: The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
Re: Directory Already Added Bug?
Bump! On 30 January 2012 16:08, Jon Hardcastle wrote: > Hi, > > I have an issue where by i am trying to merge a directory structure from a > into b. > > One of the changes in that structure is that a directory that is already > present in b has been deleted and re-added in a. > > Hence I am trying to merge in the re-add. The only flagging of this I see is > a tree conflict telling it was already added and the ONLY option is 'Keep > the local directory' which is unlikely to be the desired actions since one > went to the trouble of merging a into b perhaps one might want the 'already > added' contents from a? instead of the statusquo of b? > > Is this correct? > > -- > -- > N: Jon Hardcastle > E: j...@ehardcastle.com > Q: The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to > vote. -- -- N: Jon Hardcastle E: j...@ehardcastle.com Q: The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
