[Bug 982210]
same thing here on Debian 10 Akregator - Version 5.9.3 I completely wiped out my Akregator settings (including ~/.cache/akregator), imported an .opml file. I added a duplicate for one of the feeds, and the "date" showed up as year 2106. I looked again in the the feeds that were set and noticed a feed was a duplicate. I am testing the duplicate rss feed issue with this one, http://planet.kernel.org/rss20.xml The datestamp for the first copy of this feed is correct, but if a copy of this feed is used, all the datestamps for the second feed become 2106 for the year. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982210 Title: Akregator shows 07.02.2106 07:28 in the date section To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdepim/+bug/982210/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1768190] [NEW] prepend domain-name-servers does not parse
Public bug reported: "prepend domain-name-servers ;" in /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf fails on Ubuntu from as early as artful and also tested on bionic the result is that /etc/resolv.conf never shows "nameserver " however on other distributions this works as expected.. (other distributions use an earlier version of 4.3.1) simply append this to the dhclient.conf file, or create a lease section .. it always fails.. perhaps something after 4.3.1 upstream... please take a look thanks. ** Affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768190 Title: prepend domain-name-servers does not parse To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1768190/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1448446] Re: Cannot login into Ubuntu 15.04 after upgrade
It occurs with upgrades but it also occurs on new installs. appears to be a pam setup issue as I notice there are errors with /var/log/auth.log. virtualbox using vivid amd64 I get the same symptom, both users (newly created user upon install and guest account) cannot logon graphically but the main user can login via text console. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448446 Title: Cannot login into Ubuntu 15.04 after upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1448446/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1452390] [NEW] invalid pam rule in vivid is preventing logins
Public bug reported: there are problematic pam rules preventing users from logging in (pam errors show up with auth.log) Other users are reporting this problem online with upgrades but I can confirm this occurs with just new installs in Virtualbox (15.04 amd64) please have a look thanks ** Affects: pam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452390 Title: invalid pam rule in vivid is preventing logins To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1452390/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1448446] Re: Cannot login into Ubuntu 15.04 after upgrade
ignore my previous post, discovered the problem is addressed to something else -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448446 Title: Cannot login into Ubuntu 15.04 after upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1448446/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1452390] Re: invalid pam rule in vivid is preventing logins
please close this report as the issue is more prevalent to something else thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452390 Title: invalid pam rule in vivid is preventing logins To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1452390/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1446760] Re: sddm and lightdm can run at the same time
also occurs with a clean install of the UbuntuGnome iso installation If one does apt-get install kubuntu-desktop, there is a dpkg-reconfigure for the display manager (which shows both selections: gdm and sddm) gdm was chosen but it doesn't disable sddm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446760 Title: sddm and lightdm can run at the same time To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sddm/+bug/1446760/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1260972] Re: Montreal not available in Ubiquity time zome selector
affects many distro installers (i've noticed) However in the case here Montreal is not visually selectable, but is text-selectable via the pulldown ... but yet again choosing the text pulldown does not activate the 'Continue' button of the installer.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/1262458 (video shows where in the installer, for clarity) It's more than one city that's problematic The bug prevents from continuing the install the following excerpt was relating that the previous installer editions was working (as on Mint 15 and Mint 14 installers, but not Mint 16) " Cannot select Montreal in order to Continue installation In more detail, I "can" text-select from a matching pulldown (typing Mont, which eventually shows something like Mont-real ). .. When the text item is selected from the pulldown, it visibly gets autocompleted in the textbox, however the 'Continue' button is still inactive. Also the city Montreal and some others are not selectable from point-and-clicking on the visual map.. Other cities are selectable in Canada..(I'm guessing this may be a problem for other places) This wasn't occurring with the v15 or 14 installer, so something got rolled into the latest causing it.. thanks.. (It may look a little difficult to properly select a city on the visual map, but it's the first time this isn't working jumps to offset showing problem http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4su9nrGbD4#t=1m41s version 16 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4U6rZrS7qE#t=55s v15 ) " -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1260972 Title: Montreal not available in Ubiquity time zome selector To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1260972/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1131336] [NEW] simple bugs
Public bug reported: not many bugs, but they hinder from proper use eg: fc << strangely this bash built-in is opening le "type " (type is a built-in bash command to determine things variable/function things) " westlake@ubuntu:~$ type fc fc is a shell builtin westlake@ubuntu:~$ type le le is hashed (/usr/bin/le) westlake@ubuntu:~$ which -a le /usr/bin/le " ** Affects: le (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131336 Title: simple bugs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/le/+bug/1131336/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1131336] Re: simple bugs
Noticed le-1.14.8.tar.bz2 is available from its homesite ftp://ftp.yar.ru/pub/source/le/binaries/ the one currently on quantal is.. "le --version le - Text editor LE version 1.14.3 Copyright (C) 1993-2008 by Alexander V. Lukyanov " Is this package being dropped from ubuntu? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131336 Title: simple bugs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/le/+bug/1131336/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162418] [NEW] -vf option question/bug?
Public bug reported: Hi, This package/program is great.. Works great for making usb images and I know there's null other bugs about it.. but alot of people don't know this program is very useful.. It has a percentage indicator for making Usb Linux installers (dumping iso images to usb devices).. and there's now an increase of Hybrid iso images coming out.. Having desperately looking for a substitute for cat/dd I came upon this tool.. It's actually imho something that should be getting more attention.. This application is very stable, but I think I hit a bug, which I think can be very helpful for resolving (despite the fact it's not widely known about, I'm telling others about it) perhaps it can be more of an operational question but it doesn't seem to be because there is old circa examples from ~2005 to compare the success of using -vf very asimilar to the command of (2) as indicated below The command is stable, but when used in form for verifying a dumped image on usb, is when the command fails eg: dcfldd if=image.iso of=[USB DEV] bs=1M (1) no problems dcfldd if=/dev/sdz vf=image.iso (2)does not pass " 0 - 0: Mismatch Total: Mismatch " If I perform dcfldd if=1.dd vf=2.dd (these are two simple clone files of anything) the command works perfectly as expected.. but I have seen online (circa ~2005, when the author of this tool was more active) of examples using a device with an image file.. as of form (2).. Instead of using (2) , I'm using as a workaround to verify the checksum of the usb device (length of the iso image) dcfldd if=/dev/sdz of=/dev/null hashwindow=[SIZE in bytes OF ISO FILE] bs=8M count=[calccount] hashformat="#window_start# to #window_end#: My md5 is #hash#" hash=md5 status=off The [calccount] is an integer that was calculated as #bytes_of_iso/8M , and then rounded up once to the next whole number an example output of a real command session " dcfldd if=/dev/sdi of=/dev/null hashwindow=3999268864 bs=8M count=477 hashformat="#window_start# to #window_end# bytes: My md5 is #hash#" hash=md5 status=off 0 to 3999268864 bytes: My md5 is abb8f9ed08814ae1f8afccfc8d79db5d 3999268864 to 4001366016 bytes: My md5 is 4caf481e99bd7937041595c8da2840bd Total (md5): 5c87be1c675d7960474ecf30bd366edf " (status=off was used to disable the default statusinterval message, it's optional, and it would say if status=on for the first line "256 blocks (2048Mb) written.0 to 3999268864 bytes: My md5 is abb8f9ed08814ae1f8afccfc8d79db5d" which looks a bit confusing, but nothing is really written to, having of=/dev/null ) "abb8f9ed08814ae1f8afccfc8d79db5d" is the md5 checksum of the Mageia3-beta iso-- so I know the dump was fully succesful This tool is great.. with the increase of hybrid ISO'z I was looking for an easy tool to use to dump iso images while showing a progress %.. This tool also offers much more than dd, cat(such as dumping to multiple devices, more than one of= can be used) and I will be telling other document maintainers to consider including this tool for dumping ISO'z .. It would be great if a command such as dcfldd if=[USB DEVICE] vf=[image iso] would work because it's much simpler to type.. I also tried vice-versa (vf=[image iso of=[USB DEVICE]), but to no avail.. When the command with -vf works, the output is very simple saying "Total: Match" I know the original author is no longer around taking care of this program.. and I believe this program isn't a very complex one, you may also forward this to a Debian maintainer if this is the case.. Thank you for your support, would like to know what it can be that's wrong with the vf option as it would really simplify things :) ** Affects: dcfldd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162418 Title: -vf option question/bug? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dcfldd/+bug/1162418/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1131336] Re: simple bugs
thanks, but someone a bit back pointed to me that this isnt a bug hehehe On 13-03-14 03:11 AM, LocutusOfBorg wrote: > Yes, contacting the mantainer will likely fix this bug. > BTW this kind of bugs I think should be reported upstream. > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1131336 Title: simple bugs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/le/+bug/1131336/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
