[Bug 574436] [NEW] Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Steps to reproduce: 1. Install opera via a .deb package downloaded from www.opera.com or snapshots.opera.com 2. Upgrade Ubuntu from 9.10 to 10.04 Expected result: Opera is installed and available to use. Actual result: Opera is marked as obsolete and uninstalled Notes: It would seem that the Opera repository (http://deb.opera.com/) is disabled within "/etc/apt/sources.list.d/opera.list" on upgrade. During the final updrage step Opera is then interpreted as being obsolete, due to the fact that it was listed in the APT sources and is no longer. As such it is actually uninstalled, thus leaving an Opera user without his/her favoured browser. Although I have not yet investigated further I would guess that all software provided exclusively by third party repositories will get similarly removed in this way. I suspect it is highly unlikely this is what a user would want or expect. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.134.7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon May 3 14:21:47 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574436] Re: Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47537832/Dependencies.txt -- Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574436] Re: Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade
** Attachment added: "third-party-sources.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47546382/third-party-sources.png -- Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574436] Re: Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade
** Attachment added: "opera-removed-on-upgrade.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47546408/opera-removed-on-upgrade.png -- Third party software is uninstalled on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 489863] Re: When Opera is running then Ubuntu freezes down.
See: http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=336001 @Dan: The F1 (from your ctrl-alt-F1 to switch to your first virtual console) is being picked up by Gnome, after you kill Opera. -- When Opera is running then Ubuntu freezes down. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 489863] Re: When Opera is running then Ubuntu freezes down.
It is a bug in Opera and needs to be fixed in Opera. It could happen on any distro. :( ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Invalid -- When Opera is running then Ubuntu freezes down. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858246] Re: Software center cannot install opera deb file: Internal Error
The problem is that the data.tar file within the Opera Debian package is lzma compressed. Since /usr/bin/lzma is not present on Ubuntu "Oneiric Ocelot" 11.10, Software Center cannot open the file. However, other utilities such as dpkg and apt can open the package and install it without any issue because they use /usr/bin/xz to open lzma compressed files. Indeed if you create /usr/bin/lzma as a symlink to /usr/bin/xz then software center can open the Opera package as well. This can be fixed in two ways, either the /usr/bin/lzma symlink should be provided by the xz package for backwards compatibility (in fact that is good idea anyway as xz is just a continuation of lzma and other distros do this) and/or Software Center should be updated to use xz when lzma is not present. http://my.opera.com/community/forums/findpost.pl?id=10564932 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858246 Title: Software center cannot install opera deb file: Internal Error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/858246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"
You might want to merge this and the bug logged for opera 858246 as they are the same underlying issue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 Title: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/868188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"
Will a Recommends lzma be enough to actually install it without any user interaction? Is the default in Ubuntu now to install Recommends by default? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 Title: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/868188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875767] Re: Software center doesn't allow to install Opera browser
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 868188 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 858246 Software center cannot install opera deb file: Internal Error ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 868188 "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875767 Title: Software center doesn't allow to install Opera browser To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/875767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872556] Re: Failed to install Opera 11.51 in Oneiric
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 868188 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 858246 Software center cannot install opera deb file: Internal Error ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 868188 "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872556 Title: Failed to install Opera 11.51 in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/872556/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 858246] Re: Software center cannot install opera deb file: Internal Error
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 868188 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 868188 "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858246 Title: Software center cannot install opera deb file: Internal Error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/858246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 854164] Re: Internal Error: deb file could not be opened.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 868188 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 868188 "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854164 Title: Internal Error: deb file could not be opened. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/854164/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 869685] Re: Always fails to install 3rd party debs
Try this: ar t /home/rogerb/Downloads/google-musicmanager-beta_current_amd64.deb Is the data.tar inside lzma compressed? If yes then this is a dupe of 868188. You can work around it in one of three ways 1. Installing with dpkg 2. Installing either the lzma or xz-lzma packages as they provide /usr/bin/lmza 3. setting up your own symlink such that /usr/bin/lmza points to /usr/bin/xz Remember to mark this as a duplicate if it is your issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869685 Title: Always fails to install 3rd party debs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/869685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 869685] Re: Always fails to install 3rd party debs
see also: http://my.opera.com/community/forums/findpost.pl?id=10564932 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869685 Title: Always fails to install 3rd party debs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/869685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"
Just a quick comment. When testing don't use an Opera package to verify as we updated our stable packages to use bzip2 compression in the mean time, whilst we await this fix making its way down to regular users. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 Title: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/868188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"
Ok, I may be doing something wrong or misunderstanding something and if so please point it out to me but this fix doesn't seem to work for me. I enabled oneiric-proposed via "Ubuntu Software Center→Edit→Software Sources→Updates". Then I ran Update Manager, which found found an update to Software Center (amongst other things). I then installed all updates. After this was finished I was still unable to install an lzma compressed deb and I notice that the lzma package is not installed. P.S. Surely the best way to fix this would not be to add any more dependencies to Software Center (which bloats the system) but rather to have Software Center use xz to read lzma compressed data if lzma is not available. This is what other utilities like tar and dpkg do, which explains why people could work around this issue by installing via the command line and did not need to install lzma to get this to work with dpkg. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 Title: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/868188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"
Ok, worked this out. My /etc/apt/sources.list contained: deb http://no.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-proposed restricted main multiverse universe I changed this to: deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-proposed restricted main multiverse universe and I got further updates. This time with lzma. ;) So it seems the Norwegian mirror was just a little behind. So, yes the fix works for me as well! :) Sorry for the confusion. P.S. I still think having Software Center use xz to open lzma compressed data would be neater but at least the current solution fixes the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 Title: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/868188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868188] Re: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened"
One more comment (hope people are not getting bored of me). If you do want to go down the dependency route, you could have the recommend be the xz-lzma package rather than the lzma package. The difference being that xz-lzma does not include any new binaries itself but rather is a set of symlinks pointing to the xz binaries. Wereas the lzma package installs the older lzma utils, which are no longer actively maintained (note: the upstream maintainer of lzma utils is the same as xz utils. He considers xz to be the replacement for lzma, which is why it is backwards compatible in the first place). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868188 Title: "Internal Error ...google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb could not be opened" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/868188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048577] Re: Opera Web Browser's fails tabs on Ubuntu 12.10
Hi, I work for Opera. We did a minor update today for Opera verison 12.02 (build 1629) which includes a fix http://my.opera.com/ruario/blog/2012/10/02/problems- running-12-10-on-12-10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048577 Title: Opera Web Browser's fails tabs on Ubuntu 12.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1048577/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 933888] Re: add /etc/os-release file
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 947236 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947236 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 947236 Please provide /etc/os-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933888 Title: add /etc/os-release file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/933888/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947236] Re: Please provide /etc/os-release
F.Y.I The file is already present in recent versions of the following distros: Angstrom, ArchLinux, Debian (sid), Fedora, Frugalware, OpenSUSE, Fedora, Mageia (and possibly others), so Ubuntu is a little behind on this one. Will this be fixed in time for Quantal? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947236 Title: Please provide /etc/os-release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/947236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947236] Re: Please provide /etc/os-release
Not sure why I listed Fedora, twice. That was a mistake! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947236 Title: Please provide /etc/os-release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/947236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947236] Re: Please provide /etc/os-release
> We'll basically get this for free the next time we merge base-files from Debian. You will get the file for free but it will still need adjusting to have Ubuntu specific information. As a side note, in addition to the distros I listed earlier I noticed that Gentoo also added this 3 months back: http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/baselayout/trunk/etc.Linux/os-release?view=log&pathrev=3203 Also Slackware have just added this to their development version, so the next Slackware version (14. 0, which is currently at RC3), will include it as well: http://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/source/a/aaa_base/os-release Quantal will be the odd one out, since most of the well known distros already have this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947236 Title: Please provide /etc/os-release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/947236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 873545] Re: After update Nautilus icons are black/white, no decorations of breadcrumb etc.
http://my.opera.com/ruario/blog/2011/12/02/styling-lost-opera-shutdown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873545 Title: After update Nautilus icons are black/white, no decorations of breadcrumb etc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/873545/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879793] Re: No GTK theme applied on login, should be Ambiance
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 873545 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873545 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 873545 After update Nautilus icons are black/white, no decorations of breadcrumb etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879793 Title: No GTK theme applied on login, should be Ambiance To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/879793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877143] Re: Missing icons and broken theme after updating to 11.10
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 873545 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873545 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 879793 No GTK theme applied on login, should be Ambiance ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 873545 After update Nautilus icons are black/white, no decorations of breadcrumb etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877143 Title: Missing icons and broken theme after updating to 11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-session/+bug/877143/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673127] [NEW] The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: 1. Make a directory called /tmp/testdirectory 2. Start Firefox and enable the Gtk file selector for downloads, i.e. "Edit > Preferences > General > Download" and click "Always as me where to save files" 3. Navigate to a page where a file is available for download 4. Attempt to save this file as /tmp/testdirectory Expected result: The file is not saved. Actually result: The directory /tmp/testdirectory (and any contents) are overwritten and silently replaced with the file. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: libgtk2.0-0 2.22.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.34-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Nov 9 18:36:16 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gtk+2.0 ** Affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick -- The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673127] Re: The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories
-- The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673127] Re: The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories
It should be noted that it is not only Firefox. Other apps that use the Gtk file selector can do the same. For example I can also reproduce with Opera. It is also worth noting that if you run Opera under KDE, Opera will use the KDE file selector instead. Under these conditions Opera switches into the directory rather than overwriting the directory with a file. Hence why I interpret this as a bug with the Gtk file selector itself. -- The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673127] Re: The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories
> Under these conditions Opera switches into the directory rather than overwriting the directory with a file. correction: Under these conditions the "KDE file selector" switches into the directory rather than overwriting the directory with a file. -- The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673127] Re: The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories
You can also do the same in Epiphany once you set "Edit > Preferences > General" and uncheck "Automatically download and open files" -- The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673127] Re: The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories
Pedro really? Testing in Firefox or Epiphany? -- The Gtk file selector can silently overwite directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594791] Re: openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori
> > 3. libsqlite is not packaged correctly either. > > > is there more reason/evidence than the claim? >From my original comment, the fact that I need to do this: $ sudo ln -s /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so.0 /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so -- openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594791] Re: openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori
> No, what you are doing is plain wrong. if the symlink is needed, install the libsqlite0-dev package. but in the first place the browser you are using is wrong and should not rely on using the .so symlink. Please file a bug report for the browser. Actually you have just misunderstood me. I *never* said that Opera needed that symlink. icedtea6-plugin needs or perhaps needed (following this update which I have yet to test) that symlink. Basically I ran 'ldd /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/IcedTeaPlugin.so' noted two 'not found' entries (libxul.so and libxpcom.so), setup symlinks and ran ldd again, got new 'not found' entries, symlinked those and so on, untill all the dependencies of 'IcedTeaPlugin.so' where satisfied. One of the symlinks *for IcedTeaPlugin.so* was '/usr/lib/libsqlite3.so.0'. This may be fixed now and if so then great but it was never a (chrome, midori or opera) browser issue. With the symlinks in place all browsers worked. I'll try to test soon. The only reason I have not yet is that Ubuntu is not my primary distro. P.S. Thanks for getting this fixed. -- openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594791] Re: openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori
Ok, for the record, I removed my workaround and updated my Ubuntu install. ldd'ing IcedTeaPlugin.so now results in no 'not found' lines and all of the installed browsers work with Java without any extra configuration. So yes, this is fixed for me as well. -- openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594791] Re: openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori
I have exactly the same problem with Opera 10.60 Beta (the IcedTea plugin not working) and there seems to be three problems here: 1. The IcedTea plugin depends on some Mozilla components, meaning that you won't have a working Java plugin without these installed, which makes little sense if you don't intend to use Firefox as your browser. 2. The way that the packaging is setup even if you have the 'correct' packages installed your other browsers won't find the libs that they need because they are buried in Firefox and/or xulrunner sub directories. 3. libsqlite is not packaged correctly either. This is a major issue for anyone running a browser other than FF on Lucid who wants working Java since Sun/Oracle's Java was removed from all of the Lucid repositories. From my personal perspective Java plugin support is broken in Lucid. :( --- rua...@lucid-desktop:~$ sudo apt-get install icedtea6-plugin [snip icedtea6-plugin install] rua...@lucid-desktop:~$ ldd /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/i386/IcedTeaPlugin.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0x006a7000) libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x00d15000) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x0011) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x009cf000) libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x00bd7000) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0x004e5000) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0x0050c000) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0x0065a000) libcairo.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0x00526000) libgio-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0 (0x005a) libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x006a8000) libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x006eb000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x00c3b000) libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x00877000) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x00af1000) libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0x0063e000) librt.so.1 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/librt.so.1 (0x00ba1000) libxul.so => not found libxpcom.so => not found libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so (0x00644000) libplc4.so => /usr/lib/libplc4.so (0x00648000) libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/libnspr4.so (0x00a89000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0x00666000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0x00a7a000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x008b6000) libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0x0082d000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0067f000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x00e5b000) libpcre.so.3 => /lib/libpcre.so.3 (0x00761000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x00792000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x0064d000) libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x0069e000) libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x00ae) libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x007a2000) libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x007aa000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x00fb5000) libXcomposite.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 (0x006a2000) libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXdamage.so.1 (0x007b4000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x007b8000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x007be000) libpixman-1.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpixman-1.so.0 (0x00af6000) libdirectfb-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libdirectfb-1.2.so.0 (0x00c6b000) libfusion-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libfusion-1.2.so.0 (0x0080c000) libdirect-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libdirect-1.2.so.0 (0x00816000) libpng12.so.0 => /lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x00b5) libxcb-render-util.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render-util.so.0 (0x007d3000) libxcb-render.so.0 => /usr/lib/libxcb-render.so.0 (0x00853000) libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0x0085b000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libresolv.so.2 (0x009ac000) libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x00abe000) libexpat.so.1 => /lib/libexpat.so.1 (0x00b75000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00e3e000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x007d8000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x009c) --- Give the 'not found' lines, the above would make you wonder how Firefox is able to run the plugin. The answer is that they have the needed libs in their own lib directories. Directories that the likes of Opera and Chrome are obviously not scanning and preloading libs from. On my own system I quickly did the following: --- rua...@lucid-desktop:~$ sudo ln -s /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.3/libxpcom.so /usr/lib/libxpcom.so rua...@lucid-desktop:~$ sudo ln -s /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.3/libmozjs.so /usr/lib/libmozjs.so rua...@lucid-desktop:~$ sudo ln -s /
[Bug 594791] Re: openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori
Ok, it seems from this blog post that you can add Oracle Java from Lucid repository: http://www.chromedocs.net/2010/06/or-how-i-learned-to-stop-reading- bug.html However, I still think that many new and less experienced users will be very confused by this and wrongly interpret as some failing of Opera and Chrome. -- openjdk and icedtea plugin won't run on chromium, chrome and midori https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
