[Bug 335803] Re: qt applications have render update delay in gnome when compiz is enabled
I can confirm this bug on a Dell Latitude D630 with the proprietary Nvidia driver on Ubuntu 9.04 "Jaunty". In Gnome with visual effects enabled, Qt applications like KeePassX or the git client cola do not update their windows correctly and basically become unusable. If I disable visual effects in Gnome, each Qt application behaves correctly. -- qt applications have render update delay in gnome when compiz is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 416981] [NEW] coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: coreutils Running 'du -hs ' returns a radically different size summary as displayed in the folder properties of Nautilus in Gnome. The folder I am trying with is displayed as follows in Nautilus: 2,966 items, totalling 54.0 MB du(1) 'du -hs directory' shows: 4.1Mdirectory/ I am running Ubuntu 9.04 64bit on a Dell Latitude D630, all updates installed. ** Affects: coreutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: coreutils du -- coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 416981] Re: coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly
This is certainly weird. Without any changes to the folder in question, 'du -hs' now reports a size of 75M. The result for 'du -hsL' is the same. The folder or any content within hasn't been touched since I reported the bug. The only thing that occurred in between were system restarts and a kernel update (latest Ubuntu updates). Any idea? -- coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 416981] Re: coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly
I checked what Nautilus says about the size of the folder and it still says by its original output: "2,966 items, totalling 54.0 MB" So even if du now shows more than just 4MB, more than 70MB are still off the mark. Something is very wrong here. -- coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 416981] Re: coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly
1. what type of filesystem is this? Information from 'mount -v': ... /dev/sda12 on /home type ext3 (rw,relatime) ... /home/username/.Private on /home/username type ecryptfs (ecryptfs_sig=60cc62a1039711h8,ecryptfs_fnek_sig=3257a12b81aff999,ecryptfs_cipher=aes,ecryptfs_key_bytes=16) So, it's an encrypted home directory on an ext3 partition. It might be ecryptfs related maybe? 2. is it local or remote? local 3. does it happen on other directories/FSs? Yes, most certainly! I pulled three projects from a Perforce server, all seem to report the wrong size with 'du -hsL'. In some cases, the difference is factor 2! 4. can you copy it to another place, and test again? I guess you assume to copy it to a non-ecryptfs filesystem. Sure thing. Result: Original folder now shows 59M copied to /home (local ext3), Nautilus shows 54M on ecryptfs and on ext3. So it's closer, but not identical. -- coreutils: du(1) doesn't summarize correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 810093] Re: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable
I am really looking forward to a fix. The Samsung N130 netbook is not really useable right now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810093 Title: The new (2.6.39+) samsung_laptop kernel module causes serious backlight flickering - makes the desktop unusable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/810093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
