[Bug 253422] Re: Realtek ALC883 speakers don't mute when headphones plugged in
I just wanted to add that the option targa-2ch-dig also solved my problems in a MSI laptop, model MS-1637 (PR600) -- Realtek ALC883 speakers don't mute when headphones plugged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253422 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 253422] Re: Realtek ALC883 speakers don't mute when headphones plugged in
I don't have spdif either, but I've been using this workaround for more than a year now (since Gutsy), and everything worked fine with mic, headphones. And another thing, I didn't choose targa-2ch-dig because I found this bug report - it didn't exist back then - I tried the different options at ALSA-Configuration.txt for ALC883, and this was the only one that made things work back then. One detail, the options available in ALSA-Configuration.txt were a lot less one year ago (something like 6 or 7, now there are 21). So it may be that there is some other option that makes it all work. -- Realtek ALC883 speakers don't mute when headphones plugged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253422 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 69271] Re: Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery Partition with MSWin
thanks for the help! I used the 6.06 Desktop/Live CD, that I downloaded from a local mirror site indicated in ubuntu.com. On 03/11/06, towsonu2003 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks for the bug report. which CD did you use? Alternative CD or the > Desktop / Live CD? > > ** Changed in: Ubuntu >Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info > > -- > Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery > Partition with MSWin > https://launchpad.net/bugs/69271 > -- fotos.sapo.pt/atanasio -- Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery Partition with MSWin https://launchpad.net/bugs/69271 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 69271] Re: Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery Partition with MSWin
here they are ** Attachment added: "/var/log/installer/syslog" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4964558/syslog -- Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery Partition with MSWin https://launchpad.net/bugs/69271 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 69271] Re: Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery Partition with MSWin
** Attachment added: "/var/log/syslog" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4964559/syslog -- Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery Partition with MSWin https://launchpad.net/bugs/69271 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 69271] Re: Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery Partition with MSWin
** Attachment added: "/var/log/installer/partman" http://librarian.launchpad.net/4964560/partman -- Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery Partition with MSWin https://launchpad.net/bugs/69271 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224760] Re: Unable to copy files to Novell Netware drive - ncpfs Nautilus
I confirm this problem in nautilis. In the shell it works perfectly. -- Unable to copy files to Novell Netware drive - ncpfs Nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224760 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118174] Re: Network seems dead after disconnect
Same thing here. I have no clue if this is important, but I use predefined DNS servers (in the network configuration) following my ISP recommendations (nothing to do with the VPN server I connect to) -- Network seems dead after disconnect https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 122045] Re: "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3
Nope. Old Pentium On 24/09/2007, Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you use amd64? > > -- > "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122045 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 122045] Re: "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3
As I said, the problem is "solved" now that I have a clean Feisty installation, so I guess there is no use in sending the file (I'll be glad to do it, in case you think it's worth it). As I also said, the problem was constant with my "old" Fesity installation, where I completelly removed and reinstalled vpnc 0.4 and vpnc 0.3.3 three or four times each (one at a time of course). 0.3. always worked, but 0.4 never did. On 24/09/2007, Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you please attach the result of `vpnc --no-detach --debug 3 > '? > > ** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) > Assignee: (unassigned) => Philipp Kern (pkern) >Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122045 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 122045] Re: "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3
I'm using vpnc 0.4.0-2ubuntu1.1, and it's working fine on my "new" Feisty installation. Back on my "old" Feisty, I had to force synaptic to keep the old repository for 0.3.3. Unfortunately I don't have the old debug output. And according to the IT services of the company, I was the only one having a problem with vpnc.. But Linux it's not their speciality. I'll reply again in a week or two, if I have problems with the upcoming Gutsy distro. Thanks On 24/09/2007, Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, if vpnc 0.4.0 always broke for you, then it's highly likely that > an upgrade to Gutsy (which contains this version) will break your VPN > access. > > It would be nice to see this debug output for all versions in [0.3.3 > (i.e. feisty), 0.4.0-3ubuntu2 (i.e. gutsy), 0.5.1 (vanilla, not in the > archives)]. Problems with vpnc are hard to track because they might > depend on the remote VPN concentrator. > > -- > "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122045 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 93413] Re: vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately
I guess that message was just intended for Lynoure, because I have the problem with the 1.1 package as well (but not with the 0.3.3) On 06/07/07, ih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is fixed in version vpnc-0.4.0-2ubuntu1.1 (notice the .1 at the end) > > Go to Synaptic and check what version is it that you have installed and > what version is available for install. > > Also check your repositories list. > > -- > vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122045] Re: "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3
I am so sorry for the report above. On a clean Feisty installation (same
computer, same server) I was able to connect using vpnc 0.4.0ubuntu1.1 to my
Cisco VPN Server.
I can however garantee that the problem I had before was consistent: 0.4.0-1.1
didn't work but 0.3.3 did. I tried several times, totally removing ("Complete
removal" option on synaptics) everything related to vpnc between different
attempts.
--
"no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 93413] Re: vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately
I am so sorry for the report above. On a clean Feisty installation
(same computer, same server) I was able to connect using vpnc
0.4.0ubuntu1.1 to my Cisco VPN Server.
I can however garantee that the problem I had before (also with
feisty) was consistent: 0.4.0-1.1 didn't work but 0.3.3 did. I tried
several times, totally removing ("Complete removal" option on
synaptics) everything related to vpnc between different attempts.
--
vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93413] Re: vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately
Hate to say but I still get the "no response from target" message with 0.4.0ubuntu1.1 (yes I'm sure it's 1.1 and not 1). Downgraded to 0.3.3 and it is working fine. (then I upgraded back to 0.4.0-1.1 which failed again, and then back to 0.3.3 which worked fine) (sorry, I'm a sort of newbie and couldn't find any log file) -- vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93413] Re: vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately
I was indeed connected with 0.3.3. vpnc said I was connected; During the connection I checked my IP, and it was no longer the one I had before, but the IP from the VPN Server I was connected to; I was able to connect to online services that depend on the vpn connection (intranet for instance); With 0.4.0 I get the "no response" message after 14 or 15 seconds (not 30... possibly a new bug?) after I entered the password -- vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 93413] Re: vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately
Yep, from the command line (sudo vpnc-connect) I dont know if I get the VPN server IP.. just have 15 seconds to check.. Is there any way to check that? -- vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93413] Re: vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately
Uhm, I am behind a firewall, so ifconfig just gives the usual 192.168... I tried a more primitive method: connecting with vpnc during a download. The download rate never decreased (which I guess it would if I were connected to the vpn server). So I guess it is indeed a new bug -- vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93413] Re: vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately
thanks anyway! -- vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122045] "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vpnc With vpnc 0.4.0ubuntu1.1 I get a "no response from target" 15 seconds after introducing the logins and the passwords. However downgrading 0.3.3 solves the problem. I run both from the terminal, kvpnc is not installed. I tried the upgrade and downgrade twice and the results are always the same. I ran a very primitive test (newbie) to check if I got connected to the VPN Server during those 15 seconds: I was monitoring the download rate of a file, and it was constant (apart from usual fluctuations), so I guess I never got connected. I've seen some entries on forums about this, but no bug was reported ** Affects: vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- "no response from target" with 0.4.0(1.1) but not with 0.3.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122045 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 93413] Re: vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately
Sorry, I meant behind a router. I tried my primitive test (downloading while connecting) using 0.3.3 and the download was interrupted immediately after introducing the login. On 25/06/07, TomasHnyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it does not matter if you are behind a firewall, vpn gives you a new IP > address anyway. a new interface called tun or tap is created usually. > > -- > vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 69271] Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery Partition with MSWin
Public bug reported: What happened: - When installing Ubuntu 6.06 from CD, I didn't touch the PQSERVICE partition (FAT32 recovery partition that comes with an Acer laptop, including Windows XP and other Acer Software and drivers). - When returning to Windows XP, the application monitor.exe (that belongs to the AcerRecovery tools) boosts in CPU Usage, so that the system becomes very very slow. (Killing the process is enough to solve the problem) - After checking many forum posts I realized that this is always a symptom of problems of AcerRecovery when trying to access the pqservice partition. (Don't ask why it does it every time you turn windows on) Other important information - I've partitioned my disc before when installing Fedora (more than once) and this didn't happen. - The pqservice partition is apparently ok. Same size, same file system, same name, same place... - I obviously cannot repeat the procedure (would have to buy a new laptop for that), but in all cases I read on the web there were always these points in common: Acer laptop + ubuntu partitioning = problem with monitor.exe accessing pqservice partition - Soon after installing 6.06 I updated to 6.10. I guess this is insignificant because I updated, I didn't reinstall. Anyway I didn't use windows in the mean time, so I can't tell when the problem started. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Ubuntu partitioning procedure (during installation) damages the Acer Recovery Partition with MSWin https://launchpad.net/bugs/69271 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78741] Re: menu.lst was changed during Ubuntu upgrade
Forgot to post this. A month ago, when the kernel was upgraded, the menu.lst was once again changed deleting the reference to windows boot. -- menu.lst was changed during Ubuntu upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/78741 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78741] menu.lst was changed during Ubuntu upgrade
Public bug reported: My last automatic package upgrade in Ubuntu 6.10 changed my menu.lst without any notice. It simply deleted my windows xp boot option. (unfortunately I don't have any backup...) (only found another complaint, also very recent, on Ubuntu Forum :http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=319109&highlight=menu.lst+changed) ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- menu.lst was changed during Ubuntu upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/78741 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78741] Re: menu.lst was changed during Ubuntu upgrade
here's my dpkg.log ** Attachment added: "dpkg.log" http://librarian.launchpad.net/5689611/dpkg.log -- menu.lst was changed during Ubuntu upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/78741 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476360] Re: Never able to connect to facebook
ubuntu1.1 from karmic-proposed here, still not connecting -- Never able to connect to facebook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kopete-facebook in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476360] Re: Never able to connect to facebook
i was rechecking the logs and understood what was happening: for some reason kopete did not update my facebook password that i had changed. i tried to change it again, and still the "no connection" message (not a wrong password one). deleted my facebook account in kopete, kopete asked me twice for the password (as is told in another bug) and then it logged in ok. -- Never able to connect to facebook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kopete-facebook in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476360] Re: Never able to connect to facebook
done some experiments, the same problem (of non-updating the passwords) is happening with other kopete accounts. so it's exclusively a kopete (or kwallet?) problem. anyway, i leave this comment here, there might be more people in my situation -- Never able to connect to facebook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476360 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kopete-facebook in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 549289] Re: [Conexant CX20582 (Pebble)] Playback problem - sound from speakers when headphones plugged in, or both in headphones and speakers
Adding options snd-hda-intel model="olpc-xo-1_5" to alsa-base.conf ALSO solves the problem for Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat -- [Conexant CX20582 (Pebble)] Playback problem - sound from speakers when headphones plugged in, or both in headphones and speakers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 549289] Re: [Conexant CX20582 (Pebble)] Playback problem - sound from speakers when headphones plugged in, or both in headphones and speakers
oops, i take that back about the solution for 10.10RC on thinkpad edge. the audio output seems to stick to the first option: if i turn on the computer with a jack plugged in, then only the external audio will work (irrespective if i unplug it or not). if i turn it on without anything plugged in, only the internal speakers work. (muting works as it should) -- [Conexant CX20582 (Pebble)] Playback problem - sound from speakers when headphones plugged in, or both in headphones and speakers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 547257] Re: nautilus crashed when trying to publish file to ubuntu one
Same thing here with Lucid -- nautilus crashed when trying to publish file to ubuntu one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/547257 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227781] Re: libapache2-mod-mono and libapache2-mod-php are mutually exclusive
Apache proxy is garbage - it removes the !DOCTYPE declaration from html that gets sent through it and this makes browsers switch to "quirks" mode, breaking expected page layout. -- libapache2-mod-mono and libapache2-mod-php are mutually exclusive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227781] Re: libapache2-mod-mono and libapache2-mod-php are mutually exclusive
libapache2-mod-mono: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1.2.5-2 Version table: 1.2.5-2 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status libapache2-mod-php5: Installed: 5.2.4-2ubuntu5 Candidate: 5.2.4-2ubuntu5 Version table: *** 5.2.4-2ubuntu5 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status If mod-php5 is not thread-safe and has to be built against prefork worker, then there should be prefork version of mod-mono too, to make it possible to run both at the same time. -- libapache2-mod-mono and libapache2-mod-php are mutually exclusive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227781] [NEW] libapache2-mod-mono and libapache2-mod-php are mutually exclusive
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libapache2-mod-mono In Ubuntu 8.04, libapache2-mod-mono depends on apache2-mpm-worker, while libapache2-mod-php5 depends on apache2-mpm-prefork, which makes mono and php5 mutually exclusive. I have just upgraded from 7.04, where this was never a problem - I used to run successfully php5 and asp.net 2.0 web servers simultaneously. ** Affects: mod-mono (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libapache2-mod-mono and libapache2-mod-php are mutually exclusive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
