[Bug 273075] Re: MP4Box buffer overflow detected
+1 broken on intrepid 64-bit server replaced with libgpac0.4.4_0.4.4-0.3ubuntu1~gutsy1_amd64.deb works properly now. please update/fix ASAP! -- MP4Box buffer overflow detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273075] Re: MP4Box buffer overflow detected
+1 broken on intrepid 64-bit server replaced with libgpac0.4.4_0.4.4-0.3ubuntu1~gutsy1_amd64.deb works properly now. please update/fix ASAP! -- MP4Box buffer overflow detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 214041] Re: NFS mounting hangs instead of returning with permission denied
I am having an issue I do not know if this is related, but I have a server that uses NFS lightly, it has just broken now after an upgrade to intrepid. I have 6 client machines to a FreeBSD NFS server running NFS v3 over TCP. After an hour or two, NFS just starts hanging and cannot recover. I can umount -l /home, but it will never let me remount. Can't find anything in the client or server logs that is relevant as to why. My dpkg list is identical on all 6 servers, all the configs I compared are identical too (well besides for server specific info) so I don't know what could be the reason why only 1 of the 6 seems to be having the issue. I downgraded the kernel from linux-image-2.6.27-10-server to linux-image-2.6.27-7-server, still doesn't matter. I'll pay someone to figure this out ASAP. This is wrecking my hosting business right now... mike503 AT gmail.com -- NFS mounting hangs instead of returning with permission denied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 389722] [NEW] skip-name-resolve is not included in default my.cnf
Public bug reported: (note: mtaylor told me to submit this as a bug) "skip-name-resolve" is not included in /etc/mysql/my.cnf, and probably should be. ** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- skip-name-resolve is not included in default my.cnf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389722 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273075] Re: MP4Box buffer overflow detected
Not afaik. I'm still waiting. I have a custom compiled gpac 0.4.5-1 and it works fine against the ubuntu libraries, but I had to compile the gpac (mp4box) myself. It seems to have fixed it. libgpac-dev 0.4.4-0.3ubuntu4 libgpac0.4.40.4.4-0.3ubuntu4 my-gpac0.4.5-1 Can this package's sponsors please push a newer version of the entire thing out? -- MP4Box buffer overflow detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273075] Re: MP4Box buffer overflow detected
I don't understand what xmlrpc has to do with gpac... at least the gpac package, maybe the gpac libs need it, but that's quite odd. Sounds like the xmlrpc bug has a fix already for it, so why can't we get both of them pushed through? -- MP4Box buffer overflow detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112937] Re: vmware server will not connect remotely
Does not work using VMware server 1.0.9 downloaded from vmware directly. It compiles, using the vmware-any-any-update or vmware-update for the kernel and such. However, remote connectivity still triggers the PAM errors. I have tried on both 9.04 and 8.10 Ubuntu 64-bit, roughly the same message on both. I can resolve the pam_unix2.so not being found but it still is messed up. What is odd is it seems to be looking for @include even though I've commented it out in all the various pam files that it is referenced in, so I do not know where it is inheriting this from! May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/vmware/lib/libpam.so.0/security/pam_unix2.so) May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM [error: /usr/lib/vmware/lib/libpam.so.0/security/pam_unix2.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory] May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM adding faulty module: /usr/lib/vmware/lib/libpam.so.0/security/pam_unix2.so May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM (other) illegal module type: @include May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-auth] May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM (other) no module name supplied May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM unable to dlopen(<*unknown module path*>) May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM [error: <*unknown module path*>: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory] May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM adding faulty module: <*unknown module path*> May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM (other) illegal module type: @include May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-account] May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM (other) no module name supplied May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM (other) illegal module type: @include May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-password] May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM (other) no module name supplied May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM (other) illegal module type: @include May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM pam_parse: expecting return value; [...common-session] May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: PAM (other) no module name supplied May 29 09:40:53 orisnvm02 vmware-authd[24120]: pam_unix_auth(vmware-authd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty= ruser= rhost= user=root -- vmware server will not connect remotely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112937] Re: vmware server will not connect remotely
I will say this I tried 9.04, could not get it to work. Same with 8.10. However, I did 8.04.2, and it worked, out of the box, without even requiring the vmware patch / vmware-update-update thingy. I can connect remotely to it too, without tweaking pam at all even. This is vmware server 1.0.9 downloaded from vmware.com, not using any packages. Fresh Ubuntu 8.04 x64 box, with only this ran: apt-get build-essential libpam-modules ia32-libs xinetd (and all the dependencies) If only we could get the -current- version of Ubuntu to behave, now. -- vmware server will not connect remotely https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368895] Re: gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04
Actually, can you give us the download location of the .deb? Sorry, I don't know where to find it. I will at least diff it, see if I am comfortable doing it, and possibly try it out. -- gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368895] Re: gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04
Please someone check this out! I would try, but my gitosis repository is actually -extremely- important, and if I try this out on production I would be raked over hot coals (and I have no development setup to try this on) It should be a -very- simple fix to test. -- gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368895] Re: gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04
Here is the debianb ug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508469 And yes - changing the shebang to force python2.5 fixes this, thank god. This should be marked as CRITICAL as out of the box gitosis is broken on jaunty now. I am not sure if the fix to the debian package will resolve this or not, but please, can someone grab it and get it into the ubuntu repos? ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #508469 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508469 -- gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368895] Re: gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04
Here is the debian bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508469 And yes - changing the shebang to force python2.5 fixes this, thank god. This should be marked as CRITICAL as out of the box gitosis is broken on jaunty now. I am not sure if the fix to the debian package will resolve this or not, but please, can someone grab it and get it into the ubuntu repos? -- gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368895] Re: gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04
alright. then how do we push the priority on this to be officially in the ubuntu repo? -- gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273075] Re: MP4Box buffer overflow detected
I don't want to be rude but there is a workaround out there. Is it that hard to get it fixed and in the repo? I'd do it myself if these packages weren't such a pain and I had access. Right now I'm stuck in limbo having to hold back certain packages and having to compile some on my own... I wish there was a full-on this-package-includes-everything with ffmpeg, mp4box, gpac, all that - with all compile options enabled. -- MP4Box buffer overflow detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306016] Re: nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade
This has been an issue for me for a long time using intrepid too. I have not upgraded to jaunty yet. Kernel versions on only *one* machine seem to not start nlockmgr. broken machine: [r...@lvs01 etc]# rpcinfo -p program vers proto port 102 tcp111 portmapper 1000241 udp 64054 status 1000241 tcp 49410 status 102 udp111 portmapper good machine: [r...@web02 default]# rpcinfo -p program vers proto port 102 tcp111 portmapper 102 udp111 portmapper 1000241 udp 26775 status 1000241 tcp 20961 status 1000211 tcp 17290 nlockmgr 1000213 tcp 17290 nlockmgr 1000214 tcp 17290 nlockmgr same identical configs in /etc that matter, same everything. only one machine out of 6 exhibited this behavior. looks like adding "nolock" fixed this. but i was hoping the 2.6.28 update in intrepid would fix it and it still hasn't. the last stable kernel i had was 2.6.24-16-server. since then every kernel has had this issue just on this one box (all identically configured, identical dpkg lists even - i dpkg -l and md5 them and i keep them identical...) PLEASE have this fixed asap and if possible push it back to intrepid until jaunty becomes the new production. -- nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306016] Re: nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade
This has been an issue for me for a long time using intrepid too. I have not upgraded to jaunty yet. Kernel versions on only *one* machine seem to not start nlockmgr. broken machine: [r...@lvs01 etc]# rpcinfo -p program vers proto port 102 tcp111 portmapper 1000241 udp 64054 status 1000241 tcp 49410 status 102 udp111 portmapper good machine: [r...@web02 default]# rpcinfo -p program vers proto port 102 tcp111 portmapper 102 udp111 portmapper 1000241 udp 26775 status 1000241 tcp 20961 status 1000211 tcp 17290 nlockmgr 1000213 tcp 17290 nlockmgr 1000214 tcp 17290 nlockmgr same identical configs in /etc that matter, same everything. only one machine out of 6 exhibited this behavior. looks like adding "nolock" fixed this. but i was hoping the 2.6.28 update in intrepid would fix it and it still hasn't. the last stable kernel i had was 2.6.24-16-server. since then every kernel has had this issue just on this one box (all identically configured, identical dpkg lists even - i dpkg -l and md5 them and i keep them identical...) PLEASE have this fixed asap and if possible push it back to intrepid until jaunty becomes the new production. -- nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306016] Re: nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade
This has been an issue for me for a long time using intrepid too. I have not upgraded to jaunty yet. Kernel versions on only *one* machine seem to not start nlockmgr. broken machine: [r...@lvs01 etc]# rpcinfo -p program vers proto port 102 tcp111 portmapper 1000241 udp 64054 status 1000241 tcp 49410 status 102 udp111 portmapper good machine: [r...@web02 default]# rpcinfo -p program vers proto port 102 tcp111 portmapper 102 udp111 portmapper 1000241 udp 26775 status 1000241 tcp 20961 status 1000211 tcp 17290 nlockmgr 1000213 tcp 17290 nlockmgr 1000214 tcp 17290 nlockmgr same identical configs in /etc that matter, same everything. only one machine out of 6 exhibited this behavior. looks like adding "nolock" fixed this. but i was hoping the 2.6.28 update in intrepid would fix it and it still hasn't. the last stable kernel i had was 2.6.24-16-server. since then every kernel has had this issue just on this one box (all identically configured, identical dpkg lists even - i dpkg -l and md5 them and i keep them identical...) PLEASE have this fixed asap and if possible push it back to intrepid until jaunty becomes the new production. -- nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306016] Re: nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade
I'm using the latest Intrepid packages of everything. NFS seems to work great on everything but one box and one box only, still. Using the "nolock" mount flag workaround appeared to fix it at first, but wound up freezing up again after a while. I had to go back to using 2.6.24-16-server on that one machine and it's okay. Any of the newer kernels don't work. I have not tried Jaunty kernels yet. I did try linux- image-2.6.28-2-server_2.6.28-2.3_amd64.deb which might be one of the earlier jaunty ones a few months ago with no luck either. Same fstab, same /etc/default config files, same dpkg list (identical md5 hashes), same mount strings, same network settings, etc. Odd that I can't get a newer kernel on this one single machine to work. I'm hoping when Jaunty becomes stable I can upgrade everything and be okay. -- nfs client broken since 2.6.28-2-generic upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 368895] Re: gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04
Jorge: that bug is marked as fixed, and the only bug that I can tell from the gitosis package in 9.04 is the shebang. Changing that by itself manually has everything working properly still. According to all the other notes the Debian package works great too, not sure why it can't be promoted/etc -- gitosis not working after upgrade to 9.04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220092] [NEW] Collectd using a lot of CPU?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: collectd On all my machines it seems to be using a TON of cpu, which in turn actually makes it somewhat useless for monitoring :) root 5110 50.4 0.0 300960 2092 ?Sl 13:31 188:36 collectd -C /etc/collectd/collectd.conf -f These are quad-core xeon 3220 machines. I started noticing this definately after upgrading to Hardy. Using Ubuntu standard 2.6.24-16-server SMP kernel, collectd version 4.3.0-1, everything up to date against hardy sources.list. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04 Release:8.04 ** Affects: collectd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Collectd using tons of resources + Collectd using a lot of CPU? -- Collectd using a lot of CPU? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220092] Re: Collectd using a lot of CPU?
i noticed my load was over 1.0 - which is odd. this machine shouldn't be showing much load. i realized collectd was running on this one. 18:30:55 up 7:54, 2 users, load average: 1.07, 0.89, 0.78 killall -9 collectd 18:31:46 up 7:55, 2 users, load average: 1.05, 0.92, 0.79 18:33:10 up 7:56, 2 users, load average: 0.76, 0.86, 0.78 18:33:36 up 7:57, 2 users, load average: 0.63, 0.82, 0.77 18:33:55 up 7:57, 2 users, load average: 0.59, 0.80, 0.77 Apr 21 18:31:15 web03 collectdmon[4618]: Warning: collectd was terminated by signal 9 Apr 21 18:31:15 web03 collectdmon[4618]: Warning: restarting collectd collectd starts up again (i didn't notice it had collectdmon!) - load goes up again: 18:34:40 up 7:58, 2 users, load average: 1.04, 0.88, 0.79 killall -9 collectd collectdmon 18:36:34 up 8:00, 2 users, load average: 0.82, 0.84, 0.79 18:36:39 up 8:00, 2 users, load average: 0.76, 0.83, 0.78 18:36:44 up 8:00, 2 users, load average: 0.70, 0.81, 0.78 18:37:04 up 8:00, 2 users, load average: 0.57, 0.78, 0.77 18:37:31 up 8:01, 2 users, load average: 0.44, 0.73, 0.75 18:37:37 up 8:01, 2 users, load average: 0.40, 0.72, 0.75 18:37:46 up 8:01, 2 users, load average: 0.34, 0.69, 0.74 18:37:55 up 8:01, 2 users, load average: 0.29, 0.67, 0.73 18:43:43 up 8:07, 2 users, load average: 0.23, 0.37, 0.56 <- this is roughly normal Using kernel 2.6.22-19-server now, and still an issue. Only exotic thing here might be that I am mounting /home using iscsi+ocfs2 -- Collectd using a lot of CPU? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220092] Re: Collectd using a lot of CPU?
It should just be a standard Ubuntu collectd.conf... and no, it's only reporting for the host its running on. [EMAIL PROTECTED] nginx]# grep -v ^# /etc/collectd/collectd.conf FQDNLookup true LoadPlugin battery LoadPlugin cpu LoadPlugin df LoadPlugin disk LoadPlugin entropy LoadPlugin interface LoadPlugin irq LoadPlugin load LoadPlugin memory LoadPlugin processes LoadPlugin rrdtool LoadPlugin swap LoadPlugin syslog LoadPlugin tcpconns LoadPlugin users DataDir "/var/lib/collectd/rrd" LogLevel info Include "/etc/collectd/thresholds.conf -- Collectd using a lot of CPU? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
