Re: Subversion crashes on list with an empty format 3 repo
Bert Huijben wrote on Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 15:38:42 +0100: > It is probably nice to fix this specific case as it is above the FS > layer, but I don't think we should really start to look at fsfs as EOL > agnostic. I wasn't proposing to make FSFS EOL agnostic. I was proposing to make the error message ungarbled.
Re: Problem setting up authz on svnserve
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > You can do 'svnserve --foreground -d --root=/path/to/repos > --listen-port=3691 --log-file=/dev/stdout' and test against that svnserve > instance to ensure the log messages are related to a particular client > action. (You can run multiple instances in parallel.) > Thank you! This proved to be good advice. I was unaware I could run multiple svnserve processes in parallel. When I started a second svnserve process, I discovered it worked perfectly fine with my authz setup. Also, I noticed that doing "svn log" was starting to produce a "Network connection closed unexpectedly" error on the client side, making me suspicious my main svnserve process was getting flaky for whatever reason. I restarted my main svnserve process and my problem went away. I don't understand why my svnserve process starting behaving this way, but the problem is resolved for now. I was able to modify my authz file to achieve my current access goals. Many thanks for helping me get unstuck! Best regards, Rick Varney
Question to svn merge (merge just parts of a diff)
Dear users, I`m quite new to svn. I would like to know it the following in svn is possible: I have in (let`s say Revision 2) a file, that I have changed onetime (I deleted "B"), with the following content now: A C D Then, in Revision 3 an automatic update occurs. The new file has the content: A B E ...that means that some changes, that I made, are overwritten now. But that should not be. A diff between 2 and 3 would show someting like: A -C -D +B +E Is there a possibility to do (for Revision 4) a "svn merge" to get a new file, that: * "knows" that B has been deleted before, so it will not be reintegrated * does not delete C and D (I would like to declare s.th. like: Don`t delete anything that has been added in a former revision) * integrates E (as a new entry, that has not been in any former version) so that a result like: A C D E ...comes out? What I mean is: Is it possible to "have a look to a diff" and then analyze automatically by the system the single-diff parts to set some rules if the single diff-parts should be integrated or not? Thank you very much, Kai -- Dr. Kai Behncke Zentrum für Informationsmanagement und virtuelle Lehre Raum 42/06, Heger-Tor-Wall 12, 49074 Osnabrück Telefon: +49 (0)541/969-6505 http://www.virtuos.uni-osnabrueck.de
