Re: svn: E235000: error when performin a svn switch with SVN 1.7.4

2012-04-18 Thread Philip Martin
Derek Wallace  writes:

> We use SVN switch command to "switch" between different TAGs for a folder.
>
> This has being working fine with 1.6.x. However now with 1.7.4 it produces a 
> SVN error.
>
> U models/micron/MT49H3​2M18C/ReleaseNotes.t​xt
> U models/micron/MT49H3​2M18C/modulerelease.​tcl
> U models/micron/MT49H3​2M18C/rldram2.v
> U models/micron/MT49H3​2M18C/ReleaseDiff.lo​g
> D models/cypress/CY7C1​512V18/ReleaseNotes.​txt
> D models/cypress/CY7C1​512V18/modulerelease​.tcl
> D models/cypress/CY7C1​512V18/ReleaseDiff.l​og
> svn: E235000: In file 'subversion/libsvn_w​c/update_editor.c' line 1583: 
> assertion failed (action == svn_wc_conflict_action_edit || action == 
> svn_wc_conflict_action_delete || action == svn_wc_conflict_action_replace)
>
>
> The next file to be checked out is **probably** a Linux soft link and this we 
> think is what triggers the error.
>
> The file links to a file that is a subfolder of the folder CY7C1512V18
> i.e.
> CY7C1512V18.vhd is a link to vhdl/CY7C1512V18.vhd
>
>
>
> Ive tried to create a small recipe to reproduce the problem but havnt been 
> able to.
>
> What further information can I provide to help diagnose this issue.

Is it reproducible: if you start with a fresh checkout can you reproduce
the error?  Is it reproducible on a subset of the working copy: if you
checkout "cypress" rather than "models" can you reproduce the error?

Please describe the changes made by the switch.  Running

  svn diff --summarive URL_OF_WC URL_OF_SWITCH_TARGET

may help.

-- 
Philip


RE: default ignores

2012-04-18 Thread James French


From: Les Mikesell [lesmikes...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 April 2012 19:34
To: James French
Cc: Subversion Users
Subject: Re: default ignores

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:08 PM, James French
 wrote:
>
> I would say that it is up to the user to check their commit and if it 
> contains unwanted files then that fact should be visible to them and they can 
> un-add them and set up an ignore if appropriate.

Sorry, but no.  A user can't ever un-add something he has committed to
a repository.  And it is an unreasonable amount of admin time/work for
the administrator to do it with an svnadmin dump/filter/load cycle.

> Silently failing to add important files I think is worse because you simply 
> don't know that its happened until something goes wrong later.

But you just said the user was supposed to check...  It is easy to add
the missed files, but you can't un-add.

> I still believe that svn is a source control system that each user must take 
> responsibility for and configure how they want.

Of course, but defaults should be there for the common case.

> I don't think that config decisions should be taken by the core product. What 
> if a '.a' file means something else on a different platform? Its the 
> arbitrary nature of the excludes I don't like either (ie primarily supports 
> the svn dev's main platform).

That's why it is in a config file, not hardcoded.  Make it do whatever
you want.  Perhaps the clients should make it easier to see the config
and change it instead of just dropping a normally hidden file
somewhere, but that doesn't make having defaults wrong or less useful.

> One could organise it so the build trees are separate to source trees which 
> completely gets round the problem of accidentally checking in object files... 
> This is what I've got but I'm being penalised because other people mix their 
> build output files in with their source.

There is a worse problem of committing binaries in the mix, especially
if you combine a lot of projects in one repository.   How big can the
repository potentially grow and how long do you want to be down when
the time comes to rearrange or clean it up with some dump/load passes?
  Or can we just expect hardware speed and capacity to stay ahead of
this problem forever?

--
   Les Mikesell
  lesmikes...@gmail.com


Fair points. In my first point I did mean pre-commit though. I certainly take 
your point about irreversible repository bloat though. I think we both agree 
that a *per-repository* central config system would be great. Then I could have 
all the lovely ignores on the repositories that contain source code and no 
ignores on the repositorys that contain SDKs, 3rd party distros, artwork, 
animation resources etc etc (where it can really hurt when you've got twenty 
artists plowing stuff in that don't know much about subversion). That's what I 
really need. Unless its per-repository the problem always remains.
 

Re: svn: E235000: error when performin a svn switch with SVN 1.7.4

2012-04-18 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin  writes:

> Please describe the changes made by the switch.  Running
>
>   svn diff --summarive URL_OF_WC URL_OF_SWITCH_TARGET
>
> may help.

I think I may have identified it:

svnadmin create repo
svn import repo/format -mm file://`pwd`/repo/A/f
svn co file://`pwd`/repo wc
ln -s f wc/A/g
svn add wc/A/g
svn ci -mm wc
svn pd svn:special wc/A/g
rm wc/A/g
touch wc/A/g
svn ci -mm wc
svn up wc
svn up -r2 wc
svn: E235000: In file '../src-1.7/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c' line 
1583: assertion failed (action == svn_wc_conflict_action_edit || action == 
svn_wc_conflict_action_delete || action == svn_wc_conflict_action_replace)

The problem is a file that gains or loses svn:special, thus changing to
or from a symlink, without the node being replaced.

-- 
Philip


Re: svn: E235000: error when performin a svn switch with SVN 1.7.4

2012-04-18 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin  writes:

> Philip Martin  writes:
>
>> Please describe the changes made by the switch.  Running
>>
>>   svn diff --summarive URL_OF_WC URL_OF_SWITCH_TARGET
>>
>> may help.
>
> I think I may have identified it:
>
> svnadmin create repo
> svn import repo/format -mm file://`pwd`/repo/A/f
> svn co file://`pwd`/repo wc
> ln -s f wc/A/g
> svn add wc/A/g
> svn ci -mm wc
> svn pd svn:special wc/A/g
> rm wc/A/g
> touch wc/A/g
> svn ci -mm wc
> svn up wc
> svn up -r2 wc
> svn: E235000: In file '../src-1.7/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c' line 
> 1583: assertion failed (action == svn_wc_conflict_action_edit || action == 
> svn_wc_conflict_action_delete || action == svn_wc_conflict_action_replace)
>
> The problem is a file that gains or loses svn:special, thus changing to
> or from a symlink, without the node being replaced.

An ugly workaround is to delete the problem file to provoke a tree
conflict:

svn cleanup wc
svn rm wc/A/g
svn up -r2
svn revert wc/A/g

This does require that you identify the problem file.

-- 
Philip


AW: Info about SVN

2012-04-18 Thread Niemann, Hartmut
Hello Andre!

You were already told that subversion does only parts of what you need.

Maybe have a look at Redmine for web access, tickets, workflows, email 
notification and such things.
It's integration with subversion is really good.
It has WIKI and forum facilites as well.

It is still no content management system with XML capabilities, but it will 
happily
manage the files and issues of the CM system of your choice for you. 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Dr. Hartmut Niemann 



Von: Balta, Andre [mailto:andre.ba...@cubic.com] 
I am an engineer for cubic defense applications and we are considering 
using your software for a potential program. I have a list of requirement that 
my information management software needs to do. I was hoping you could confirm 
if SVN can or cant do the following:

 

· Assign authorized users with groups, roles and permissions 
(CRUD)

· Web based view and interface

· Support TLS/SSL

· Support digital signatures (certificates/CAC)

· Support Content management 

o   XML documents

o   XSLT (transforms)

o   Cascading Style sheets

o   3D models (COLLADA) - view or javascript

o   Serve Javascript enabled web pages

· Support creation of task items, assignment to action 
officers, suspense date and status

· Support version control of content (tied to issues)

· Support workflow for content 

· User defined workflow schemas

· Automated promotion based on criteria

· User promotion limited by access

· Support e-mail notification on state change




Subversion mangling passwords to apache over https

2012-04-18 Thread Cooke, Mark
Folks,

This is a follow up to the thread `Need help troubleshooting user 
authentication (apache)`:
http://subversion.markmail.org/thread/q57ffzbhrdv6ydhp

...with the hope of catching a few more eyeballs.

Quick Summary: subversion (both TortoiseSVN and the command-line client 
provided by TSVN) is changing certain characters whilst using Basic 
Authentication (over https, from Windows XP) to apache 2.2 (on Windows Server 
2003).  So far I have confirmed this for the UK keyboard `£` (SHIFT-3):

> When using a browser, I get the following for -1 
> through -0 on my UK keyboard (bounded by '[]'):
>
> 2012-04-17 16:03:09.734000 : svntest [!"£$%^&*()]
>
> ...but when I use the svn command line client I log instead:
>
> 2012-04-17 16:01:52.124000 : svntest [!"œ$%^&*()]
>
> Note that the `£` is now different.  I think that this explains
> the `Password Mismatch` error?

Philip Martin has already responded (thanks!) with:

> Non-ascii passwords are a problem for HTTP because there is
> no standard for encoding the password before constructing the
> digest, nor is there a standard for the client to tell the
> server which encoding it used.  Because there is no standard
> clients tend to do different things.  Some clients will
> convert the password to UTF-8, some clients will convert to
> some other encoding, and some clients will leave it in whatever
> encoding the user entered.

...which helps to explain the problem (except we are using `basic` plain text, 
not digest) but I cannot believe that we are the only subversion users with 
this problem, what about other users with non-latin character sets (Russia, 
Israel etc)?

How can I help to narrow this down?  Is it likely to be Windows specific (I 
don't have any *nix flavour available) or something to do with serf or neon 
(instead of svn proper)?

Should I file a bug report (I get no relevant hits when I search for 
'password')?

Regards,

~ mark c

Subversion client (on corporate Windows XP Pro SP3 using UK regional settings):

D:\>svn --version
svn, version 1.7.4 (r1295709)
   compiled Mar  8 2012, 18:47:27

Copyright (C) 2012 The Apache Software Foundation.
This software consists of contributions made by many people; see the NOTICE
file for more information.
Subversion is open source software, see http://subversion.apache.org/

The following repository access (RA) modules are available:

* ra_neon : Module for accessing a repository via WebDAV protocol using Neon.
  - handles 'http' scheme
  - handles 'https' scheme
* ra_svn : Module for accessing a repository using the svn network protocol.
  - with Cyrus SASL authentication
  - handles 'svn' scheme
* ra_local : Module for accessing a repository on local disk.
  - handles 'file' scheme
* ra_serf : Module for accessing a repository via WebDAV protocol using serf.
  - handles 'http' scheme
  - handles 'https' scheme

Server is Windows Server 2003 Std (in VMWare) also using UK regional settings:
apache 2.2.22 (Win32) DAV/2 mod_ssl/2.2.22 OpenSSL/0.9.8t mod_wsgi/3.3 
Python/2.6.6 SVN/1.7.4

I am using the svn binaries from alagazam but I don't think they are involved 
as the password is being rejected by LDAP lookup before DAV gets a look-in, 
from a site-wide ... block (there are more config 
details in the referenced thread).


RE: svn: E235000: error when performin a svn switch with SVN 1.7.4

2012-04-18 Thread Derek Wallace
Hi Philip,
Thanks for looking into this.

Im trying to create a simple recipe to illustrate the problem.
While I was  creating the recipe this happened.

# Currently I have derek1.txt as a file
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$ l
total 16
drwxrwxr-x  3 derek.wallace Intune Staff 1024 Apr 18 12:26 .
drwxrwxr-x 17 derek.wallace Intune Staff 2048 Apr 16 11:57 ..
-rw-rw-r--  1 derek.wallace Intune Staff0 Apr 16 12:17 derek1.txt
drwxrwxr-x  2 derek.wallace Intune Staff   80 Apr 18 12:26 folder1

# Delete the file
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$ rm derek1.txt

# Create Link with the same name
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$ ln -s folder1/derek1.txt


[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$ l
total 16
drwxrwxr-x  3 derek.wallace Intune Staff 1024 Apr 18 12:27 .
drwxrwxr-x 17 derek.wallace Intune Staff 2048 Apr 16 11:57 ..
lrwxrwxrwx  1 derek.wallace Intune Staff   18 Apr 18 12:27 derek1.txt -> 
folder1/derek1.txt
drwxrwxr-x  2 derek.wallace Intune Staff   80 Apr 18 12:26 folder1

# Tran and commit.
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$ svn ci -m ""
svn: E145001: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: E145001: Entry 
'/scratch-disk4/derek.wallace/IVX8000_trunk_FPGA/test/svn_links/derek1.txt' has 
unexpectedly changed special status
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$



Ill continue to try and create the receipe.

Thx
Derek





-Original Message-
From: MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of Philip Martin
Sent: 18 April 2012 09:24
To: Derek Wallace
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn: E235000: error when performin a svn switch with SVN 1.7.4

Philip Martin  writes:

> Philip Martin  writes:
>
>> Please describe the changes made by the switch.  Running
>>
>>   svn diff --summarive URL_OF_WC URL_OF_SWITCH_TARGET
>>
>> may help.
>
> I think I may have identified it:
>
> svnadmin create repo
> svn import repo/format -mm file://`pwd`/repo/A/f svn co
> file://`pwd`/repo wc ln -s f wc/A/g svn add wc/A/g svn ci -mm wc svn
> pd svn:special wc/A/g rm wc/A/g touch wc/A/g svn ci -mm wc svn up wc
> svn up -r2 wc
> svn: E235000: In file
> '../src-1.7/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c' line 1583: assertion
> failed (action == svn_wc_conflict_action_edit || action ==
> svn_wc_conflict_action_delete || action ==
> svn_wc_conflict_action_replace)
>
> The problem is a file that gains or loses svn:special, thus changing
> to or from a symlink, without the node being replaced.

An ugly workaround is to delete the problem file to provoke a tree
conflict:

svn cleanup wc
svn rm wc/A/g
svn up -r2
svn revert wc/A/g

This does require that you identify the problem file.

--
Philip

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is 
confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than 
the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any 
responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been 
transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have 
been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.


RE: svn: E235000: error when performin a svn switch with SVN 1.7.4

2012-04-18 Thread Derek Wallace
HI Philip,
Ive recreated it quite simply.

How long will it take for a new drop of SVN with a fix for this to be released?

Thx
Derek



# Current Checkout (link to a file) (245975)
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 test]$ l svn_links
total 16
drwxrwxr-x  3 derek.wallace Intune Staff 1024 Apr 18 12:44 .
drwxrwxr-x 17 derek.wallace Intune Staff 2048 Apr 18 12:48 ..
lrwxrwxrwx  1 derek.wallace Intune Staff   18 Apr 18 12:44 derek1.txt -> 
folder1/derek1.txt
drwxrwxr-x  2 derek.wallace Intune Staff   80 Apr 18 12:26 folder1


[derek.wallace@dublogon1 test]$ svn info svn_links
Path: svn_links
Working Copy Root Path: /scratch-disk4/derek.wallace/IVX8000_trunk_FPGA
URL: svn://dubsvn1/inx8000-cr1-fpga/ivx8000/trunk/trunk/test/svn_links
Repository Root: svn://dubsvn1/inx8000-cr1-fpga
Repository UUID: baad5aac-ed56-0410-b601-f48d8304e233
Revision: 245975
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: derek.wallace
Last Changed Rev: 245975
Last Changed Date: 2012-04-18 12:45:09 +0100 (Wed, 18 Apr 2012)



# switch to a revisions  (245973) that doesn't have a link, but has the file 
name
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 test]$ svn switch  
svn://dubsvn1/inx8000-cr1-fpga/ivx8000/trunk/trunk/test/svn_links@245973 
svn_links
svn: E235000: In file 'subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c' line 1583: 
assertion failed (action == svn_wc_conflict_action_edit || action == 
svn_wc_conflict_action_delete || action == svn_wc_conflict_action_replace)
Aborted (core dumped)



# remove folder
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 test]$ rm -rf svn_links

# checkout
 [derek.wallace@dublogon1 test]$ svn up svn_links -r245973
Updating 'svn_links':
Restored 'svn_links'
Restored 'svn_links/derek1.txt'
Restored 'svn_links/folder1'
Restored 'svn_links/folder1/derek1.txt'
Dsvn_links/derek1.txt
Asvn_links/derek1.txt
Updated to revision 245973.


[derek.wallace@dublogon1 test]$ svn switch 
svn://dubsvn1/inx8000-cr1-fpga/ivx8000/trunk/trunk/test/svn_links@245975 
svn_links
svn: E235000: In file 'subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c' line 1583: 
assertion failed (action == svn_wc_conflict_action_edit || action == 
svn_wc_conflict_action_delete || action == svn_wc_conflict_action_replace)
Aborted (core dumped)


[derek.wallace@dublogon1 test]$ svn cleanup
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 test]$ svn switch 
svn://dubsvn1/inx8000-cr1-fpga/ivx8000/trunk/trunk/test/svn_links@245973 
svn_links
At revision 245973.
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 test]$ svn switch 
svn://dubsvn1/inx8000-cr1-fpga/ivx8000/trunk/trunk/test/svn_links@245975 
svn_links
svn: E235000: In file 'subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c' line 1583: 
assertion failed (action == svn_wc_conflict_action_edit || action == 
svn_wc_conflict_action_delete || action == svn_wc_conflict_action_replace)
Aborted (core dumped)




-Original Message-
From: Derek Wallace
Sent: 18 April 2012 12:44
To: Philip Martin
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; Niamh Scott; Derek Wallace; Dennis Lyness
Subject: RE: svn: E235000: error when performin a svn switch with SVN 1.7.4

Hi Philip,
Thanks for looking into this.

Im trying to create a simple recipe to illustrate the problem.
While I was  creating the recipe this happened.

# Currently I have derek1.txt as a file
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$ l
total 16
drwxrwxr-x  3 derek.wallace Intune Staff 1024 Apr 18 12:26 .
drwxrwxr-x 17 derek.wallace Intune Staff 2048 Apr 16 11:57 ..
-rw-rw-r--  1 derek.wallace Intune Staff0 Apr 16 12:17 derek1.txt
drwxrwxr-x  2 derek.wallace Intune Staff   80 Apr 18 12:26 folder1

# Delete the file
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$ rm derek1.txt

# Create Link with the same name
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$ ln -s folder1/derek1.txt


[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$ l
total 16
drwxrwxr-x  3 derek.wallace Intune Staff 1024 Apr 18 12:27 .
drwxrwxr-x 17 derek.wallace Intune Staff 2048 Apr 16 11:57 ..
lrwxrwxrwx  1 derek.wallace Intune Staff   18 Apr 18 12:27 derek1.txt -> 
folder1/derek1.txt
drwxrwxr-x  2 derek.wallace Intune Staff   80 Apr 18 12:26 folder1

# Tran and commit.
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$ svn ci -m ""
svn: E145001: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: E145001: Entry 
'/scratch-disk4/derek.wallace/IVX8000_trunk_FPGA/test/svn_links/derek1.txt' has 
unexpectedly changed special status
[derek.wallace@dublogon1 svn_links]$



Ill continue to try and create the receipe.

Thx
Derek





-Original Message-
From: MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of Philip Martin
Sent: 18 April 2012 09:24
To: Derek Wallace
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn: E235000: error when performin a svn switch with SVN 1.7.4

Philip Martin  writes:

> Philip Martin  writes:
>
>> Please describe the changes made by the switch.  Running
>>
>>   svn diff --summarive URL_OF_WC URL_OF_SWITCH_TARGET
>>
>> may help.
>
> I think I may have identified it:
>
> svnadmin create repo
> svn import repo/format -mm file://`pwd`/repo/A/f svn co
> file://`pwd`/repo wc ln -s f wc/A/g svn add wc/A/g svn ci -mm wc 

Re: Subversion mangling passwords to apache over https

2012-04-18 Thread Philip Martin
"Cooke, Mark"  writes:

> Quick Summary: subversion (both TortoiseSVN and the command-line
> client provided by TSVN) is changing certain characters whilst using
> Basic Authentication (over https, from Windows XP) to apache 2.2 (on
> Windows Server 2003).  So far I have confirmed this for the UK
> keyboard `£` (SHIFT-3):
>
>> When using a browser, I get the following for -1 
>> through -0 on my UK keyboard (bounded by '[]'):
>>
>> 2012-04-17 16:03:09.734000 : svntest [!"£$%^&*()]
>>
>> ...but when I use the svn command line client I log instead:
>>
>> 2012-04-17 16:01:52.124000 : svntest [!"œ$%^&*()]
>>
>> Note that the `£` is now different.  I think that this explains
>> the `Password Mismatch` error?
>
> Philip Martin has already responded (thanks!) with:
>
>> Non-ascii passwords are a problem for HTTP because there is
>> no standard for encoding the password before constructing the
>> digest, nor is there a standard for the client to tell the
>> server which encoding it used.  Because there is no standard
>> clients tend to do different things.  Some clients will
>> convert the password to UTF-8, some clients will convert to
>> some other encoding, and some clients will leave it in whatever
>> encoding the user entered.
>
> ...which helps to explain the problem (except we are using `basic`
> plain text, not digest) but I cannot believe that we are the only
> subversion users with this problem, what about other users with
> non-latin character sets (Russia, Israel etc)?

You have exactly the same problem with basic auth, there is no standard
for encoding non-ASCII passwords.  It's generally possible to adjust the
password storage on the server so that any given client works, but it
not possible to get all clients to work.

Suppose I have a password consisting of a single '£' character.  In
ISO-8859-1 that is the single byte 0xA3, in UTF-8 that is two bytes 0xC2
0xA3.  If I combine that with a username pm2 the the basic auth token is
given by

  $ echo -n pm2:£ | base64

In ISO-8859-1 this gives 'cG0yOqM=' while in UTF-8 it gives 'cG0yOsKj'.

When you store the password on the server in an htpasswd file you choose
to store either the literal passowrd or a password hash.  If you store
the password literally as the line

   pm2:£

you have to choose how to store the password.  If you use the one-byte
form the 'cG0yOqM=' auth token will work, if you use the two-byte form
the 'cG0yOsKj' auth token will work.  If you use some other form, such
as UTF-16, then neither of those tokens will work.

It's more usual to store password hashes but the same problem occurs.
If you store the password hash, using a salt AA, it's typically

   $ mkpassword £ AA

in IS0-8859-1 this leads to the line

   pm2:AACiVWnPwZTeE

and the 'cG0yOqM=' token will work.  In UTF-8 it leads to the line

   pm2:AAzOZFufPfaOQ

and the 'cG0yOsKj' token will work.

A client like curl does no password encoding conversion, so the command

   $ curl http://... -u pm2:£

will send the token 'cG0yOqM=' when running in an IS0-8859-1 environment
and the token 'cG0yOsKj' when running in UTF-8.  Only one of these will
work depending on how the htpasswd file is set up.

A client like the svn converts passwords from the command line or
keyboard to UTF-8 so the command

   $ svn cat http://... --username pm --password £

will always send the 'cG0yOsKj' auth token.  This will work if the
htpasswd has been setup for UTF-8 and it will work whatever environment
is being used by the client, but will fail if the htpasswd file has not
been setup for UTF-8

Other clients such as TSVN or web browsers may behave like curl, or they
may behave like svn, or they may do something else.  By adjusting the
setup on the server you can generally get any given client to work in
any given encoding, but there is no way to get all clients to work in
all encodings.

It gets even more complicated when you consider password caching: the
passwords that Subversion stores are in UTF-8 and Subversion assumes
that they are still UTF-8 when retrieved.  However if the password store
is shared with other clients, say a web browser, then those other
clients may have stored non-UTF-8 passwords and this will cause
Subversion to send non-UTF-8 auth tokens.  That works if the server is
setup so that non-UTF-8 tokens work.

-- 
Philip


Re: svn: E235000: error when performin a svn switch with SVN 1.7.4

2012-04-18 Thread Philip Martin
Derek Wallace  writes:

> How long will it take for a new drop of SVN with a fix for this to be
> released?

See http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4160

-- 
Philip


Re: AW: Info about SVN

2012-04-18 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Andre seems to be going through a checklist of specific features, not 
necessarily part of any one tool like Subversion. It's like looking on Craig's 
list for houses with swimming pools, helipads, and low mortgage rates. It's 
conceivable but very unlikely to find all those features.

Andre, I urge you to talk with the commercial vendors like Wandisco about 
enterprise suites. What features they lack, they may be able to design and sell 
you.




Re: default ignores

2012-04-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt

On Apr 17, 2012, at 13:34, Les Mikesell wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:08 PM, James French wrote:
>> 
>> I would say that it is up to the user to check their commit and if it 
>> contains unwanted files then that fact should be visible to them and they 
>> can un-add them and set up an ignore if appropriate.
> 
> Sorry, but no.  A user can't ever un-add something he has committed to
> a repository.  And it is an unreasonable amount of admin time/work for
> the administrator to do it with an svnadmin dump/filter/load cycle.
> 
>> Silently failing to add important files I think is worse because you simply 
>> don't know that its happened until something goes wrong later.
> 
> But you just said the user was supposed to check...  It is easy to add
> the missed files, but you can't un-add.

Well, yes you can un-add something:

Add:

$ svn add foo
A foo

Un-add:

$ svn revert foo
Reverted 'foo'

There are several places where this information can be found by Googling "svn 
unadd".

But if you commit the addition:

$ svn add foo
A foo
$ svn ci foo -m x
Adding foo
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 1.

Then you're right you can't un-commit that; you'd have to reverse merge, and 
there'd be a permanent record of it in the repository.



Re: default ignores

2012-04-18 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:00 AM, James French
 wrote:
>
> 
> From: Les Mikesell [lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 17 April 2012 19:34
> To: James French
> Cc: Subversion Users
> Subject: Re: default ignores
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:08 PM, James French
>  wrote:
>>
>> I would say that it is up to the user to check their commit and if it 
>> contains unwanted files then that fact should be visible to them and they 
>> can un-add them and set up an ignore if appropriate.
>
> Sorry, but no.  A user can't ever un-add something he has committed to
> a repository.  And it is an unreasonable amount of admin time/work for
> the administrator to do it with an svnadmin dump/filter/load cycle.
>
>> Silently failing to add important files I think is worse because you simply 
>> don't know that its happened until something goes wrong later.
>
> But you just said the user was supposed to check...  It is easy to add
> the missed files, but you can't un-add.
>
>> I still believe that svn is a source control system that each user must take 
>> responsibility for and configure how they want.
>
> Of course, but defaults should be there for the common case.
>
>> I don't think that config decisions should be taken by the core product. 
>> What if a '.a' file means something else on a different platform? Its the 
>> arbitrary nature of the excludes I don't like either (ie primarily supports 
>> the svn dev's main platform).
>
> That's why it is in a config file, not hardcoded.  Make it do whatever
> you want.  Perhaps the clients should make it easier to see the config
> and change it instead of just dropping a normally hidden file
> somewhere, but that doesn't make having defaults wrong or less useful.
>
>> One could organise it so the build trees are separate to source trees which 
>> completely gets round the problem of accidentally checking in object 
>> files... This is what I've got but I'm being penalised because other people 
>> mix their build output files in with their source.
>
> There is a worse problem of committing binaries in the mix, especially
> if you combine a lot of projects in one repository.   How big can the
> repository potentially grow and how long do you want to be down when
> the time comes to rearrange or clean it up with some dump/load passes?
>  Or can we just expect hardware speed and capacity to stay ahead of
> this problem forever?
>
> --
>   Les Mikesell
>      lesmikes...@gmail.com
>
>
> Fair points. In my first point I did mean pre-commit though. I certainly take 
> your point about irreversible repository bloat though. I think we both agree 
> that a *per-repository* central config system would be great. Then I could 
> have all the lovely ignores on the repositories that contain source code and 
> no ignores on the repositorys that contain SDKs, 3rd party distros, artwork, 
> animation resources etc etc (where it can really hurt when you've got twenty 
> artists plowing stuff in that don't know much about subversion). That's what 
> I really need. Unless its per-repository the problem always remains.
>

You may be interested to know that work is being done currently on
"inheritable properties", with amongst others the goal of enabling
"repository dictated configuration" (with svn:ignore or global-ignores
definitely on the radar as a concrete use case). It's too early to
tell how it will turn out concretely, and when it will be finished.
But I'd just thought of letting you know that there may be some
improvement on the horizon.

See this design doc on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/InheritedProperties

And a dev-thread with lots of discussion (note: it's a long thread,
but contains some interesting discussions and ideas, amongst others
about the ignore property):
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-01/0032.shtml

Paul Burba is currently working on a feature branch to see how the
current design (see wiki) turns out in practice:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/inheritable-props/

-- 
Johan